Jump to content

SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths


mikejeep

Recommended Posts

Sometimes the location is way off. Sometimes it says I'm connecting to a city that is like a 45 minute drive away. So I'm curious on why this happens. Thanks. The app is awesome

 

Location is driven by the device, not the app, it's just translating what the device is reporting.  There seems to be a GPS bug with the G2, hopefully it'll be fixed with update but who knows.  It's not a huge deal for me and doesn't happen all the time but I know others are reporting it and I have experienced first hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to comment on that last stat, as it boggles my mind.  The vast majority of SignalCheck Lite users actually uninstall it?  Why is the Lite retention rate only 30 percent?  Or is that low retention rate simply characteristic of free apps in general?

 

That is characteristic of free apps in general, and actually is above average. According to this study, 22% of apps are only used once -- and that doesn't necessarily mean it was uninstalled. That study also blends free and paid apps, and I would expect paid apps to have a much higher retention rate (as SignalCheck does). Also, apps like SignalCheck that have a separate paid version take a hit here; a lot of Pro users likely started by trying Lite, and uninstalled Lite after buying Pro. Even if only half of Pro users ever tried Lite, that's still at least a few percentage points.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes the location is way off. Sometimes it says I'm connecting to a city that is like a 45 minute drive away. So I'm curious on why this happens. Thanks. The app is awesome

Location is driven by the device, not the app, it's just translating what the device is reporting.  There seems to be a GPS bug with the G2, hopefully it'll be fixed with update but who knows.  It's not a huge deal for me and doesn't happen all the time but I know others are reporting it and I have experienced first hand. 

 

SignalCheck doesn't actually use any location features or GPS right now; the only "location" is the BSL identifying the base station you are connecting to. This is set by the wireless provider, and this question comes up all the time.. basically, Sprint uses an offset in many markets. See here: http://www.bluelinepc.com/signalcheck/help/#bslwrong

 

The other possibility is that you are on 1X 800, and are actually connecting to a far away site because the signal travels much farther than you are used to.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I can take screen shots if you like on the location it says and where I am? For instance I was in north Westminster on like 120th and federal and it said I was connected to castle rock. I don't think I was on 800. So anyways I shouldn't really rely on the location it says right now due to the LG g2 issues? It does for the most part get the location right. Thank you for the quick responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I can take screen shots if you like on the location it says and where I am? For instance I was in north Westminster on like 120th and federal and it said I was connected to castle rock. I don't think I was on 800. So anyways I shouldn't really rely on the location it says right now due to the LG g2 issues? It does for the most part get the location right. Thank you for the quick responses.

 

Read this:

 

http://www.bluelinepc.com/signalcheck/help/#bslwrong

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBM and Signal Check in multi-view together on note 2.

 

Cool stuff.. every time I see a shot of multi-view, I'm slightly jealous it's only a Samsung thing.

 

Your screen shot reminded me about something I meant to share earlier. I received some information about the "Site Hint" field.. markets that don't seem to show it properly (i.e. "Sector A" instead of 1/2/3) use a different scheme, where the sector isn't the last hex digit, but instead is represented by the third digit from the right (so Sector 3 in your screenshot). Verizon uses this same format as well. I am working on adding this in a future update. Big improvements in the Reset feature coming too (sorry, you still need root on 4.2+ :().

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool stuff.. every time I see a shot of multi-view, I'm slightly jealous it's only a Samsung thing.

 

Your screen shot reminded me about something I meant to share earlier. I received some information about the "Site Hint" field.. markets that don't seem to show it properly (i.e. "Sector A" instead of 1/2/3) use a different scheme, where the sector isn't the last hex digit, but instead is represented by the third digit from the right (so Sector 3 in your screenshot). Verizon uses this same format as well. I am working on adding this in a future update. Big improvements in the Reset feature coming too (sorry, you still need root on 4.2+ :().

 

-Mike

Ericsson has switched to using 9 A B on our site sector hints. 9 is alpha and so forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool stuff.. every time I see a shot of multi-view, I'm slightly jealous it's only a Samsung thing.

 

Your screen shot reminded me about something I meant to share earlier. I received some information about the "Site Hint" field.. markets that don't seem to show it properly (i.e. "Sector A" instead of 1/2/3) use a different scheme, where the sector isn't the last hex digit, but instead is represented by the third digit from the right (so Sector 3 in your screenshot). Verizon uses this same format as well. I am working on adding this in a future update. Big improvements in the Reset feature coming too (sorry, you still need root on 4.2+ :().

