Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

I was on the train & i got LTE inside the subway station. The station was 47-50th Street, I was caught off guard by it truthfully. My mom even got a phone call & it was clear. Sprint FTW

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was able to lock onto a new band 41 and band 26 tower. Around marble hill Manhattan/Bronx

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was on the train & i got LTE inside the subway station. The station was 47-50th Street, I was caught off guard by it truthfully. My mom even got a phone call & it was clear. Sprint FTW

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ive had great success underground in midtown, at least 10 stations with excellent service..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's coming from the cluster that was launched near my school.

That was my thought exactly...Signal definitely came from a distance considering the open air of the west side hwy and weak signal..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B25, capacity is not an issue underground, I get about 15mb/sec in most stations at all times.

Capacity I didn't think would've been an issue. Just surprised you had a stable connection underground on b25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Capacity I didn't think would've been an issue. Just surprised you had a stable connection underground on b25

Multiple antennas underground to cover each station, its being built out by transit wireless in conjunction with all the major carriers. So the connection is perfectly stable because your standing very close to the antennas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say though that I notice that my phone drops signal in the tunnels a bit before Verizon does. By that I mean, while the train is leaving the station and enters the tunnel, my phone loses the Sprint signal and then roams on Verizon for a bit longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say though that I notice that my phone drops signal in the tunnels a bit before Verizon does. By that I mean, while the train is leaving the station and enters the tunnel, my phone loses the Sprint signal and then roams on Verizon for a bit longer.

I guess because im on .15 radio which holds LTE like a beast, i dont see it roam to Verizon..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went on a small field trip with my girls G2, from 33rd st park ave walked across to 5th ave, then down to 23rd st, then 8th ave, walked back up to 42nd and 8th held a B41 connection through 90% of the walk. (Had two occasions of weird Hand offs, which left me with no data for about 20 seconds then shunted me to 3G, quick airplane mode toggle put me back on B41)  Then walked into the 42nd st train station, perfect hand off from B41 to B25 underground. 

 

Throughout the whole walk, averaged just over 25/mb sec. Once everything is in place and tuned properly (maybe a radio revision for the odd hand offs)  This network will be unstoppable! 

 

Personally getting tired of waiting on Google to release the update for the N5, as more  B25 towers come online its becoming more and more difficult for the N5 to connect to any B41 no matter what radio version im on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not just the nexus 5. I think it depends on the neighborhood as I won't connect to band 41 or 26 without a mild signal disturbance to band 25 the network is not prioritizing band 41 it seems as of yet in some places. The site that I get my home coverage from doesn't appear to be upgraded with any band 41 equipment just the sites by the above ground train station. There is a site further away that I picked up on, before from my room. But the signal was so week it shunted back down to band 25 again. So till all sites are online it will be variable load balancing as if u hook on to band 41 consistently in some locals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not just the nexus 5. I think it depends on the neighborhood as I won't connect to band 41 or 26 without a mild signal disturbance to band 25 the network is not prioritizing band 41 it seems as of yet in some places. The site that I get my home coverage from doesn't appear to be upgraded with any band 41 equipment just the sites by the above ground train station. There is a site further away that I picked up on, before from my room. But the signal was so week it shunted back down to band 25 again. So till all sites are online it will be variable load balancing as if u hook on to band 41 consistently in some locals.

The difference is the G2 gets it everywhere, my N5 does not pick up B41 at all..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have lg nexus 5, g2 varying radio performance. The HTC duo in the max, and one m8 with simalar performance characteristics!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have lg nexus 5, g2 varying radio performance. The HTC duo in the max, and one m8 with simalar performance characteristics!

 

In many cases the HTC One M8 has a stronger signal than the One Max, at least in my testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the network has started to actively move me off band 25 to band 26 on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apt. Sorry for being so vague. But noticed it maintained connection to band 26 for almost an hour on its own with out shifting to band 25 and when it it did move to band 25. It moved back to band 26 to increase efficient of the page load with what I can assume a less burden site.

 

Side note: I was around Fordham in the Bronx and I never knew capacity to be so poor in an area. Nothing would work when traveling through. It wouldnt lock on to band 41 at all and I am pretty sure there are sites in the area. So work must be going on I can only assume. But sites are completely overloaded. I can actually lock onto a tower in my room that cover that area towards the east of me, and its one that has continuously poor throughput when I do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

been noticing pretty lousy LTE speeds in most places depending on the time of day.  in fact, down around Union Square and SoHo it's actually slower than 3G from the other carriers.  very seldom can I get a LTE connection that holds consistent speeds higher than 2 or 3 Mbps, and this tends to be completely erratic depending on one's movement.  and for what it's worth, I've not seen any increase in 3G speeds - granted, I've not really kept up on talk from a few years about the upgrade the 3G service was supposedly undergoing but it's basically unusable in Manhattan. 

 

to the folks boasting blazing face speeds and mentioning band numbers, I'd love to know what you're doing because for my wife and I, and my best friend and his wife, all of whom work in NYC and use new LTE devices, we're just not seeing anything that could even be described as very good.

Edited by Morningside78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

been noticing pretty lousy LTE speeds in most places depending on the time of day.  in fact, down around Union Square and SoHo it's actually slower than 3G from the other carriers.  very seldom can I get a LTE connection that holds consistent speeds higher than 2 or 3 Mbps, and this tends to be completely erratic depending on one's movement.  and for what it's worth, I've not seen any increase in 3G speeds - granted, I've not really kept up on talk from a few years about the upgrade the 3G service was supposedly undergoing but it's basically unusable in Manhattan. 

 

to the folks boasting blazing face speeds and mentioning band numbers, I'd love to know what you're doing because for my wife and I, and my best friend and his wife, all of whom work in NYC and use new LTE devices, we're just not seeing anything that could even be described as very good.

That's weird because I spend most of my day in SoHo and easily pull speeds nice advertised all day. In fact I was in SoHo, around Wooster Street, to visit my friend at a dance studio. I had LTE and was pulling between 9 and 10 Mbps on average. I probably have some speedtests in my phone still too.

 

If I were to lose LTE I'd drop to usable 3G. The speeds on 3G are bearable because of how far along the LTE deployment has come.

 

Oh and I'm using an HTC One M8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...