Jump to content

Sprint TD-LTE 2500/2600mhz Discussion


Recommended Posts

I think you still may be missing my point.  I have turned the WiFi off on my hotspot and directly tethering my laptop to my hotspot via USB, so there is no WiFi interface at all.  It's a direct connection.  When I do this with my VZW hotspot, I can sometimes hit 50Mbps at off peak times.  So this should allow me to exceed 35Mbps WiFi max I am hitting, as now my computer is directly connected to the hotspot's radios.

 

Robert

Like an external modem or NIC card from back in the day LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To sum up the issue for everyone reading, we have been unable to establish whether the Netgear tri band hotspot supports two spatial streams under 802.11n.  If not, then it is limited to 72 Mbps minus overhead.  And that would artificially cap its 20 MHz TDD LTE downlink throughput.  USB 2.0 tethering circumvents any Wi-Fi bottlenecks altogether.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you still may be missing my point.  I have turned the WiFi off on my hotspot and directly tethering my laptop to my hotspot via USB, so there is no WiFi interface at all.  It's a direct connection.  When I do this with my VZW hotspot, I can sometimes hit 50Mbps at off peak times.  So this should allow me to exceed 35Mbps WiFi max I am hitting, as now my computer is directly connected to the hotspot's radios.

 

Robert

 

I get it now.  I didn't know you could use the hotspot for tethering through the USB.  I thought the USB port was only used for charging.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To sum up the issue for everyone reading, we have been unable to establish whether the Netgear tri band hotspot supports two spatial streams under 802.11n.  If not, then it is limited to 72 Mbps minus overhead.  And that would artificially cap its 20 MHz TDD LTE downlink throughput.  USB 2.0 tethering circumvents any Wi-Fi bottlenecks altogether.

 

AJ

USB 2.0 has a maximum theoretical thru put of 480Mbps so it should not present a bottle neck

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

does the zing and mifi500 require special drivers to be installed for usb tethering?

 

I picked up a tri-fi hotspot (3g/wimax/lte) but it requires special drivers (shows up as cd rom with plugged into usb) which unfortunately won't install on any of my computers.

 

by contrast, my clearwire hotspot does not use any special drivers, it shows up as an RNDIS/ethernet gadget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you tether a phone to a mifi via USB with an OTG cable?

shouldn't need an OTG cable, just a standard microusb to regular usb cable, the same thing that probably came with the device and every phone in the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To piggyback on this. I have a WiMax phone and I have noticed that some sites in Austin appear to have higher bandwidth available now than a year ago. Part of that is, of course, due to people moving off WiMax but it is not a consistent change among all the towers here. I am fully expecting Austin to be in the next round of cities that Clearwire LTE is launched in. If only someone in Austin had a Triband hotspot to test. . .

 

I'll be in Austin with my MiFi hotspot in late September. I'll make sure to test the hell out of it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's official. I'm heading back to Denver tomorrow afternoon. I booked a room at the Renaissance hotel directly under the fastest TD-LTE 2600 site I encountered.

 

Robert

 

Alright, everyone. Let's throw some cash Robert's way via that Sponsorship link. It's the right thing to do!  :tu:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, everyone. Let's throw some cash Robert's way via that Sponsorship link. It's the right thing to do!  :tu:

 

Good call.  I am on board with my donation...

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

does the zing and mifi500 require special drivers to be installed for usb tethering?

 

I picked up a tri-fi hotspot (3g/wimax/lte) but it requires special drivers (shows up as cd rom with plugged into usb) which unfortunately won't install on any of my computers.

 

by contrast, my clearwire hotspot does not use any special drivers, it shows up as an RNDIS/ethernet gadget.

It did for me. On my VZW hotspot, it didn't. But it wouldn't work on my Netgear Triband hotspot when it did the auto install when I plugged it in. I had to go to the Netgear website download and install those drivers...and, voila!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, everyone. Let's throw some cash Robert's way via that Sponsorship link. It's the right thing to do! :tu:

Thanks for the donation. I will add it to the "Denver or Bust Fund."

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the donation. I will add it to the "Denver or Bust Fund."

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Hopefully you get to Denver and not "Bust"!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It did for me. On my VZW hotspot, it didn't. But it wouldn't work on my Netgear Triband hotspot when it did the auto install when I plugged it in. I had to go to the Netgear website download and install those drivers...and, voila! 

 

Ugh, I downloaded the mux drivers from netgear and get the same error; internal error 2738

 

http://kb.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/23394

 

edit; this registry edit fixed it

http://helpdesk.illinoisstate.edu/kb/1474/Error_Internal_Error_2738_when_installing_Cisco_VPN_client_on_Windows_Vista_or_Windows_7/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specifically, where did anyone say that Sprint is hitting every site with TD?

 

sent via my SIII on Tapatalk 4 beta

 

They said it days ago in the earning conference call.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USB 2.0 has a maximum theoretical thru put of 480Mbps so it should not present a bottle neck

Or 60 mbytes/second max. Robert already hit about 60% of that. Its all just bragging rights anyway I don't think anything really needs even 10 mbytes/second.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or 60 mbytes/second max. Robert already hit about 60% of that. Its all just bragging rights anyway I don't think anything really needs even 10 mbytes/second.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I can't tell you enough how many times my friends on AT&T and Verizon brag about how their network performs.  Once I get Clearwire LTE, I'll be able to put them in their place by bragging about my speeds AND unlimited data.  HA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or 60 mbytes/second max. Robert already hit about 60% of that. Its all just bragging rights anyway I don't think anything really needs even 10 mbytes/second.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

USB 2.0 hits 25 megabytes per second. I worked with getting raw pixel data off of camera sensors - automotive - and that's the max I ever saw sustained.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will brag too, I just mean its plenty fast. Bragging right do drive customers tho.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell you enough how many times my friends on AT&T and Verizon brag about how their network performs. Once I get Clearwire LTE, I'll be able to put them in their place by bragging about my speeds AND unlimited data. HA!

Just not in any big buildings or your basement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USB 2.0 hits 25 megabytes per second. I worked with getting raw pixel data off of camera sensors - automotive - and that's the max I ever saw sustained.

 

I have gotten 50-60Mbps on USB 2.0 before, no problem tethering my VZW hotspot.  I just hit 34Mbps this morning testing it out.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have gotten 50-60Mbps on USB 2.0 before, no problem tethering my VZW hotspot. I just hit 34Mbps this morning testing it out.

 

Robert

Yes, megaBits, not megaBytes.

 

25 megabytes/sec * 8 = 200 megabits per sec.

Edited by bluespruce1901
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...