Jump to content

Sprint Coverage map updated to 4/8


dkyeager

Recommended Posts

from 3/11 overnight.  No changes detected in Ohio. Check areas you know to see if any areas have been launched.http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=SJS:HE:Cov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DC/RVA area is still purple. I am surprised they aren't at least launching some of the DMV exurbs.

Our Dept of Motor Vehicle offices in South Dakota are kind of small. Our DMV's don't even have suburbs, let alone exurbs!!

 

:P

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always wished they would fix their LTE layer calculations...the exaggeration is just so bad.

Totally agree with you according to their map I should have excellent LTE coverage at my house, instead of have none, but that is what WiFi is for.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the carriers maps are horrible, Sprint is a little more accurate then At&t, and T is 2nd to last, Big V is the absolute worse in my opinion at least with A,S, & T you CAN zoom into neighborhood level to at LEAST get a GENERAL idea of coverage. Big V alls they care to show you is yup your covered, just like those stupid "reality check" INACCURATE maps they pull all the time.  Again this is just MY OPINION. :)  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I long for the Sprint coverage map to resemble a cross between the C-Spire map (and some of its cool features) and the old Clear map.

The C-Spire map is great. That, plus tower locations, would be killer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I long for the Sprint coverage map to resemble a cross between the C-Spire map (and some of its cool features) and the old Clear map.

I liked the old Clear maps too BUT they ONLY wanted you to see the "market launched" tower locations only which until I came onto here it frankly sucked (just being honest).  There were times I went into a Clear 4G area but it was an area that was not an offical launch, so I had no idea where the tower/antennas were. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the carriers maps are horrible, Sprint is a little more accurate then At&t, and T is 2nd to last, Big V is the absolute worse in my opinion at least with A,S, & T you CAN zoom into neighborhood level to at LEAST get a GENERAL idea of coverage. Big V alls they care to show you is yup your covered, just like those stupid "reality check" INACCURATE maps they pull all the time. Again this is just MY OPINION. :)

Sprint's voice map is pretty close for my area. Now if only they can get that guy to do the LTE layer for the map.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's voice map is pretty close for my area. Now if only they can get that guy to do the LTE layer for the map.

I agree!  Thats why I rated them how I did S,A,T&V. I would of put them S,T,A &V (best to worst maps) but T-mobiles new "pink" awful map is HORRIBLE! There old maps were so much better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If sprint has the best map of the 4 then American carriers are some big ass liars

I agree! Thats why I rated them how I did S,A,T&V. I would of put them S,T,A &V (best to worst maps) but T-mobiles new "pink" awful map is HORRIBLE! There old maps were so much better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always wished they would fix their LTE layer calculations...the exaggeration is just so bad.

 

Even looking at an 800 LTE (band 26) run I made, the map shows LTE service continuing for another 1.5 miles in very hilly terrain.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are they going to update these maps for 800 MHz? I just switched from a iPhone 5s to 5 on the map and it showed no difference in coverage. When I know in fact, when LTE 800 is launched here it will be a considerable difference between the 2 phones.

 

Edit: I realize my market does not have 80 LTE yet. I assume that the coverage maps "Calculate" for 800 LTE?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea I also think that they shouldn't be showing coverage for 800cdma and 800let on the coverage maps when I for once have never picked up either. Which they probably think that they will have a good percentage of both deployed by year ends time from what I understand besides ibez. Just my opinion which I'm not premier sponsor but they better start having some massive updates to hit their goal by years end. I really hope they do or I would be happy with a lte roaming agreement with bluegrass celluar cause they have great coverage pretty much everywhere sprint doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spark Turbo by my house? I'm lucky to get a usable LTE signal on Band 25 if I'm indoors. Once I get the mythical Spark update on my N5 I'll walk around the neighborhood and see...

same here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's map shows a pocket of off-network roaming around my mom & dad's house 2 hours south of here, and yet 'fair' 4G LTE coverage most of the way around that pocket.

 

The biggest problem with this is the fact that the closest Sprint tower at all is a good 5-6 miles away in north Alabama as the crow flies, and even if the tower has very recently been LTE updated and the acceptance just hasn't made it to Robert yet, I can guarantee you there's no way LTE signal would make it up there much less even further north of it, because I constantly am flipping between the faintest of Sprint 3G data signals (even after being NV 3G complete) and roaming on Verizon at mom & dad's, and even a little over a mile back on the main highway (mom & dad's place is a little over a mile down a state road east of the main 4-lane), I can barely hold onto a Sprint 3G data connection there either.

 

Honestly, I don't know why anyone would bother wasting time with the Sprint map assuming they have any knowledge of Sensorly.com to begin with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Their offers have been crap recently, so this is just more evidence to not buy from T-Mobile. 
    • T-Mobile Will Soon Prevent Early Payoff Of Phones Receiving Bill Credits If you finance a phone with T-Mobile it will remain locked until paid off but now you won't be able to pay off early. If you don't currently purchase your phones from the manufacturer here is another reason it might be a good idea.
    • Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and could potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area.  — — — — —  Old permit for this new install expired but a new one was recently issued. It's gonna be similar to the site at 360 Forman St in Brooklyn Heights. Permit calls for only 3 antennas to be installed so I'm assuming it gonna be Band 2/41/66 and n25/41 only which is a bit of a downgrade from the now decommissioned full build that was on 871 7th Ave but in it's current state the nearest macro is a few blocks away and a small cell at Broadway and 55th is doing a lot of heavy lifting in the area so anything helps.  
    • Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...