Jump to content

Sprint TD-LTE 2500/2600mhz Discussion


Recommended Posts

I think you still may be missing my point.  I have turned the WiFi off on my hotspot and directly tethering my laptop to my hotspot via USB, so there is no WiFi interface at all.  It's a direct connection.  When I do this with my VZW hotspot, I can sometimes hit 50Mbps at off peak times.  So this should allow me to exceed 35Mbps WiFi max I am hitting, as now my computer is directly connected to the hotspot's radios.

 

Robert

Like an external modem or NIC card from back in the day LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To sum up the issue for everyone reading, we have been unable to establish whether the Netgear tri band hotspot supports two spatial streams under 802.11n.  If not, then it is limited to 72 Mbps minus overhead.  And that would artificially cap its 20 MHz TDD LTE downlink throughput.  USB 2.0 tethering circumvents any Wi-Fi bottlenecks altogether.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you still may be missing my point.  I have turned the WiFi off on my hotspot and directly tethering my laptop to my hotspot via USB, so there is no WiFi interface at all.  It's a direct connection.  When I do this with my VZW hotspot, I can sometimes hit 50Mbps at off peak times.  So this should allow me to exceed 35Mbps WiFi max I am hitting, as now my computer is directly connected to the hotspot's radios.

 

Robert

 

I get it now.  I didn't know you could use the hotspot for tethering through the USB.  I thought the USB port was only used for charging.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To sum up the issue for everyone reading, we have been unable to establish whether the Netgear tri band hotspot supports two spatial streams under 802.11n.  If not, then it is limited to 72 Mbps minus overhead.  And that would artificially cap its 20 MHz TDD LTE downlink throughput.  USB 2.0 tethering circumvents any Wi-Fi bottlenecks altogether.

 

AJ

USB 2.0 has a maximum theoretical thru put of 480Mbps so it should not present a bottle neck

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

does the zing and mifi500 require special drivers to be installed for usb tethering?

 

I picked up a tri-fi hotspot (3g/wimax/lte) but it requires special drivers (shows up as cd rom with plugged into usb) which unfortunately won't install on any of my computers.

 

by contrast, my clearwire hotspot does not use any special drivers, it shows up as an RNDIS/ethernet gadget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you tether a phone to a mifi via USB with an OTG cable?

shouldn't need an OTG cable, just a standard microusb to regular usb cable, the same thing that probably came with the device and every phone in the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To piggyback on this. I have a WiMax phone and I have noticed that some sites in Austin appear to have higher bandwidth available now than a year ago. Part of that is, of course, due to people moving off WiMax but it is not a consistent change among all the towers here. I am fully expecting Austin to be in the next round of cities that Clearwire LTE is launched in. If only someone in Austin had a Triband hotspot to test. . .

 

I'll be in Austin with my MiFi hotspot in late September. I'll make sure to test the hell out of it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's official. I'm heading back to Denver tomorrow afternoon. I booked a room at the Renaissance hotel directly under the fastest TD-LTE 2600 site I encountered.

 

Robert

 

Alright, everyone. Let's throw some cash Robert's way via that Sponsorship link. It's the right thing to do!  :tu:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, everyone. Let's throw some cash Robert's way via that Sponsorship link. It's the right thing to do!  :tu:

 

Good call.  I am on board with my donation...

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

does the zing and mifi500 require special drivers to be installed for usb tethering?

 

I picked up a tri-fi hotspot (3g/wimax/lte) but it requires special drivers (shows up as cd rom with plugged into usb) which unfortunately won't install on any of my computers.

 

by contrast, my clearwire hotspot does not use any special drivers, it shows up as an RNDIS/ethernet gadget.

It did for me. On my VZW hotspot, it didn't. But it wouldn't work on my Netgear Triband hotspot when it did the auto install when I plugged it in. I had to go to the Netgear website download and install those drivers...and, voila!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, everyone. Let's throw some cash Robert's way via that Sponsorship link. It's the right thing to do! :tu:

Thanks for the donation. I will add it to the "Denver or Bust Fund."

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the donation. I will add it to the "Denver or Bust Fund."

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Hopefully you get to Denver and not "Bust"!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It did for me. On my VZW hotspot, it didn't. But it wouldn't work on my Netgear Triband hotspot when it did the auto install when I plugged it in. I had to go to the Netgear website download and install those drivers...and, voila! 

 

Ugh, I downloaded the mux drivers from netgear and get the same error; internal error 2738

 

http://kb.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/23394

 

edit; this registry edit fixed it

http://helpdesk.illinoisstate.edu/kb/1474/Error_Internal_Error_2738_when_installing_Cisco_VPN_client_on_Windows_Vista_or_Windows_7/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specifically, where did anyone say that Sprint is hitting every site with TD?

 

sent via my SIII on Tapatalk 4 beta

 

They said it days ago in the earning conference call.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USB 2.0 has a maximum theoretical thru put of 480Mbps so it should not present a bottle neck

Or 60 mbytes/second max. Robert already hit about 60% of that. Its all just bragging rights anyway I don't think anything really needs even 10 mbytes/second.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or 60 mbytes/second max. Robert already hit about 60% of that. Its all just bragging rights anyway I don't think anything really needs even 10 mbytes/second.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I can't tell you enough how many times my friends on AT&T and Verizon brag about how their network performs.  Once I get Clearwire LTE, I'll be able to put them in their place by bragging about my speeds AND unlimited data.  HA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or 60 mbytes/second max. Robert already hit about 60% of that. Its all just bragging rights anyway I don't think anything really needs even 10 mbytes/second.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

USB 2.0 hits 25 megabytes per second. I worked with getting raw pixel data off of camera sensors - automotive - and that's the max I ever saw sustained.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will brag too, I just mean its plenty fast. Bragging right do drive customers tho.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell you enough how many times my friends on AT&T and Verizon brag about how their network performs. Once I get Clearwire LTE, I'll be able to put them in their place by bragging about my speeds AND unlimited data. HA!

Just not in any big buildings or your basement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USB 2.0 hits 25 megabytes per second. I worked with getting raw pixel data off of camera sensors - automotive - and that's the max I ever saw sustained.

 

I have gotten 50-60Mbps on USB 2.0 before, no problem tethering my VZW hotspot.  I just hit 34Mbps this morning testing it out.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have gotten 50-60Mbps on USB 2.0 before, no problem tethering my VZW hotspot. I just hit 34Mbps this morning testing it out.

 

Robert

Yes, megaBits, not megaBytes.

 

25 megabytes/sec * 8 = 200 megabits per sec.

Edited by bluespruce1901
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...