Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 


Speaking of VOLTE. Has Sprint said anything about the next round of VOLTE launches?

I’m dying over here. emoji20.png

 

I think the S9 got them yesterday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the S9 got them yesterday


My iPhone XS MAX has VOLTE. Sprint hasn’t launched it in my market yet. I can go an hour and half south and BAM [emoji95] VOLTE. Just not available in my market.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 


My iPhone XS MAX has VOLTE. Sprint hasn’t launched it in my market yet. I can go an hour and half south and BAM emoji95.png VOLTE. Just not available in my market.

 

Yea we have here in STL but I don't have it on my phone. I want to get the V50 when it comes out but worried that it will long than my G7 to get it. Stuck in between a rock and hard place!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 


Speaking of VOLTE. Has Sprint said anything about the next round of VOLTE launches?

I’m dying over here. emoji20.png

 

Not that I’ve heard... I’m on an iPhone XS in a supported market so I’ve had it for a while now. I get what you’re feeling.

It would seem ridiculous for Sprint to have a 5G launch without officially launching VoLTE... but it’s certainly possible that could happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Terrell352 said:

Where did you see that at?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Someone I know sent a SS showing LTE Calling (Beta). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone I know sent a SS showing LTE Calling (Beta). 
LTE Calling (Beta) is Calling Plus rebranded and has been on the S9 for months. It will actually say VoLTE when we get it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Terrell352 said:

LTE Calling (Beta) is Calling Plus rebranded and has been on the S9 for months. It will actually say VoLTE when we get it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I hope an analyst asks Sprint about VoLTE at the next Earnings Call... This is getting ridiculous.

An expanded satisfaction guarantee is a bad idea in my opinion when you can't yet offer simultaneous voice/data via VoLTE on a majority of devices.

This seems like an expensive proposition in the making...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope an analyst asks Sprint about VoLTE at the next Earnings Call... This is getting ridiculous.
Considering Dan Hasse was talking about it in NV 1.0 about 7 years ago I would say it's been past ridiculous.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Terrell352 said:

Considering Dan Hasse was talking about it in NV 1.0 about 7 years ago I would say it's been past ridiculous.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Yup. If the money isn’t available, you wind up with a Ferrari that doesn’t have fuel.

So much potential. So little money.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. If the money isn’t available, you wind up with a Ferrari that doesn’t have fuel.
So much potential. So little money.

That’s why the merger needs to happen.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:


That’s why the merger needs to happen.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No it doesn’t.

The whole idea of leading or “keeping up” with China for 5G is a farce in my opinion.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn’t.
The whole idea of leading or “keeping up” with China for 5G is a farce in my opinion.
I'm talking about more than that. Coverage isn't up to par with everyone else. Uploads are not that great and, waiting on VOLTE is getting old.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/10/2019 at 10:44 AM, nexgencpu said:

Sprint will end up with quite a 5G coverage advantage on day one. The question is, how long will they be able to hold that.

I'm curious about this as well. We're already seeing Massive MIMO antennas being deployed in other markets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brad The Beast said:

Columbus I know for sure is one of them. @dkyeager can attest to this.

Groovy, Sprint needs to get off the switcher teat that is in the cities and focus on acquiring new customers in areas they provide poor to no service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, belusnecropolis said:

Groovy, Sprint needs to get off the switcher teat that is in the cities and focus on acquiring new customers in areas they provide poor to no service.

They need to but I don't think that's the best idea right now. I think the best plan right now is to improve service in the cities where they would get the best return on investment.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brad The Beast said:

They need to but I don't think that's the best idea right now. I think the best plan right now is to improve service in the cities where they would get the best return on investment.

They are continually reducing prices in cities to try to convince people to switch. If they didn't get them with the MiniMacro rollout, I don't see adding 8t8r or a NR antenna with a smaller radii making much difference.  The product is already devalued in a saturated market. Move into greener pastures that have enough pent up demand for competition and a higher user spend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, belusnecropolis said:

They are continually reducing prices in cities to try to convince people to switch. If they didn't get them with the MiniMacro rollout, I don't see adding 8t8r or a NR antenna with a smaller radii making much difference.  The product is already devalued in a saturated market. Move into greener pastures that have enough pent up demand for competition and a higher user spend. 

They wouldn't make much money though right away. Especially since it would take them a while to actually roll out service to these areas because they have to deal with local government permitting which always takes ages. I think there is a great opportunity to provide both cellular and home internet service in these areas which could be a big money maker but I don't think cellular alone would be worth their while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brad The Beast said:

They wouldn't make much money though right away. Especially since it would take them a while to actually roll out service to these areas because they have to deal with local government permitting which always takes ages. I think there is a great opportunity to provide both cellular and home internet service in these areas which could be a big money maker but I don't think cellular alone would be worth their while.

Home internet would consume upwards of 10X the usage. Offering mobile only would achieve a greenfield spend and return ARPU above historically low levels in an area that previously offered no revenue, or cost due to roaming. In the cities we have seen in market roaming on T-mobile, prices drop dramatically and a stagnant add and higher churn. While debt spending on markets and sites that were recently upgraded. This makes no sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, belusnecropolis said:

Home internet would consume upwards of 10X the usage. Offering mobile only would achieve a greenfield spend and return ARPU above historically low levels in an area that previously offered no revenue, or cost due to roaming. In the cities we have seen in market roaming on T-mobile, prices drop dramatically and a stagnant add and higher churn. While debt spending on markets and sites that were recently upgraded. This makes no sense. 

I didn't think of roaming costs. But still, why would you spend money to provide service in an area where like 10 people live? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brad The Beast said:

I didn't think of roaming costs. But still, why would you spend money to provide service in an area where like 10 people live? 

So you can get 10 paying customers, not paying VZW for roaming access, further subsidize your urban users who may or may not stay from month to month, and encourage development of connected services in a market you do not even perform in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, belusnecropolis said:

So you can get 10 paying customers, not paying VZW for roaming access, further subsidize your urban users who may or may not stay from month to month, and encourage development of connected services in a market you do not even perform in.

But certainly I could subsidize my urban users by improving services in their area, providing the ability to earn more paying customers? Then I'm increasing my ability to earn more money, thus making more money available for rural expansion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...