 

-Mike

and a custom LG Rom thing.... :Duploadfromtaptalk1389225252217.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 15 January 2011

 

I figured I would see LTE before WiMax too. She may have just seen the 4G icon as it was trying to connect and thought it was connected...

Hmm.. Wonder if I could port that to the N5..hmm..too many Damn projects already. But what's another right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ericsson has switched to using 9 A B on our site sector hints. 9 is alpha and so forth.

 

Should they really be 9 A B? Or is SignalCheck just showing the wrong value? The information I have about this alternate method of identifying the sector was specific to the Boston market (but thought to be used elsewhere on Sprint's network), and proved to be correct here.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 15 January 2011

 

I figured I would see LTE before WiMax too. She may have just seen the 4G icon as it was trying to connect and thought it was connected...

Hmm.. Wonder if I could port that to the N5..hmm..too many Damn projects already. But what's another right?

 

Tapatalk strikes again? :P

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should they really be 9 A B? Or is SignalCheck just showing the wrong value? The information I have about this alternate method of identifying the sector was specific to the Boston market (but thought to be used elsewhere on Sprint's network), and proved to be correct here.

 

-Mike

Since the NID consolidation they renumbered all the BIDs luckily the PN's have stayed the same for years and years. The alpha sector is 27849, Beta and gamma are incremented by one. That converts to 9, A, and B. Just figured it was a new way kind of like how AT&T here with Ericsson equipment uses 0F, 10, and 11 for the GCI last two digits on the same site and the PCI's are not offset by 169 like Sprint Ericsson market equipment, they actually increment by one.

 

I did do a bit of spatial analysis and found Sprint numbered the the cell IDs in a geographic fashion instead of a cascade ID fashion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[edited for clarity and to correct 0F to 00F]

 

Mike,

 

Band 41 details that might help you separate it out (identify it).

 

Initially I though these MCC & MNC were unique to band 41, but I no longer believe that to be true

 

- I recently put 311 490 in wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_network_codes_in_the_United_States#MCC_311  It totally dominates the traffic.

 

- I am also seeing 310 120 in band 41

 

***but then I also see both of these in Band 25 LTE

 

 

 

GCIs -- this really seems to be the main difference

 

- All Columbus market band 41 TD-LTE GCI starts with "00F"

- I don't know what other markets see in terms of Band 41 TD-LTE GCI

 

Hopefully this helps

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 41 details that might help you separate it out (identify it).

 

Initially I though these MCC & MNC were unique to band 41, but I no longer believe that to be true

 

- I recently put 311 490 in wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_network_codes_in_the_United_States#MCC_311  It totally dominates the traffic.

 

- I am also seeing 310 120 in band 41

 

***but then I also see both of these in Band 25 LTE

 

GCIs -- this really seems to be the main difference

 

- All Columbus market band 41 TD-LTE GCI starts with "0F"

- I don't know what other markets see in terms of Band 41 TD-LTE GCI

 

Thanks. Yeah, I don't think the MCC-MNC is a great indicator, at least not right now. Earlier today, I posted something in a Premier Sponsor thread that would be worthy of mention over here..

 

I was able to confirm with Sprint today that Band 25 and 26 are only using PLMN (MCC-MNC) 310-120. Band 41 is on 311-490 or 311-870. All of this is subject to change in the future if they decide to consolidate IDs. However, I also know that Virgin Mobile users see Band 25 on 311-490.

 

So while this information is helpful and can point people in the right direction, it's not absolute. I guess if you see 311-970, you're on band 41.

 

As far as the GCI goes, that's a great observation and something I hope forms a pattern nationally. We'll see what happens once more people start connecting to it with devices that can show the GCI.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are either of you guys hitting the Reset Connection button (or menu option)? For some reason, the N5 is suddenly having issues with this lately.. but not every time, it's inconsistent. I've been seeing it myself and receiving reports from others. It will reset the connection, but the app freezes and must be force closed. Once you open it back up again, it works fine. The crash reports indicate it is not crashing at a specific point in the code, it's totally random -- which makes me think it's something external causing the issue.

