Jump to content

LuisBOSS302

Recommended Posts

I don't know but 32 GB RAM is really pushing it, no? :P

You'll be laughing at yourself for thinking that in 5 years when your G8 can barely keep up with its 8k screen with only 32 gigs RAM.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the S3 and my 2 year contract is up.  I still like contracts and will sign another 2 year contract when the LG G3 comes out.  As soon as Samsung introduced Knox for all without choice for us non-business users I was done with them.  I was wanting the Note 4, but I won't wait for it due to Knox.  The G3 sounds like exactly what I am looking for.  Hopefully their support/updates gets as good as Samsung is today though.

 

LG has been excellent with updates so far.  No reason to think they will not support the flagship model for 2-3 generations.  I expect to receive updates on this phone until 2015 when I grab the G4  ;) .

-Will

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG has been excellent with updates so far.  No reason to think they will not support the flagship model for 2-3 generations.  I expect to receive updates on this phone until 2015 when I grab the G4  ;) .

-Will

 

Hopefully the G3 will come out with amazing specs and will be another great hit.  I'll see how things are with the LG G3 and see how it might translate into the LG G4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

New screenshot of the G3:

 

http://www.newcellphonesblog.com/lg-g3-screenshot-with-new-ui.html

 

Edit:  Actually I didn't notice the source at first, PhoneArena has a little more detail:

 

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Alleged-LG-G3-screenshot-hints-at-more-flat-design-to-Optimus-UI_id54973

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks great, but I am doubting it is the G3. Why would the G3 have the same processor as the G2? Obviously I am just guessing, but maybe it is something else.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks great, but I am doubting it is the G3. Why would the G3 have the same processor as the G2? Obviously I am just guessing, but maybe it is something else.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Maybe it's making reference to the series?

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the talk of the Galaxy S5 prime or whatever it might be called, maybe LG is planning a G2+ to make sure they get the 2K display to market first. LG has a history of firsts in smartphones

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the talk of the Galaxy S5 prime or whatever it might be called, maybe LG is planning a G2+ to make sure they get the 2K display to market first. LG has a history of firsts in smartphones

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

No point of wasting resources on a G2+.  LG should just focus on making a G3 and make it great and everyone will be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like they're copying Samsung again for the UI.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/lg-g3-homescreen-screenshots-leak-exclusive/#!FoqRt

 

EDIT: Not saying it's bad - but I am somewhat disappointed that bigger companies wont try a new design. :S

 

OH LG....how you never disappoint me in "Ctrl+C" Samsung.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they're copying Samsung again for the UI.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/lg-g3-homescreen-screenshots-leak-exclusive/#!FoqRt

 

EDIT: Not saying it's bad - but I am somewhat disappointed that bigger companies wont try a new design. :S

Nooo... I dont want touchwiz lag..

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nooo... I dont want touchwiz lag..

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

It's just the cosmetics, not the actual code. G2 is essentially lag free compared to the S4/S5 (although I haven't seen s5 lag, I hear it is there.)

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just the cosmetics, not the actual code. G2 is essentially lag free compared to the S4/S5 (although I haven't seen s5 lag, I hear it is there.)

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Yup. My S5 lags here and there.

 

The battery in the G2 is better too. My sister has the G2 and on the same usage her phone has higher battery than mine.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.
    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...