Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

You slept though everything. Mr. Rip Van Webster Groves.

 

The Cardinals somehow won the World Series in April.

 

The Rams are headed back to the Dome.

 

Ferguson is crime free.

 

And Sprint misused a customer's "ghetto" comment about T-Mobile.

 

;)

 

AJ

I died!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I died!

 

I hope you died of laughter.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I died!

 

Or you died of dysentery.

 

Dysentary.png

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another miscalculated move. Agree they should try to move on. Can the whole series from the listening tour and start over.

 

I think Marcelo would benefit just as much from doing a listening tour to his retail stores, web team, and social media/PR team.

 

He should go to the top performing stores in regions to learn what works... and the lowest performing stores to learn what doesn't. And if changes need to be made in personnel, procedure, whatever.... make them within 24 hours.

 

At the risk of repeating myself, have him use one of the in-store sales terminals. Have him convince a customer to get TEP. All these things that work in theory in the boardroom or cubicle, he needs to experience them on the ground.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im assuming by this tweet its safe to say Sprint will definitely have postpaid net adds this quarter..

 

https://twitter.com/NeeNeeSprint/status/720469425976184832

Nice. And what will Muppet and co say when Sprint announces net adds? Sometimes I think the narrative of impending bankruptcy has more to do with certain critics dreaming about sprint's best spectrum/network assets being acquired by more favored competitors than it does actual hatred of the company.

 

If the kerfuffle about the G word continues, it will be part of a larger narrative much the same. Many people see both sprint and tmo as subpar. They are both often embraced by the budget minded community. Marcelo's desire to "do something more genuine" or to be more authentic by traveling and sitting down with customers is by no means a "giant failure" because of a blunder in a 30 second piece. I personally hope they continue releasing videos of customer comments, perhaps ones that are thorny on sprint. Let him answer - its an incredible opportunity for the ceo to reset expectations about the future of the network

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-taking-wait-and-see-approach-5g/2016-04-13

 

Well, I don't like this. While 200MHz of 2.5GHz is solid, it's not entirely nationwide. Furthermore, some of the others have 1GHz of EHF spectrum, and are prepped to kick off testing. They need to stop messing around & deliver because all the public cares about is sheer speed, reliability, & availability.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-taking-wait-and-see-approach-5g/2016-04-13

 

Well, I don't like this. While 200MHz of 2.5GHz is solid, it's not entirely nationwide. Furthermore, some of the others have 1GHz of EHF spectrum, and are prepped to kick off testing. They need to stop messing around & deliver because all the public cares about is sheer speed, reliability, & availability.

 

I don't think Sprint wants to share its playbook, but I'm convinced Sprint will be doing some interesting things with unlicensed spectrum.

 

Have a look at this related article in which Jay Bluhm, VP of network planning at Sprint says unlicensed spectrum is "critical":

 

 

Perhaps more interesting was the discussion on the use of unlicensed spectrum, with Bluhm noting unlicensed was “critical” for Sprint, though not for the reasons it might be for other operators.

 

“We don’t have a need from a capacity perspective,” Bluhm said, adding the biggest challenge was to find a way to deploy services over unlicensed spectrum that continued to meet the quality of service expectations of cellular customers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Sprint wants to share its playbook, but I'm convinced Sprint will be doing some interesting things with unlicensed spectrum.

 

Have a look at this related article in which Jay Bluhm, VP of network planning at Sprint says unlicensed spectrum is "critical":

It's weird because it's Bluhm in the article I linked saying they're gonna "wait and see".

 

I don't think they should disclose all details, but transparency about testing should be out in the open. 5G is access to new markets in the future, and gives carriers greater opportunity to generate revenue than LTE allows today. I really hope they got some good things in the works!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like a lot of things in life some are lucky and others are not. T-Mobile has had lady luck on their side from the very beginning of there LTE deployment. Sprint not picking up Metro pcs, T-Mobile getting massive free cash from ATT to fund a ton of there stuff. Put that together with perfect gen-x marketing and a decent deployment (I won't give them all the credit because of the fact that fiber was already there and made their job exponentially easier) add to that a huge number of Sprint defectors due to NV.

 

It's easy to see why T-Mobile has been riding so high.

A small public service announcent. Deutsche Telekom received the cash at the termination of the AT&T merger attempt. That went to pay off debt in Germany. That didn't stay in the US.