 

I have made improvements to the Reset code that will be included in the next update, but I don't think it helped the crashing. Wondering if there was a recent Google Play Services update that is causing this. That is the only thing I am aware of that updates itself in the background without any user knowledge.

 

EDIT: Make sure you are on the latest version (4.22).. it fixes the issue where the background service was getting killed off. That caused the icons/widget to freeze no matter what your connection status was.

 

-Mike

 

I've noticed that SignalCheck is crashing more often on my Nexus 5 too. And I'm on stock Android, not even rooted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that SignalCheck is crashing more often on my Nexus 5 too. And I'm on stock Android, not even rooted.

 

It doesn't seem to be widespread, but it has definitely spiked up over the past week or two. Seems to happen when the data connection is dropped. I'm still looking into it; if anyone notices a pattern or has any ideas, feel free to post. Unfortunately nothing is happening in logcat, so it's tricky to figure out the exact situation that triggers it.

 

Oh, and to distract everyone from talking about crashes.. guess who stayed up until 5:30am getting site logging working in his app!? This guy..  B)

 

Stay tuned!

 

-Mike

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SignalCheck crashes at least twice a week on my stock Galaxy S3, I've noticed that it crashes when switching from 3G to LTE or back from LTE or 3G, especially when your on the edge of an LTE signal when it keeps flip flopping back and forth.  99.9% of the time I know its going to crash because the signal data in the notification bar hangs up and the app is displaying totally different signal data.....oops I talked about crashes :unsure: But hey, SignalCheck is still the best app for hunting LTE and keeping your eye on your signal, its a must have app!  :tu:    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem to be widespread, but it has definitely spiked up over the past week or two. Seems to happen when the data connection is dropped. I'm still looking into it; if anyone notices a pattern or has any ideas, feel free to post. Unfortunately nothing is happening in logcat, so it's tricky to figure out the exact situation that triggers it.

 

Oh, and to distract everyone from talking about crashes.. guess who stayed up until 5:30am getting site logging working in his app!? This guy..  B)

 

Stay tuned!

 

-Mike

 

Most of my problems are when I use Airplane Mode to try to force my phone back onto LTE in known LTE areas when the standard scan doesn't re-acquire LTE.

 

And congrats on the site logging!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- All Columbus market band 41 TD-LTE GCI starts with "0F"

- I don't know what other markets see in terms of Band 41 TD-LTE GCI

 

Hopefully this helps

 

The St. Louis 2600/Band 41 thread has a large number of Band 41 sites identified, and somewhere back about 2 or 3 months ago, I posted a formula for converting the Cell ID from a Zing hotspot to the Site ID.  The Cell ID is reported in decimal, the Site ID is hexadecimal, and there is an offset representing the "market".  The method worked for most St. Louis sites, but there seemed to be 2 or 3 random renegade sites.

 

I have done similar conversions for Robert's initial Denver sighting, for Minneapolis, and on a somewhat larger scale in Chicago (posting in the appropriate threads as I went), but I don't remember the links off the top of my head.

 

I realize that this is off-topic (sorry, Mike), but if anyone is interested, I could post the ID method I found -- Probably best in one of the 2600 threads.

 

When the tri-band phones finally start routinely recognizing B41 and reporting it through Signal Check, we should be able to figure out coverages very comprehensively.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...When the tri-band phones finally start routinely recognizing B41 and reporting it through Signal Check, we should be able to figure out coverages very comprehensively.

 

tommym65,

 

Thanks for your many posts, including various calculations.

 

We already have most of the Columbus Phase 1 Band 41 TD-LTE sites identified with GCI and PCI:

 

the blue icons are Band 41 TD-LTE:

http://cbus.digiblur.com/ClearNV.html

 

GCI and PCI are in the NV Clear Tab, columns J to M:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnlPP997Kb82dDBTaWJ5UGdQRDlHVTNRSmhlRk1DdFE&usp=sharing#gid=22

 

even the ones when have yet to find/finish:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4825-columbus-market-mapspreadsheet-premier-edition/page-8&do=findComment&comment=264077

 

These were all found with SCP even through it was extremely difficult to work with (fixed fully in 4.22) or 4G Signal Detector (accurate, but your are mostly blind in the field, best for large batches). (I did see the maps from St. Louis, but did not see GCI and PCI details for Band 41)

 

How do the Columbus GCI and PCI compare with your calculated GCI PCI from the various cites?

 

Many thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...