Jump to content

Sprint to join Rural Operators Roaming Hub (CCA and RRPP thread)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

i hope they count the lte as native with those partners. Otherwise, why show the coverage if your limited to 100mb or 300mb (depending on plan) ? especially on LTE 

 

Meh.  Too many of you act as if you would even touch your handset on roaming LTE, then you would blow through your roaming data allotment.  Not the case.  But roaming LTE would provide advantages for even light, everyday uses, such as Web browsing, e-mail, etc.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. Too many of you act as if you would even touch your handset on roaming LTE, then you would blow through your roaming data allotment. Not the case. But roaming LTE would provide advantages for even light, everyday uses, such as Web browsing, e-mail, etc.

 

AJ

Agree. Id be satisfied with a full speed roaming cap and heavy throttling or a toss back to 1x after that.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Id be satisfied with a full speed roaming cap and heavy throttling or a toss back to 1x after that.

 

On "unlimited" data, a roaming cap is required because we have a lot of people whose attitude toward wireless data is the proverbial "if possible, then necessary."  If LTE is available, they have to use it out the wazoo.  Cannot…resist…streaming audio…watching video…and downloading...large files.

 

Ah, but they can resist.  They just choose not to exercise self restraint.  So, a roaming cap effectively imposes it for them.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A roaming cap should provide a reasonable amount of data for the LTE age. Say, Sprint and other providers provide 1GB of roaming over LTE. Anything over that gets throttled to 256 Kbps. Want more high-speed data? You can buy another LTE bucket of 1GB for $10. Simple pricing for roaming even a technical retard can understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A roaming cap should provide a reasonable amount of data for the LTE age. Say, Sprint and other providers provide 1GB of roaming over LTE. Anything over that gets throttled to 256 Kbps. Want more high-speed data? You can buy another LTE bucket of 1GB for $10. Simple pricing for roaming even a technical retard can understand.

 

My only quibble is for those on already capped plans like Framily.  Roaming should simply be part of the cap.  If you only have a 1gb of data in total then roaming data should just be part of it.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only quibble is for those on already capped plans like Framily. Roaming should simply be part of the cap. If you only have a 1gb of data in total then roaming data should just be part of it.

In the 1GB plans it would be. In 3 GB and Unlimited plans it would be at the 1 GB mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On "unlimited" data, a roaming cap is required because we have a lot of people whose attitude toward wireless data is the proverbial "if possible, then necessary."  If LTE is available, they have to use it out the wazoo.  Cannot…resist…streaming audio…watching video…and downloading...large files.

 

Ah, but they can resist.  They just choose not to exercise self restraint.  So, a roaming cap effectively imposes it for them.

 

My only critique of this argument is that devices can consume a lot of background data without the user knowing it, particularly since Android by default doesn't have any settings that allow fine-grained control of what happens while roaming versus native, just the global "data roaming" and "background data" settings. AFAICS you can't even set a hard data limit on roaming, just overall mobile usage. Maybe some manufacturer skins do better in this regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's to say this will be treated as pure roaming like CDMA roaming currently is? I'm betting this will be native coverage, especially since the companies in the announcement will be able to deploy on Sprint spectrum

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little bird told me of an even bigger announcement come mid summer that many have wanted for over a decade.

 

^_^

 

USCC LTE roaming treated as native?...   :D

 

Although, I guess that isn't something we could have wanted for over a decade since LTE wasn't around then.   :unsure:

 

Edit:  In case anyone can't tell...  I really want USCC LTE roaming.   :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only critique of this argument is that devices can consume a lot of background data without the user knowing it, particularly since Android by default doesn't have any settings that allow fine-grained control of what happens while roaming versus native, just the global "data roaming" and "background data" settings. AFAICS you can't even set a hard data limit on roaming, just overall mobile usage. Maybe some manufacturer skins do better in this regard.

What besides application updates from Google Play are going to get you anywhere near the current 100MB - 300MB roaming limit without any user knowledge? I get maybe 100-200MB of total background data use for an entire month, I don't see the roaming limit being much of a problem unless you are streaming or purposely downloading files.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the merger is passed, with a full net america(55+ carriers) would this be what  son needs to Market the new Sprint/Tmo as bigger/better than the other 2?? Coverage wise that should be a very large area... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC buyout would be my hope, but what do I know.

I have been wanting that for more than a decade, make it 15 years. In order of priority here is my wishful thinking list:

 

1. Completion band 25+26 buildout by end of 2015, period, end of story, no freaking excuses

2. USCC + CSpire buyout

3. 10MHz+10Mhz of 800MHz SMR with no IBEZ restrictions

4. Approval of the T-Mobile/Sprint merger

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only quibble is for those on already capped plans like Framily.  Roaming should simply be part of the cap.  If you only have a 1gb of data in total then roaming data should just be part of it.  

 

If people want all of a 1 GB quota to be usable for roaming, then they may need to be prepared to pay more for that 1 GB quota.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's to say this will be treated as pure roaming like CDMA roaming currently is? I'm betting this will be native coverage, especially since the companies in the announcement will be able to deploy on Sprint spectrum

 

"Unlimited" data with uncapped roaming does not work.  Users can then arbitrage the system, for example, paying Sprint Framily rates and having access to better Sprint devices but living permanently in USCC native coverage.  This happened frequently with Sprint affiliates and Rural Alliance partners.  Such situations were not good for Sprint nor for affiliates/partners.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...