Jump to content

Sprint/Clearwire Acquisition Discussion (Formerly: Dish offer to acquire Clearwire for $4.40 per share in cash.)


bucdenny

Recommended Posts

So what happens after Clearwire is purchased by Sprint? Will Clearwire keep it name or will it change to New Sprint? What about the stock?

 

During the transitional period, Clearwire will still exist, but I expect Sprint to fold Clearwire into New Sprint with all the customers and spectrum into 1 company. No need to operate 2 separate businesses, it's not cost effective.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Clearwire's CLEAR offering continue post-buyout?

 

its hard to fathom a scenario in which they offer service under the CLEAR brand post buyout. They will sell Sprint service, some devices happen to use the clearwire WiMAX network for the time being.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/softbank-set-to-invest-16-billion-at-sprint-20130707-00017

 

 

 

Softbank Corp. (9984.TO) is planning $16 billion in capital spending at Sprint Nextel Corp. over the next two years, President Masayoshi Son said in an interview, as his company seeks to make the U.S. mobile phone carrier a more serious challenge to top rivals, the Nikkei reported in its Monday morning edition.

 

Under Softbank, the pace of investment at Sprint will more than double. Most of the roughly Y1.6 trillion in spending will go toward base stations for Sprint's high-speed LTE network. Softbank is also adding base stations in Japan. It reckons its Sprint takeover, recently approved by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, will lower costs through economies of scale, not only in network infrastructure but also in smartphone procurement.

 

If the network isn't good, customers are going to complain, Mr. Son said, adding that Sprint will seek to pull even with Verizon in high-speed coverage in about two years.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm is Sprint's high speed LTE network Son is pushing the PCS FD-LTE or the Clearwire TD-LTE?

Does Softbank use any PCS in Japan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm is Sprint's high speed LTE network Son is pushing the PCS FD-LTE or the Clearwire TD-LTE?

Does Softbank use any PCS in Japan?

 

Son is going to push for LTE expansion no matter what frequency its on.  The fact is that PCS spectrum since its paired only accommodates for FD-LTE.  Son couldn't change it to TD-LTE even if he wanted to.  Son just wants to beat the crap out of Verizon and ATT.

 

Cmon Daque...do you really have to ask if Son is also pushing for Clearwire TD-LTE?  Why would Sprint/Softbank push so hard to get Clearwire if it didn't have the vision to deploy a more widespread 2.5 GHz 4G network (in this case LTE) that Clearwire failed to do so horribly back in 2010.  Right now we all have to be patient.  Once Sprint/softbank/clearwire merger becomes official with the Clearwire vote tomorrow we have to give the Softbank group at least 2 quarters to come up with a great 2.5 GHz TD-LTE plan to enhance the Sprint network.

 

Also Japan doesn't use the PCS spectrum like we use here in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's PCS LTE is not as fast as Verizon's LTE. Sprint has always said 2.5Ghz was just for high use areas, this seems to be the first public hint that after NV 1.0 finishes up the big push could be in a nation wide 2.5Ghz rollout and expansion is all I was getting at.  I hope they do it. I also hope it goes better than the WiMax deployment. I know they ran out of money but my gut thinks the problem ran deeper and centered in management decisions. I don't think Son would put up with any excuses under his leadership.  I totally agree with you that all the big economy of scale pluses come 2.5 Ghz TD phones and equipment deployment.

 

 

Oh I'm not saying Sprint's PCS LTE is not fast enough, I just saying its not as fast as big red.

The 2.5Ghz TD-LTE should be as fast or beat Verizon's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's PCS LTE is not as fast as Verizon's LTE. Sprint has always said 2.5Ghz was just for high use areas, this seems to be the first public hint that after NV 1.0 finishes up the big push could be in a nation wide 2.5Ghz rollout and expansion is all I was getting at. I hope they do it. I also hope it goes better than the WiMax deployment. I know they ran out of money but my gut thinks the problem ran deeper and centered in management decisions. I don't think Son would put up with any excuses under his leadership. I totally agree with you that all the big economy of scale pluses come 2.5 Ghz TD phones and equipment deployment.

 

 

Oh I'm not saying Sprint's PCS LTE is not fast enough, I just saying its not as fast as big red.

The 2.5Ghz TD-LTE should be as fast or beat Verizon's.

Faster theoretic speeds. However VZW actual LTE speeds are plummeting below Sprint in many markets.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 'robust network' and 'winning a speed test whore off with a limited data plan' are two very different things.   I want my unlimited access to maintain usability when other people in my area start realizing the fantastic value offered by Sprint.     

 

Its nice to name drop the big two when comparisons are made, but there is no value in trying to be like them in any way other than network expansion.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

pull even with Verizon in high-speed coverage....sounds like a rural build-out to me LOL (ONE CAN HOPE ) 

 

Well, it would not make financial sense, but if you want bragging rights, you have to pay for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They note in the article that the deal plans to close tomorrow, July 9th!  These next 2 days will be great for Sprint, to finally start heading forward in the right direction.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...