Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

That is uncalled for and blatantly ignorant. You've never indulged in anything "not necessary"? I doubt that. If someone enjoys having a new phone not based on some arbitrary timeline set by carriers many years ago, why should they not be able to do that? It's about options. Why do you care so much?

 

Excess for no apparent reason is what made America great. We don't need 1500 nukes, but hey...why not? Eat it USSR!

You're right. I don't care. My thought was related to the over indulgence of the plan. Not Johnner1999.

 

I will say that I am sorry for putting the post up directed at Johnner1999. I am willing to admit my mistake on that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. I don't care. My thought was related to the over indulgence of the plan. Not Johnner1999.

 

I will say that I am sorry for putting the post up directed at Johnner1999. I am willing to admit my mistake on that.

I do think 3 new phones a year is a bit much, for me at least. I'm typically exclusive to iPhones, but every once in a while I'll give a flagship Android phone a try.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means that one person can screw everyone on the plan over. If one person abuses the data and pushes it over 20GB then everyone is going to get slow speeds.

 

I feel like part of the reason why T-Mobile is able to institute throttling so well is because they don't have shared data plans. Everyone gets an equal share of data on the plan and if that specific person goes over their allotment then they get throttled.

 

Er, would you rather have slow speeds, or overage charges on your shared data? Any type of shared data plan is subject to one (or more) persons screwing the others and using up all the allotment.

 

 

I will offer this as a counterpoint -- not a refutation, mind you -- just a counterpoint.

 

Why should data users not have to pay overages?  Should operators accept that responsibility for them?  Or should consumers be more answerable and increase their data tiers or curtail their usage?  Just look at other similar situations...

 

When voice airtime was tiered, did users who exhausted their allotments get throttled -- could they speak only five words per minute?  No.  If they continued to use airtime, they paid overages.

 

If I exceed my credit limit in a given month, do my subsequent charges get throttled -- are they approved for only pennies on the dollar or are only a small fraction of transactions approved?  No.  If I continue to rack up credit charges, I pay a penalty.  Or I get cut off.

 

If you do not return a rental car on time, does the car get throttled -- does it turn into only a bicycle?  No.  For as long as you use the car beyond the return time, you pay charges and/or fees.

 

We are now about a dozen years into the mobile packet data era.  That is plenty of time to adapt.  People should manage their own data usage.  They should select tiers that are personally and financially appropriate.   That is how supply industries balance consumer demand.

 

AJ

 

My opinion is a combination;

 

On any tiered plan (shared or individual) of a specified data bucket, if you go over your limit you get throttled (at a still reasonably usable speed), however if you wish to keep full speed data rate, you pay a reasonable price per gig to extend your bucket until the next billing cycle.

 

This way there is no 'surprise' overages, yet there is both the option to continue at reduced speed, or option to pay additional for full speed.

 

 

Yeah

 

Not being argumentative, do people really keep a smartphone for 2 years or longer?

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

 

Lots people keep them more than 2 years, but not necessarily as the active phone.

 

Ie, hand them down to family members and/or backup devices.

 

And of course there is the option to sell them or trade them in for credit.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think 3 new phones a year is a bit much, for me at least. I'm typically exclusive to iPhones, but every once in a while I'll give a flagship Android phone a try.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Totally agree

 

3 is a bit much.

 

But my logic is TMO is using phones as an attraction rather than "free" unlimited data. The phones might get people side tracked a bit. And that doesn't gobble up spectrum. Just a thought.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah

 

Not being argumentative, do people really keep a smartphone for 2 years or longer?

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Some people do. My dad kept his phone for 4 years. I'm actually going on 3 years with my S3(which is shocking for me) Some people don't see the need to upgrade every 2 years. Me personally, I would like to upgrade but there isn't anything that really catches my eye.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On overages here is my take. Just price your data per GB. You pay for what you eat. Have a reasonable per GB price. Maybe $7/GB or something like that. No fuss no muss! You don't have to ever change the plan. You can reduce the price

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the uncarrier pricing is complete bs, but te other uncarrier stuff has been great to the industry.

 

We only get free international 2g because Tmobile did it.

 

The not counting streaming music in the data is also really cool.

 

 

I havent seen a single pricing innovation thats been good for the customer, coming from any company, but at least weve gotten some good features.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see if Music Freedom survives the glaring heat or Title II. It is something the Commission should take time to examine. If Verizon enacted the same policy on the Open Access waves they own, I would anticipate FCC action toward them.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see if Music Freedom survives the glaring heat or Title II. It is something the Commission should take time to examine. If Verizon enacted the same policy on the Open Access waves they own, I would anticipate FCC action toward them.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Would you like it if Sprint had that option?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you like it if Sprint had that option?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No. Data should count as data. Period.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Data should count as data. Period.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I dont see it being any different than having a limited minute basket, but unlimited minutes to your pre-selected friends and family (AT&T), or Sprints very own Unlimited Moble to mobile.

 

Should voice always be counted as voice?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see it being any different than having a limited minute basket, but unlimited minutes to your pre-selected friends and family (AT&T), or Sprints very own Unlimited Moble to mobile.

 

Should voice always be counted as voice?

The days of special voice features like free calling on nights and weekends or unlimited mobile to mobile are long gone.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't what he is saying. He said what is the difference between a bucket of data and having music apps be unlimited vs having a bucket of minutes and having select people or mobiles be unlimited.

 

Isn't that the same type of analogy?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as all music is treated the same, and that there is no "sponsored" data I have no problem with excluding music. You just can't play favorites!

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as all music is treated the same, and that there is no "sponsored" data I have no problem with excluding music. You just can't play favorites!

Look at this another way: it's not fair that Apple Music counts against your data allotment and Spotify doesn't. That's grounds enough for anticompetitive litigation, I'd imagine -- it's an unfair advantage for competitors in the streaming music space.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at this another way: it's not fair that Apple Music counts against your data allotment and Spotify doesn't. That's grounds enough for anticompetitive litigation, I'd imagine -- it's an unfair advantage for competitors in the streaming music space.

Supposedly Apple Music is quietly whitelisted, I doubt Legere would want to rumble with Cook and Co.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as all music is treated the same, and that there is no "sponsored" data I have no problem with excluding music. You just can't play favorites!

 

Is giving one type of data a free pass -- while holding other types of data to a different standard -- not playing favorites?  That is practically the definition of playing favorites.

 

Net Neutrality should take into account both positive and negative anti neutral actions.

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly Apple Music is quietly whitelisted, I doubt Legere would want to rumble with Cook and Co.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think a bunch of types are unmetered. My phone usage was about 9gb last month, tmo said I used 3.7gb.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...