Jump to content

Sprint to join Rural Operators Roaming Hub (CCA and RRPP thread)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Out of nowhere, Blue Wireless is participating in this. Blue's network has been pretty bad up until this point only offering 1x service. What I don't understand is that Blue's coverage is only cities. Cities that Sprint covers nonetheless. 

 

In New York:

  • Binghamton
  • Buffalo
  • Elmira
  • Jamestown
  • Dunkirk
  • Niagara Falls

In Pennsylvania:

  • Scranton
  • Wilkes-Barre

All have native Sprint coverage and some have 4G LTE. I'm in Scranton and we definitely have Network Vision rolled out here. Blue's plans beat everyone else though. $46 for everything including unlimited high-speed data. Blue definitely runs its own network too. 

1X is high speed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very awesome !!!  :D

CCAhighdefmap.png

 

 

Do not wet yourself with excitement.  That map reflects full CCA, not Sprint RRPP.

 

And I question the Montana footprint.  Is some of that Chinook Wireless?  It is going kaput soon.

 

AJ

I find it interesting that Hawaii is not on that map and yet on the CCA cell map it does show Hawaii. 

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1X is high speed?

I thought this part was weird too. Maybe 1xA with 4x speed instead of 4x voice capacity? That's still only 576 kbps. Is there some way to aggregate 1x channels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 1x high speed comments are about nk1 post they were saying 1x roaming bad. And they were looking forward to blue lte and questioning why when they cover the same area.

 

 

I was wandering about the us cellular and ntelos. Ntelos deal says no overbuilding I wonder if this will apply to us cellular and sprint roaming on LTE as native sprint. It will be nice I won't have to connect to a sprint 1x1900 tower 15 miles. By connect I mean standing in one spot trying not to move and holding the phone with limited fingers at a certain height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it interesting that Hawaii is not on that map and yet on the CCA cell map it does show Hawaii.

 

TS

The Hawaii CCA coverage is from Sprint and T-Mobile only.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this part was weird too. Maybe 1xA with 4x speed instead of 4x voice capacity? That's still only 576 kbps. Is there some way to aggregate 1x channels?

Not that i'm aware of of. I know EV-DO Rev B. can aggregate but I've never heard of aggregating 1X.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hawaii CCA coverage is from Sprint and T-Mobile only.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

I wonder if Mobi PCS in Hawaii was a CCA member before they decided to sell out their spectrum to VZW.  :scratch:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Report from a guy from HoFo.

 

 

My friend in college has CSpire (Cellular South) and came up here to visit recently and their phone showed native LTE service on 5x5 Sprint PCS band LTE, they were achieving the same exact speed's as me, just their IP address was out of Mississippi and CSpire. Haven't been to MS yet with my Sprint phone to see if it's the same roaming on them yet though.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some Sprint LTE coverage showed up on Sensorly outside Woodward and Alva in Western Oklahoma.  These are not Sprint corporate or affiliate coverages.  Some live CCA/RRPP LTE coverage starting to appear?

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some Sprint LTE coverage showed up on Sensorly outside Woodward and Alva in Western Oklahoma.  These are not Sprint corporate or affiliate coverages.  Some live CCA/RRPP LTE coverage starting to appear?

 

Robert

 

I noticed those spots show up last fall... I've always figured someone had an error with the Sensorly app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed those spots show up last fall... I've always figured someone had an error with the Sensorly app.

 

Wow, I just noticed them.  Guess I'm late to the party!

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, they were in the CCA Annoucement, but not the recent RRPP announcements.  So, either this is some new CCA coverage or new unannounced RRPP coverage.  Or testing.  Exciting.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I could think of out there in Glenn Gore land is Pioneer. I doubt they'd be RRPP or SMART partners after going to LTEiRA. Sorry I hate to burst bubbles, but the only way Sprint is going to compete there is through the merger and converted UMTS/LTE.

 

Sad part is that there are cable providers out there that could use SMART to make a wireless play. I don't think any are willing to bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I could think of out there in Glenn Gore land is Pioneer. I doubt they'd be RRPP or SMART partners after going to LTEiRA. Sorry I hate to burst bubbles, but the only way Sprint is going to compete there is through the merger and converted UMTS/LTE.

 

Sad part is that there are cable providers out there that could use SMART to make a wireless play. I don't think any are willing to bite.

 

Sprint did announce that they were working with Pioneer through the CCA.  So, why couldn't they also be a RRPP member?  They couldn't use the Verizon LTE network, but surely they could put anything they want on their towers on separate infrastructure from Verizon.

 

Robert

 

med_gallery_1_2_392569.png

Pioneer Cellular was shown by Masa as a Current Sprint LTE partner in March 2014

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the relationship between Pioneer and Sprint did end ugly (if I read things right), the new Sprint management has shown a much greater willingness to accommodate partners, so I wouldn't think that it would be too hard to get pioneer back on board, their legacy networks are already compatible with the Sprint network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I could think of out there in Glenn Gore land is Pioneer.

 

As I have made public previously, I do not care for Glenn Gore.  He signed up with Sprint so that he could get an iPhone, then used his service almost exclusively on a Sprint Rural Alliance partner.  When Pioneer ditched Sprint, Glenn also ditched Sprint -- because he was not happy that the PRL eventually limited his service to CDMA1X.  So, he went to VZW to get another iPhone and proceeded to use his service almost exclusively on a VZW LTE in Rural America partner.

 

This was all driven by the iPhone.  Seriously, the iPhone addiction some have displayed is ridiculous.  They go wherever the iPhone goes.  And they do not fault Apple for the game of keep away that it has/had played with numerous operators.

 

I called out Glenn on that a while back.  I said that the honest thing for him to do would be to support Pioneer for actually building out LTE coverage in his rural area, not to pay VZW and use Pioneer coverage nearly full time.  He said that he planned to do so -- that is, once Apple finally bestowed iPhone access upon Pioneer.  I wonder if anyone has asked Glenn if he actually followed through on that vow.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he did eventually move to Pioneer. For what it's worth, Verizon did eventually change the rules so that one could not sign up for service in an LTEiRA area.

 

Here's what happens when you enter in the zip code in Woodward, which is in the middle of Pioneer's LTEiRA area.

 

7amubuza.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he did eventually move to Pioneer. For what it's worth, Verizon did eventually change the rules so that one could not sign up for service in an LTEiRA area.

 

Here's what happens when you enter in the zip code in Woodward, which is in the middle of Pioneer's LTEiRA area.

 

Who knows how strictly that is enforced?  Provide a service area zip code within VZW native footprint but a billing zip code elsewhere, and VZW may not care.  With the elimination of long distance charges, people care little where their phone number is actually homed to its MSC.  They will move from one coast to another and keep the same number, caring not a whit that every one of their incoming calls gets boomeranged cross country from one MSC to another.  I find that modern obliviousness a bit disheartening.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So with the newest system update with the LG G2 it has a new selection in the ##DATA# hidden menu called LTE Available List which lists SID, NID, and BASE_ID's for all sites that it has found LTE from.

 

I looked around through this log and noticed that there are some with a SID of 5, which corresponds to US Cellular.  It appears that the phone is noticing the LTE, but isn't authenticating?  Could be a sign of things to come?

 

Screenshots and proof below:

 

Screenshot_2014-07-25-19-04-30.png

 

Snip20140725_2.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ (WiWavelength) Will be making a trip to Woodward, OK  to see whats going on (with a spectrum analyzer). Please show your support and donate to help with the costs (put Woodward trip in the note section of your donation.)  This could be just the beginning of potential CCA partner LTE coverage. (Check out sensorly if you dont know whats going on) 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...