Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Has Sprint been performing well at CES in previous years or is it just this upcoming year that they are being proactive about it? I haven't been to Vegas at all this year so I don't know if the Strip has improved indoors and outdoors in 2015.

I'm pretty sure one of our members said that they had Band 41 up and running at the convention and that the network was working rather well the entire time.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure one of our members said that they had Band 41 up and running at the convention and that the network was working rather well the entire time.

 

-Anthony

Last time I was in Vegas, coverage on the strip and inside buildings was awful. I can't wait to see the difference of 18 months.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure one of our members said that they had Band 41 up and running at the convention and that the network was working rather well the entire time.

 

-Anthony

Band 41 was not fully covering the convention center, however, Band 25 was usable in there at 20+ Mbps at SEMA at the beginning of November. Band 25 uploads left a lot to be desired at less than 1.5 Mbps, but I wasn't concerned about the upload.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Progress!

 

Sprint Network Shares #1 Ranking in Reliability and Call Performance in Washington D.C.

This is the first time Sprint has received a RootScore Award in Washington D.C. for network reliability. And this is the first time Sprint has received a RootScore Award in Washington D.C. for call performance since January 2012.

 

 

Congrats Sprint!

 

In addition, Sprint has improved service and upgraded the wireless systems at Verizon Center, Washington Dulles Airport, Reagan National Airport, United State Senate and Capital Buildings, House of Representatives, Smithsonian Museum Complex at National Mall, Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Walter E. Washington Convention Center. Future upgrades are in progress at Nationals Park, WMATA, and the Fashion Centre Mall at Pentagon City.

 

Really great to see these investments being made.

 

By the way, here's the latest on the WMATA build: Article

 

Metro announced last month that it had reached a new agreement with four major wireless carriers on a plan to make service available throughout the transit system’s 101 miles of tunnels by the end of the decade.

 

The original contract had called for the four companies to install the necessary cables in the tunnels, but the project has been mired in delays that probably would have continued.

 

So, under a new plan, expected to be finalized soon, the consortium of carriers will pay Metro tens of millions of dollars to do the tunnel wiring. That prospect concerns some observers, who cite Metro’s troubled performance record.

 

So we'll see how this goes. At least it'll be a progressive build that will be live as new equipment is added.

 

Some additional background.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the Air and Space Museum's Dulles facility on Saturday and as best I can tell, Sprint was the only carrier with a DAS in that building, and the DAS had B25 and B26.  Signal was generally around -80 dBm, while the other carriers were closer to -110 dBm.

 

I knew Sprint had a DAS there, but was surprised to find the others didn't seem to.

 

Here's the link to RootMetrics:  http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/washington-dc/2015/2H

 

And I hope Pentagon City is done soon.  Verizon and AT&T have LTE there, T-Mobile appears to have LTE from a nearby building, and Sprint has 3G that often drops to 1X if you're in the wrong part of the mall.

 

- Trip

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the Air and Space Museum's Dulles facility on Saturday and as best I can tell, Sprint was the only carrier with a DAS in that building, and the DAS had B25 and B26.  Signal was generally around -80 dBm, while the other carriers were closer to -110 dBm.

 

I knew Sprint had a DAS there, but was surprised to find the others didn't seem to.

 

Here's the link to RootMetrics:  http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/washington-dc/2015/2H

 

And I hope Pentagon City is done soon.  Verizon and AT&T have LTE there, T-Mobile appears to have LTE from a nearby building, and Sprint has 3G that often drops to 1X if you're in the wrong part of the mall.

 

- Trip

 

I'm glad that Sprint is being specific in listing these venues. Is installing a Triband DAS more expensive? I'm surprised that Sprint wouldn't also deploy Band 41 at venues like the Museum facility in Dulles where there are heavy concentrations of people.

 

Hopefully, Band 41 is deployed at the Pentagon City Mall as well given the crowd surge and size. WMATA stations also could benefit substantially from Band 41 being deployed.

 

Final question: Can these upgraded wireless systems support 2x20 CA for Band 41 and Beamforming, or is that only on the Macro Network?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 41 was not fully covering the convention center, however, Band 25 was usable in there at 20+ Mbps at SEMA at the beginning of November. Band 25 uploads left a lot to be desired at less than 1.5 Mbps, but I wasn't concerned about the upload.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

 

Sounds like Vegas could really use a 2nd B25 carrier in addition to more B41 coverage overall.  It doesn't help that Vegas is still blocked from deploying B26 LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like Vegas could really use a 2nd B25 carrier in addition to more B41 coverage overall. It doesn't help that Vegas is still blocked from deploying B26 LTE.

A 2nd B25 carrier? Yes please! Overall LTE coverage is really good city wide from my experiences of driving around. There are a few places where my phone still drops to 3G, but even EVDO isn't unbearable most of the time. I would like to see B41 the city over, but I know these things take time. I still would rather see LTE in Pahrump sooner rather than later, but back haul vendors here are few and far between.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 2nd B25 carrier? Yes please! Overall LTE coverage is really good city wide from my experiences of driving around. There are a few places where my phone still drops to 3G, but even EVDO isn't unbearable most of the time. I would like to see B41 the city over, but I know these things take time. I still would rather see LTE in Pahrump sooner rather than later, but back haul vendors here are few and far between.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

 

Who are the local backhaul vendors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are the local backhaul vendors?