 

Not sure how that keeps floating out there, but it is in both AT&T and DT press releases.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's weird because it's Bluhm in the article I linked saying they're gonna "wait and see".

 

I don't think they should disclose all details, but transparency about testing should be out in the open. 5G is access to new markets in the future, and gives carriers greater opportunity to generate revenue than LTE allows today. I really hope they got some good things in the works!

 

I agree. Sprint is building a 5G network architecture, but they don't want to call it 5G yet for some reason. Tarek Robbiati made it very clear that they're building for 5G, not 4G. LTE Advanced has much more runway to offer Sprint than other carriers, especially with how it can scale to 3xCA, 4xCA and 5xCA.

 

I don't think the "Wait and See" really changes anything on the ground. It's still happening, whether it's called 5G or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Sprint is building a 5G network architecture, but they don't want to call it 5G yet for some reason. Tarek Robbiati made it very clear that they're building for 5G, not 4G. LTE Advanced has much more runway to offer Sprint than other carriers, especially with how it can scale to 3xCA, 4xCA and 5xCA.

 

I don't think the "Wait and See" really changes anything on the ground. It's still happening, whether it's called 5G or not.

 

I think that Sprint will probably stop at 3xCA and then you might see 2 chains of 3xCA. I'm pretty sure that's probably due to handset limitations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Sprint is building a 5G network architecture, but they don't want to call it 5G yet for some reason. Tarek Robbiati made it very clear that they're building for 5G, not 4G. LTE Advanced has much more runway to offer Sprint than other carriers, especially with how it can scale to 3xCA, 4xCA and 5xCA.

 

I don't think the "Wait and See" really changes anything on the ground. It's still happening, whether it's called 5G or not.

The way 5G is going to work, Sprint will need to use far more spectrum than even they have. It isn't by accident that a lot of the 5th generation research is in the MmWave and CmWave regions of spectrum. That's going to take a rethink of radio interfaces and far greater cell density than before.

 

I'm just starting to do research on 5G standards are and where this is going. That said, Sprint has bigger fish to fry than 5G at the current time. Survival would be first on the agenda.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Marcelo would benefit just as much from doing a listening tour to his retail stores, web team, and social media/PR team.

 

He should go to the top performing stores in regions to learn what works... and the lowest performing stores to learn what doesn't. And if changes need to be made in personnel, procedure, whatever.... make them within 24 hours.

 

At the risk of repeating myself, have him use one of the in-store sales terminals. Have him convince a customer to get TEP. All these things that work in theory in the boardroom or cubicle, he needs to experience them on the ground.

 

Right after I graduated from College I worked in the CS call center for a financial company for a while.  One thing I always thought was impressive was that every so often the CEO of the company would come around and talk to us and then get on the phones and take calls from customers for an hour.  Also on days when we would be getting slammed with calls it was not uncommon for senior managers and directors to come out of their offices and jump on the phones to take calls.  That type of stuff always impressed me.  And I know some direct changes came about based on our CEO's experiences taking calls. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Marcelo would benefit just as much from doing a listening tour to his retail stores, web team, and social media/PR team.

 

:idea2:  He should hire me.... oh and a few others here to help give him direct thoughts and experiences regarding Sprint. Maybe we can set up a conference call with him. Who's in?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Sprint is building a 5G network architecture, but they don't want to call it 5G yet for some reason. Tarek Robbiati made it very clear that they're building for 5G, not 4G. LTE Advanced has much more runway to offer Sprint than other carriers, especially with how it can scale to 3xCA, 4xCA and 5xCA.

 

I don't think the "Wait and See" really changes anything on the ground. It's still happening, whether it's called 5G or not.

 

Sorry but if Sprint decides to call whatever flavor of LTE Plus as 5G they'll be a laughing stock.  They'll call it WIMAX 5G or whatever.

 

Even though no one needs speeds even above 1 carrier B41...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but if Sprint decides to call whatever flavor of LTE Plus as 5G they'll be a laughing stock.  They'll call it WIMAX 5G or whatever.

 

Even though no one needs speeds even above 1 carrier B41...

 

So when should it be called 5G?

 

This isn't just about speeds. It's about capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:idea2: He should hire me.... oh and a few others here to help give him direct thoughts and experiences regarding Sprint. Maybe we can set up a conference call with him. Who's in?

