Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

sorry for the confusion, mines also a gmo...

 

I do daily sprint zone reports and call/Tweet sprint about it. They finally launched b26 last week of two of my converted sites last week.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I actually made a comment via Twitter to the CEO and sprint care saying there needs to be a fill-in site

I have been getting band 25 very close to my house now And band 26 but it doesn't reach

 

Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk

 

Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcelo did say " as more permits get approved, capex spending will go up". So maybe we will see a bigger push next year

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

It's different if they aren't pursuing permits in the first place. [emoji28]
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satellite back haul? Aren't satellite based ISPs really slow? How will this work? I assume a jump in latency would be a given.

Quote from Gilat..

 

"Gilat addressed these challenges through cost effective embedded acceleration in the SkyEdge II-c hubs and terminals, which overcame the satellite latency issues to support the high speed requirements of 3G/LTE networks. The Capricorn-4 and Capricorn Pro VSATs, which support TDM/TDMA at 200Mbps, were designed explicitly to meet the 3G/LTE performance requirements."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's in an area where Sprint has high market share (urban), I wouldn't count on it anytime soon.

I live only 45 minutes from New York City and I live in the central New Jersey Market

 

Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet Gilet/Sprint's announcement seems to be directly addressing this issue of getting LTE to these remaining sits and then some expansion.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Are you talking about GMOs

 

Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's in an area where Sprint has high market share (urban), I wouldn't count on it anytime soon.

Ya, this is very hard to say, but by the low capex and heavy small cell roll outs.

. I'm going to say over 2 to 3 year period maybe

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-MOBILE stated that 90 % of there traffic is on lte so there way ahead in that department

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Sprint has a long way to go. Unless they discipline themselves and upgrade the remaining 3G only sites and continue their LTE efforts they will be in a lot of trouble they don't do that

 

Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet Gilet/Sprint's announcement seems to be directly addressing this issue of getting LTE to these remaining sits and then some expansion.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

The original idea was that they were going to use wireless microwave back haul instead. Sprint doesn't have the capex to upgrade GMO 3G only sites in these rural/suburban areas where their market share doesn't justify the cost. It's still probably going to be 2-3 years after the fact before those sites get LTE.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satellite back haul? Aren't satellite based ISPs really slow? How will this work? I assume a jump in latency would be a given.

Satellite backhaul can support 1+ Gbps. The ping depends on what kind of orbit the satellite is located low earth orbit can be as low as 150 milliseconds. It will not be good for urban settings but would be good for rural highway sites. They could have one satellite backhaul site and it using microwave to get more sites upto lte.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened to the idea of one macro feeding mini macros and small cells through microwave? Now it's going to satellite as well?

 

One thing we know with sprint is nothing is ever final until it's final.

I think the Macro/Mini/ Small plan is for more urban markets while sattelite is for more rural areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened to the idea of one macro feeding mini macros and small cells through microwave? Now it's going to satellite as well?

 

One thing we know with sprint is nothing is ever final until it's final.

 

That is an urban solution. This is a rural solution.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They started the year with Capex guidance of 4.5 billions then lowered to 3 billions, and now they won't even get near of that figure.

 

One of the things that I find funny is the fact that they keep talking the bs of lack

Of small cells permits for the low Capex. Last time I checked there are more than 20k macros without 8T8R radios.

 

Sprint is settling as a budget carrier, and that should concern the stockholders.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am confused smh. Didn't sprint have some rural expansion plans announced last year or the year before?? Project ocean and cedar I wanna say the south a northwest?????

 

Project Ocean was mainly in Missouri and Illinois. A large number of former USCC sites were added to the network improving coverage in and around the St. Louis and Chicago metros, as well as parts of Central Illinois and northern Indiana.

 

Project Cedar is in Montana, and Sprint does have some sites online there, however it's more of a protection network than anything... putting the spectrum holdings to use so Sprint doesn't lose them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...