Jump to content

AWS-3 Auction Intermediate Results


bigsnake49

Recommended Posts

Here you go.  I already did the import into Excel.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fvizdt2vfkrw4w7/AWS-3_PWB.xlsx?dl=0

 

AJ

 

Thanks AJ! Wait a minute, only block G was won in the Melbourne-Titusville area? WTH? Does the spectrum go back?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only block G was won in the Melbourne-Titusville area? WTH? Does the spectrum go back?

Another auction.

 

Fcc held

 

Total Items: 3

Items 1-3 of 3

 

License Bidding Units Minimum Bid for Round 342

AW-BEA049-B1

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 371,000 n/a

AW-CMA353-G

Colorado 6 - San Miguel 22,000 n/a

AW-CMA439-G

Kansas 12 - Hodgeman 15,000 n/a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks AJ! Wait a minute, only block G was won in the Melbourne-Titusville area? WTH? Does the spectrum go back?

 

I guess the rest of the blocks are in the Orlando EA.

 

An entity back by Terrestar won quite a few (18) of the B1 block (unpaired) and entities associated with Dish won pretty much the rest as pretty much everybody predicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T anticipates putting this spectrum into service as a supplemental downlink to deliver additional mobile Internet capacity and better performance for its customers. AT&T will work with the FCC, NTIA, DOD, and other federal agencies to also support uplink capacity as soon as possible. - See more at: http://about.att.com/story/att_adds_high_quality_spectrum_to_support_growing_demand_for_mobile_video_and_high_speed_internet.html#sthash.zY8xMtiO.dpuf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who/what is "Joseph A Sofio"? That's not another bidder for Dish, is it?

 

 

I saw that too... Was like WTF?

 

"He" won the CMA that covers Nye County, NV. I'd like to know who he is too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He" won the CMA that covers Nye County, NV. I'd like to know who he is too!

 

He is your chiropractor, Josh.  You know -- Sofio Chiropractic, Pizza, and Spectrum, LLC.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations, Northern Michigan BEA058.  You have officially the least desirable AWS-3 license among all 50 states.  With a provisional winning bid of only $8400 for the AWS-3 A1 block license, even S4GRU membership probably could have raised enough money to win you.

 

AJ

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have believed it unless sprint CEO said it

 

"It wasn't something we had thought of before, but if you look at what we can do with technology [such as carrier aggregation and LTE-TDD technology] to make 2.5 GHz feel like 1.9 MHz spectrum, you can see the value of the Sprint spectrum," he said."

 

Is aggregation by itself enough to equal in quality 4x2 mimo lte?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations, Northern Michigan BEA058. You have officially the least desirable AWS-3 license among all 50 states. With a provisional winning bid of only $8400 for the AWS-3 A1 block license, even S4GRU membership probably could have raised enough money to win you.

 

AJ

Dear God, its Alpena, cheboygan, mackinac city, mackinac island, st. Ignace, and the soo. There is nothing in that bea. I'm surprised it got bought!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically Tyler/longview tx got sold to Dish? Waste of spectrum. I bet they try to sell to The other 3 after the price goes up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations, Northern Michigan BEA058.  You have officially the least desirable AWS-3 license among all 50 states.  With a provisional winning bid of only $8400 for the AWS-3 A1 block license, even S4GRU membership probably could have raised enough money to win you.

Technically, the 3 "FCC held" licenses were the least desirable. It's curious that no one bid even a dollar for them.

 

Speaking of which, what happens to them? Will the FCC attempt to auction them off again at a later date? Were there any unsold licenses in previous auctions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically, the 3 "FCC held" licenses were the least desirable. It's curious that no one bid even a dollar for them.

 

Speaking of which, what happens to them? Will the FCC attempt to auction them off again at a later date? Were there any unsold licenses in previous auctions?

Someone did bid but withdrew their bid.

They will be reauctioned.

Aws1 had unsold 2006 licenses so a 2008 auction sold them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear God, its Alpena, cheboygan, mackinac city, mackinac island, st. Ignace, and the soo. There is nothing in that bea. I'm surprised it got bought!

 

The first site to get it will be Mackinac Island.... so the people that want to get away to the island where cars are prohibited and transportation is by bicycle and horse drawn carriage can make instant posts to their facebook/instragram account of the pile of horse crap in the middle of the street.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. A new band must be created and consumer and vendor equipment must be procured and deployed.

Also, att has declared they're gonna use the downlink spectrum as supplemental downlink so there's probably gonna be two new bands. This is because the uplink will be encumbered by federal users for much longer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what does that tell us about Dish vs T-Mobile vs Sprint and the possibility of mergers between any of those players? Well, in an acquisition scenarios, Dish will be valued much higher after the auction, making it too expensive for either Sprint or T-Mobile. Even in a spectrum sale, the high price of this auction will preclude any spectrum sale. In a merger scenario, the spectrum price gets somewhat hidden because everybody has spectrum. However I can definitely see some movement to network share between all three after the 600MHz auction. I still see Dish acquiring the unpaired uplink for the reserve price and pairing it with the Lighsquared spectrum.

 

Would the high proceeds beyond funding Firstnet encourage the FCC to move PS LMR out of the 800MHz SMR band and onto the nearby 700MHz PS voice band that's adjacent to the PS data band unifying it into a contiguous 15x15MHz band that can be used for both voice and data using VoLTE? One would hope that the FCC and PS community has the forethought to plan beyond the next year and see that the solution is an integrated voice/data communicator.

They haven't even finished the Nextel rebanding yet.

 

Now that AWS-3 is well over 30 billion, if 600Mhz does happen would that auction it be more expensive..maybe in 40+ billion? 

 

They may delay the 600 MHz auction to give the carriers time to digest.

 

"He" won the CMA that covers Nye County, NV. I'd like to know who he is too!

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joseph-sofio/0/643/458

I'm "betting" this guy.  ;-)

 

No. A new band must be created and consumer and vendor equipment must be procured and deployed. 

This is crap. Not saying you're wrong, but saying it's crap that they segment things so damn much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Power limits designate it as uplink-only.

 

If there is any unpaired block in 600Mhz. Maybe that's Sprint should eyes on it and persuade FCC to allow it running TDD.

Unpaird block is much cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.wsj.com/articles/verizon-nears-10-billion-asset-sale-to-frontier-1423087271

 

More in the big winter asset blowout column. Verizon looking to offload more landlines to Frontier. When will they just unload the whole business?

This probably doesn't include FIOS, does it? article doesn't say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This probably doesn't include FIOS, does it? article doesn't say.

Speculation has included FiOS in California, Texas, and Florida, but I don't believe everything I read on Seeking Alpha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
    • Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.
    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...