If only it were possible...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how Marcelo or other Sprint employees assigned to this managed to find these "customers". From all the talk about it from Marcelo, this sounded as if it were going to be an informal chat between Marcelo and Sprint customers about their views regarding Sprint, what they like about Sprint, what they don't like about Sprint, and what could make Sprint better. It certainly wasn't made to seem like a marketing opportunity for Sprint to make ads out of bashing their competitors.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how Marcelo or other Sprint employees assigned to this managed to find these "customers". From all the talk about it from Marcelo, this sounded as if it were going to be an informal chat between Marcelo and Sprint customers about their views regarding Sprint, what they like about Sprint, what they don't like about Sprint, and what could make Sprint better. It certainly wasn't made to seem like a marketing opportunity for Sprint to make ads out of bashing their competitors.

 

The process by which they found these people was very mysterious. I'm sure they had to sign some kind of release for their comments to be used. Otherwise, I have no idea how they found these people.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how Marcelo or other Sprint employees assigned to this managed to find these "customers". From all the talk about it from Marcelo, this sounded as if it were going to be an informal chat between Marcelo and Sprint customers about their views regarding Sprint, what they like about Sprint, what they don't like about Sprint, and what could make Sprint better. It certainly wasn't made to seem like a marketing opportunity for Sprint to make ads out of bashing their competitors.

 

I dont know Spints process, but what we usually do is as part of a routine survey we ask people if they would be interested in participating in a focus group for some compensation for their time. If they want to, they leave their contact info.

 

Of the 1,000 people who say yes, maybe 20 actually agree to show up at the required date and time.

 

They then sign off on waivers concerning their rights to privacy and such.

 

Obviously having a room full of cameras completely changes the dynamic vs a fully private and anonymous discussion. The filmed conversation is probably not valuable at all.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not debate differences in Sprint service at different locations.  For the purposes of this post, I do not care.

 

But Facebook?  Really?  Is it representative of the whole?  Almost every comment is negative.  Facebook has become shit.

 

Back when I was in college -- and Facebook was limited to educational institutions -- it was a neat resource for meeting and recognizing new people.  Then, Facebook opened to everyone and his dog.  The emphasis on the latter.

 

The Facebook commenting system used by so many web sites now is horrible.  Not all that intelligent people -- who could/would never actually write a letter to the editor of the local newspaper, cogently make an argument at a city council meeting, or coherently interact with their political representatives -- now can express their feelings on any and all matters.  Dumb, meet dumber.

 

Facebook has become the cesspool of the Web.  I think somebody used the term "vitriol" earlier in this thread.  I agree.  You nailed it.

 

For Facebook, thanks, Obama...I mean, thanks, Zuckerberg.

 

;)

 

AJ

Subjectivity of the reader taken into account, I just wanted to simply state that for my part, if I could 'like' a post 1000 times but could only do it once, this post would probably be my choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The listening tour lost its credibility when he decided to carry a TV crew to record the whole thing. If you wanted to listen to customers you could had done that while your assistant takes notes.

 

You didn't need to prove the whole industry that you are traveling around America's top notch cities listening to customers from every carrier about what they want from their carrier.

 

Most wireless customers except the tiny minority that is part of the magentan cult simple want their service to work to make phone calls, text and data anytime they need it regardless where they are. In a simple terms just be the dumb pipe. Customers want that, and be treated with respect from their carrier that's all.

 

Ever since Legere started throwing candy around many especially tech blogs are treating wireless service as something different. Seems the used car salesman techniques have worked on the sheep.

Doing a listening tour for internal improvement and publicizing the fact that you're doing a listening tour for promotional marketing is not mutually exclusive. Both can be accomplished from the same activity and it would be dumb of Sprint to not promote that he's out talking with customers. You taking exception to the publicity isn't realistic in my opinion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I agree the listening tour is a joke. If Marcelo Claure want to know why customers leaving sprint just go to sprint's Facebook and compare to T-Mobile att and Verizon. There is a huge difference in the amount of unhappy customers compared to the other 3 carriers. I don't use sprint service so cannot tell how much improved they are compared to 2 years ago. But my receptionist has sprint and once in a while she has voice and data issues. At least she does not have to walk to the back of the office to get reception like 2 years ago. I has never encountered those problems with att. Yes sprint improves but not enough for people to switch since their service is still not up to par compared to other 3 carriers in metro areas.

Customers ranting on Facebook do NOT reflect a representative sample of any company's customer base or their concerns.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...