Jump to content

S4GRU Make-Over?

nmartine3

By nmartine3
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

nmartine3 Member Level: 1x Advanced

nmartine3

Posted
Posted

So, what does everyone think of the new look?

 

Personally, I think it looks excellent, very Sprint-esque, and it looks like a new website, with momentum to push it further.

 

Let's get a discussion going here.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

So, what does everyone think of the new look?

 

The makeover is not complete.  S4GRU still needs exfoliation, eyebrow waxing, and maybe some Botox.  Also, photograph S4GRU only on its good side.

 

AJ

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sbolen Member Level: 4G WiMax

sbolen

Posted
Posted

The makeover is not complete. S4GRU still needs exfoliation, eyebrow waxing, and maybe some Botox. Also, photograph S4GRU only on its good side.

 

AJ

Will the carpet match the drapes?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Will the carpet match the drapes?

 

Brazilian wax.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SWMich4G Member Level: 3G EVDO

SWMich4G

Posted
Posted

The yellows that highlight forums/threads with new content hurt my eyes.  Too contrasty or not contrasty enough or something.  I like the individual thread look, but not the forum view.  Text is easier to read off a white background. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Nicely done. I like the color contrast to highlight unread threads!

 

Now, can you please fix Tapatalk?!? [emoji38]

It's always been there. I just boosted up the color a little. As for Tapatalk...

 

Using Moto X² on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kg4icg Member Level: 4G WiMax

kg4icg

Posted
Posted

Since I'm using a Blackberry, I'm not worrying about tapatalk, though I could load it up. I'm on 10.3.1 that I loaded up. As for the sight, I like it. By the way, this looks good on the Spartan browser too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nmartine3 Member Level: 1x Advanced

nmartine3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The T4GRU site is nice as well, everyone should check that out. I'm glad these site exist, thank you Robert, and rest of the staff.  :tu:  :thx:  :frantic:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Nissan Coupe
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • AirlineFlyer
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By AirlineFlyer · Posted

      Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Nissan Skyline

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...