AT&T, maybe Suddenlink. I'm hoping my local electric cooperative with their new 1 Gbps Fiber broadband network would be game for cell site backhaul. They just launched in September.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If all four networks had median downlink speeds in the 11.2-14.4 Mbps range while T-Mobile had a median uplink speed of 17.2 Mbps, we can conclude that T-Mobile once again had a slower downlink than uplink.  That network is teetering in the wrong direction.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Final question: Can these upgraded wireless systems support 2x20 CA for Band 41 and Beamforming, or is that only on the Macro Network?

 

Beamforming is not likely on DAS, which often is designed to flood with signal a hard to cover space.  Beamforming typically requires large, phased antenna arrays.  That is better suited to the macro network.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beamforming is not likely on DAS, which often is designed to flood with signal a hard to cover space.  Beamforming typically requires large, phased antenna arrays.  That is better suited to the macro network.

 

AJ

 

Thanks. Is implementing 2x20 CA actually possible on DAS? I ask because when Sprint launched its DAS at Kauffman Field, there was no mention of it supporting 2x20 CA on Band 41. Given the concentration of folks at a game, having 2x20 CA on Band 41 seems like it would be especially helpful in that circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T, maybe Suddenlink. I'm hoping my local electric cooperative with their new 1 Gbps Fiber broadband network would be game for cell site backhaul. They just launched in September.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

 

Sprint has yet to name a President for Southern CA, and Northern CA/NV.

 

Perhaps we'll see some additional action once that happens.

 

Map Link: http://bizwire.tekgroup.com/media/86/ONE_Sprint_Map_12815_Highres.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Is implementing 2x20 CA actually possible on DAS? I ask because when Sprint launched its DAS at Kauffman Field, there was no mention of it supporting 2x20 CA on Band 41. Given the concentration of folks at a game, having 2x20 CA on Band 41 seems like it would be especially helpful in that circumstance.

 

DAS does not limit CA.  As long as it has the bandwidth to support multiple carriers, then it can support CA.  I cannot confirm 2x CA on any of my current handsets, but the Truman Sports Complex in Kansas City has two band 41 carriers, more recently, two band 25 carriers, too.  If I were Sprint, though, I would disable 2x CA on band 41 at the stadiums.  High capacity, not super speed, is the key.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were Sprint, though, I would disable 2x CA on band 41 at the stadiums.  High capacity, not super speed, is the key.

 

Thanks. Can you explain this a bit more? Would having a separate B41 carrier be better than doing 2xCA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Can you explain this a bit more? Would having a separate B41 carrier be better than doing 2xCA?

You would need a second carrier anyways for CA. CA is just basically combining two carriers into one. Having two separate carriers will still be 40mhz of bandwidth, but will be treated as two separate carriers (for a maximum of 72mbps instead of 144.)

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Can you explain this a bit more? Would having a separate B41 carrier be better than doing 2xCA?

 

In order to have 2x CA, you must have at least two carriers.  I just would not link them together, would not allow 2x CA connections.  In an environment with thousands of people, it is better to provide two people with x speeds than one person with 2x speeds.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long story short all test done inside a vzw store.. They jumped on me for having sprint started talking about data and speeds.

They couldn't get over 35 with their phones...... I explained they don't give enough data to use because most vzw people beg for wifi.... Nuff said after the speed tests they started talking about coverage in Montana..

If we are in Massachusetts why are we comparing coverage in Montana???!!!

image.jpeg

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long story short all test done inside a vzw store.. They jumped on me for having sprint started talking about data and speeds.

They couldn't get over 35 with their phones...... I explained they don't give enough data to use because most vzw people beg for wifi.... Nuff said after the speed tests they started talking about coverage in Montana..

If we are in Massachusetts why are we comparing coverage in Montana???!!!

#reaching
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long story short all test done inside a vzw store.. They jumped on me for having sprint started talking about data and speeds.

They couldn't get over 35 with their phones...... I explained they don't give enough data to use because most vzw people beg for wifi.... Nuff said after the speed tests they started talking about coverage in Montana..

If we are in Massachusetts why are we comparing coverage in Montana???!!!

Too bad a potential Verizon customer wasn't around and saw that speed test happen. That really would have been a customer lost.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Can you explain this a bit more? Would having a separate B41 carrier be better than doing 2xCA?

 

2xCA utilizes both B41 carriers. That means one user is taking up a slice of both carriers. If you disable 2xCA, then that user is only occupying a slice of one carrier. That frees up the other carrier for a second user. More capacity, but not the 100+Mbps peak speeds. Better use of spectrum. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2xCA utilizes both B41 carriers. That means one user is taking up a slice of both carriers. If you disable 2xCA, then that user is only occupying a slice of one carrier. That frees up the other carrier for a second user. More capacity, but not the 100+Mbps peak speeds. Better use of spectrum. 

 

Thanks. Very helpful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...