Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands Market


Gab2012

Recommended Posts

Thanks Robert.

Well I currently live in front of the ocean in Manati. I have noticed a dramatic increase in signal strength in the past week or so. I can sometimes see full bars for up to an hour but then intermittently it drops to 1 or 2 bars or just grayed out altogether! In the past if I got 2 bars I considered that a good day!! Last night I ran a speed test late at night with full bars and got the following:

Ping: 245ms / 1298kbps download / 460kbps upload (I had selected a server in Manati).

 

Is the signal dropping to 1 or 2 bars indicative that work continues on the towers, and should that stabilize at some point or will I just have to live with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Robert.

Well I currently live in front of the ocean in Manati. I have noticed a dramatic increase in signal strength in the past week or so. I can sometimes see full bars for up to an hour but then intermittently it drops to 1 or 2 bars or just grayed out altogether! In the past if I got 2 bars I considered that a good day!! Last night I ran a speed test late at night with full bars and got the following:

Ping: 245ms / 1298kbps download / 460kbps upload (I had selected a server in Manati).

 

Is the signal dropping to 1 or 2 bars indicative that work continues on the towers' date=' and should that stabilize at some point or will I just have to live with it?[/quote']

 

Usually if your signal drops suddenly it is because your device switched towers, to a further site. If the closer site is being worked on is having traffic issues, that can happen.

 

But note that your signal indicator only shows you your voice signal strength, not data. It is possible that your phone changed towers for voice but stayed on the same site for 3G data. Your phone can connect to two different sites at once and as many as 3 when connected to LTE. All would have different signal strengths.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3g.png

 

I took this on various areas in Ponce. As you can see, the results are quite nice but there were some spots where it just went downhill.

 

The 3 mps were with 4g on.

Edited by JeanPi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this happens to you when connected to nv sites?

Network id 200

 

equgupy9.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

in all nv towers that i see in PR it says network id 200

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well then the tower in Carolina has real problems.. I cannot get anything above 100kbps..

 

Thanks

mabe the tower is with the new panels activated but the backhaul isnt ready yet

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

in all nv towers that i see in PR it says network id 200

 

NIDs are a way to break up SIDs. So they can apply different PRL rules to each NID. It's not done too often though.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

NIDs are a way to break up SIDs. So they can apply different PRL rules to each NID. It's not done too often though.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

Talking on PRL, i'm using the one you send me, still no EHRDP on nv sites, i will let you know as soon I catch something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Talking on PRL, i'm using the one you send me, still no EHRDP on nv sites, i will let you know as soon I catch something.

 

Ehrpd works even on non lte prls.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow still absolutely NOTHING in the metro area -_-

 

They are deliberately doing every site in PR before they hit the metro area.

 

Wouldnt it be smart for them to do the

most heavily populated areas first and then the rural zones?

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow still absolutely NOTHING in the metro area -_-

 

They are deliberately doing every site in PR before they hit the metro area.

 

Wouldnt it be smart for them to do the

most heavily populated areas first and then the rural zones?

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III

 

It doesn't surprise me, as this has been the pattern in other markets. Chicago and Boston, for example. In PR, its close to 50% the sites that are in the metro area and 50% in the rest of the island. Almost all of the Western part (North and South) of the island except Mayaguez is complete. Once everything outside of the metro area is completed, all those crews can concentrate on it. It would not surprise me that the PR markets is fully completed ahead of schedule.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It doesn't surprise me, as this has been the pattern in other markets. Chicago and Boston, for example. In PR, its close to 50% the sites that are in the metro area and 50% in the rest of the island. Almost all of the Western part (North and South) of the island except Mayaguez is complete. Once everything outside of the metro area is completed, all those crews can concentrate on it. It would not surprise me that the PR markets is fully completed ahead of schedule.

 

Why are they leaving Mayagûez for last....? :huh: :mellow: :(

 

posted using my super FK'N htcEVO4gLTE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

by my count, and the data in this site, 105 of 252 (42%) sites in Puerto Rico have been upgraded/accepted by Sprint over the past two months, 58% of the sites left.

 

that rate is not bad, almost half of all the sites in the island in two months!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldnt it be smart for them to do the

most heavily populated areas first and then the rural zones? On the contrary that was the others( att and openmobile)did. They started lte in san juan, ponce and mayaguez .Would be wise to change that pattern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Two s24 ultras, both say fully up to date. One has T-Mobile and Verizon network, Service provider software version 17, carrier config version 2, and few apps [google play system March 1], other with T-Mobile, Dish Rainbow Sim, Verizon Network (inactive), Service provider software version 19, no carrier config, and many apps [Google play system April 1]
    • Since T-Mobile is testing the fiber waters for a time when FWA needs to be paired back, here is an article comparing the two costs (performance differences not mentioned): https://www.fierce-network.com/broadband/nextlink-ceo-compares-fixed-wireless-fiber. 
    • Checked and found a 2.7mb Google Play System 'security' update pending.   Post install the update date still showing April 1st however.
    • The May security update is out.
    • A new SignalCheck Pro update is now available on Google Play! Notable changes: Improved duplicate LTE GCI cleanup function. Duplicates with the greater number of recorded connection 'hits' will now be kept. Duplicate entries appear for a variety of reasons but can cause neighbor cell notes to display improperly. Strongly recommend running this cleanup function occasionally. Improved site note logging functionality. Better matching of co-located cells and prior Sprint sites. Overhauled display functions to fully re-sync all information when reopening app or with swipe-down gesture. The swipe-down gesture now essentially restarts the core functions of the app. Other changes: Added 5G-NR band to notification pulldown title. Added accent colors for additional wireless providers. Added option to disable street address geocoding when editing a site note; coordinates will populate instead. Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved identification of unregistered 5G-NR cells. Improved LTE PLMN identification on some devices. Resolved issue with log import proceeding when log backup fails. Resolved issue with some 5G-NR connections displaying improper band. Resolved issue with some 5G-NR neighbor cells displaying improper band. Updated internal libraries. As always, I appreciate everyone's support. Dual SIM bugs are *still* being ironed out but it is a priority to resolve. Thanks!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...