Jump to content

HTC ONE user thread


jegillis

Recommended Posts

4.3 rolling out to Sprint today. Tweeted out by Jason Mackenzie. If you aren't running a custom ROM check your update!

 

Update zip over at XDA

 

https://twitter.com/JasonMacHTC/status/385442295731875840

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 4

Updating over TD-LTE! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get GCI and it is correct. I have not seen PCi.

Cool cool, thanks for reporting back. PCI is the actual LTE serving cell ID. For us HTC folks we get the GCI and not PCI but Samsung, LG and I believe iPhone get PCI and not GCI. There is a very nice patch on CM that gives us HTC One folks both.

 

Actually, if I am rooted and on a stock rom, will it unroot me?

I'm not 100% sure but I don't think the update can/will even be applied because your bootloader is unlocked. The way it used to work is you had to oem lock first then you could apply. If you are NOT s-off, you'll have to do but that way if you want the updated radios. If you don't care about radios and aren't s-off, just flash the stock rooted rom once it's available.

 

Sent from my d3rpONE using Tapatalk 4

 

uploadfromtaptalk1380762704718.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool cool, thanks for reporting back. PCI is the actual LTE serving cell ID. For us HTC folks we get the GCI and not PCI but Samsung, LG and I believe iPhone get PCI and not GCI. There is a very nice patch on CM that gives us HTC One folks both.

 

 

I'm not 100% sure but I don't think the update can/will even be applied because your bootloader is unlocked. The way it used to work is you had to oem lock first then you could apply. If you are NOT s-off, you'll have to do but that way if you want the updated radios. If you don't care about radios and aren't s-off, just flash the stock rooted rom once it's available.

 

Sent from my d3rpONE using Tapatalk 4

I am rooted with S-Off on stock rom....OTA downloaded and installed correctly. Went to bootloader and verified that I am still rooted and s-off'd.

10062502065_a0ea909606_z_d.jpg10062595213_7ef608f778_z_d.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an FYI with anybody S-OFF'd and custom ROM. If you are still running TWRP 2.5.0.0 (like I was), once you flash the firmware zip with fastboot containing everything but HBOOT, Recovery, and Boot, you will run into a unresponsive touchscreen. There is a new touchscreen update in the firmware. After flashing the firmware zip I rebooted back into bootloader to get into to recovery to flash OMJ's stock rooted. TWRP was unresponsive so I had to hold down power and vol down to get out of it. Booted system and it was unresponsive too. Had to again hold power and vol down til it quit flashing the home and back lights, let off and hold again to get back into bootloader. Downloaded TWRP 2.6.3.0, zipped it up and flashed through flashboot. Got back to recovery and now responsive.

 

tl;dr

 

Update TWRP before flashing firmware zip and ROM.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing that's wrong with the new Google maps, Talk, Slacker, Sensorly, etc.. All going backwards.

Why do these apps need to be updated, even overhauled seemingly every 90 days? It is just change for the sake of change; newer must be better.

 

Just leave well enough alone for a couple of years...

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they have changed the signal bars to actually reflect eHRPD or LTE.

 

For instance, I'm sitting in my basement with 1 bar with a -86 1xRTT signal and a -112 LTE signal.

 

If i get my One to lose LTE signal and drop back to eHRPD, i've got 4 or 5 bars with a -86 eHRPD signal.

 

Anybody else notice this?

 

k5zy.png

 

e2p4.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they have changed the signal bars to actually reflect eHRPD or LTE.

 

For instance, I'm sitting in my basement with 1 bar with a -86 1xRTT signal and a negative -112 LTE signal.

 

If i get my One to lose LTE signal and drop back to eHRPD, i've got 4 or 5 bars with a -86 eHRPD signal.

 

Anybody else notice this?

 

k5zy.png

 

e2p4.png

Interesting.... I switched to T-Mobile and I noticed that it does this also. When it's on LTE the bars show the strength of the LTE signal and not the GSM signal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any of you that are noticing this with the bars, are you running OMJs ROM right now? I'm wondering if the Qualcom Location service FC'ing is the culprit.

 

Also people who are stock let me know your results if you are able to replicate.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 4

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an FYI with anybody S-OFF'd and custom ROM. If you are still running TWRP 2.5.0.0 (like I was), once you flash the firmware zip with fastboot containing everything but HBOOT, Recovery, and Boot, you will run into a unresponsive touchscreen. There is a new touchscreen update in the firmware. After flashing the firmware zip I rebooted back into bootloader to get into to recovery to flash OMJ's stock rooted. TWRP was unresponsive so I had to hold down power and vol down to get out of it. Booted system and it was unresponsive too. Had to again hold power and vol down til it quit flashing the home and back lights, let off and hold again to get back into bootloader. Downloaded TWRP 2.6.3.0, zipped it up and flashed through flashboot. Got back to recovery and now responsive.

 

tl;dr

 

Update TWRP before flashing firmware zip and ROM.

And this is why I always take my time flashing any major release, thanks for the heads up bro.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing that's wrong with the new Google maps, Talk, Slacker, Sensorly, etc.. All going backwards.

Crap! I forgot about maps....is there a way to go back to the old Maps app?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...