Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

3g has gotten much better in little neck queens. I didn't know 50ms ping with 1mbps speed is so much better than 150-200ms ping.

 

Of course. The signal from your phone to the Internet and back is really fast at 50 ms.

 

I think it's pretty snappy when I used to get 400-500 Kbps with 60-100 ms ping. I can't imagine a consistent 1 Mbps with low pings but I'm betting that after NV the average will be higher than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

LTE is live in port jefferson and there are 3g upgrades popping up all over the island

 

That makes sense . Sprint is probably gonna start farther out in L.I first because it isn't as dense as where I live which is borderline Queens . 3G upgrades i'll be happy with that most definitely I don't mind 3G as long as its fast & I don't have wait long for a webpage to load ya know .

 

 

 

You know that 10Mbps is more than enough to satisfy anything you're going to do on your phone right? So long as you have low ping times, 2 or 3Mbps will accomplish even streaming video without much buffering.

 

More than likely the area where you live will not see Clearwire sites, at least not initially. They are deploying them in high-density. high-capacity areas to ease the network by allowing some phones to offload from Sprint 1900 onto 2600. And even when you do have the coverage, speeds will likely be faster than the 1900 network, but you're not likely to see speeds constantly as high as what you posted.

 

The site that has been accepted with LTE is in Port Jefferson. As far as how long before it's active, I believe someone reported a signal there already, but it has not been mapped on Sensorly yet.

 

Yeahh , I think you guys are right about the whole 10mbps thing working out for pretty much anything , cause I remember when I went to Brooklyn I had LTE it was 3mbps up & down , I was able to go on Y'T & watch a video it wasn't 1080p but it did load pretty snappy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've getting spotty (but existent) LTE in Nyack, as well as along the LIRR in Jamaica and near Tarrytown on Metro-North

 

Hopefully it heads north soon!

 

West Nyack near the Palisades mall is the first place I ever got LTE it was amazing , I check sensorly every now & then to see if the coverage over their is getting better & I see a lot more purple . Sprint FTW .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When do u guys think those WHOLE upgrade not just NV , will be complete ? I hear Late 2013 early 2014 but thats a doubt , at this point , I think everything for Sprint will be complete by 2014's end .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When do u guys think those WHOLE upgrade not just NV , will be complete ? I hear Late 2013 early 2014 but thats a doubt , at this point , I think everything for Sprint will be complete by 2014's end .

 

Sprint will be 100% complete at the end of 2014. They should have upgrades started in every market by the end of 2013. By year's end I would expect to see more dense coverage of NYC, Chicago complete, Puerto Rico and the USVI complete, and then some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Sprint will be 100% complete at the end of 2014. They should have upgrades started in every market by the end of 2013. By year's end I would expect to see more dense coverage of NYC, Chicago complete, Puerto Rico and the USVI complete, and then some.

 

#CheersToThat even tho im not of legal drinking age lol .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This morning, I had a LTE signal at work for 15 seconds in the financial district. I hope that means someone was testing the signal and hope to get some LTE here at work. been living with poor data ever since Sandy. The signal strength was -118 which means it's a bit far away but it's giving me hope. Anyone else in the area noticed it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a difference 6 blocks can make.

 

Hillside Avenue:

543430954.png

 

Union Turnpike:

543433720.png

^^^Hillside & 168th Street.

Yeah must be something going on cause I'm in the 179th street and Hillside area and 3G and 4G have gone down in speed along with signal strength the last week or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Yeah must be something going on cause I'm in the 179th street and Hillside area and 3G and 4G have gone down in speed along with signal strength the last week or so.

 

In Brooklyn too I noticed sites down. Probably a good sign though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Espn is thinking of subsidizing their app on Verizon and att as well.

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk HD

 

With that, espn wouldn't take data out of their reg data allowance. Espn would be paying for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

With that, espn wouldn't take data out of their reg data allowance. Espn would be paying for it

 

Ah I thought you meant Verizon was letting the NHL app not count toward data. That's what I thought you meant by free. Silly me!

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question. I really have horrible reception at work. My office is in literally the middle of the building (2nd floor, middle section of the floor) and the build has been renovated but seems like the foundation of the building is really old. I can get 4g anywhere inside the building but very weak 3g only in my office. Since I have Airave unit I no longer need at home (thanks sprint; 1-2 bar 1X, 0.1mbps 3g speed has gone up to 4-5 bars with freaking awesome 3g speed -80dbm and 95-100 RSRP LTE 3-10mbps download), I have a plan to bring the Airave to my office. Would that be okay with sprint since it will be connected to non home network? Not sure how the firewall at work will do to the unit but its worth a try I think.

Edited by pslee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can connect it up anywhere. It utilizes a VPN style connection to their network for security reasons so your network would need to allow for that plus have an okay ping time with jitter being the key for voice. The GPS signal from the antenna and/or antenna extension wire is required so take that into consideration with the location of the device.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can connect it up anywhere. It utilizes a VPN style connection to their network for security reasons so your network would need to allow for that plus have an okay ping time with jitter being the key for voice. The GPS signal from the antenna and/or antenna extension wire is required so take that into consideration with the location of the device.

 

yea. i noticed that getting GPS is the biggest challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...