Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

800 LTE carrier cards were not available at the time that most of the initial NV equipment installs occurred. Later this summer, new NV installs should include all the equipment needed for 1900 and 800. But the majority of NYC market installs occurred before the 800 equipment was available, which means that additional visits are necessary.

Can 800 1x come before a tech comes out? Is that just a switch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can 800 1x come before a tech comes out? Is that just a switch?

 

Nothing, except the Nextel network shutdown, is just a switch. And even that involved site visits to fully shut down the network. Everything requires testing, provisioning, routing, which generally requires a site visit. The only way is doesn't is if they've already done all the on-site testing, in which they may be able to remotely activate. But seeing as NO ONE has reported any 800 1x in the NYC market, I doubt any on the ground testing has been done, which is why the estimate of several weeks to a couple months for 800 1x activations to start rolling seems pretty reasonable. Maybe they were able to keep the testing secret, but I doubt it with the number of people who know what to look for in the market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When do you guys expect for this LTE to be launched in NYC?

Launches mean nothing to sprint customers. As soon as a site is ready to broadcast LTE its up and running. If you are curious as to where LTE is available, check out crowd sourced sensorly.com, it tends to be more accurate than any official coverage map by any carrier. Also, as side note, coverage in NYC is pretty decent already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Launches mean nothing to sprint customers. As soon as a site is ready to broadcast LTE its up and running. If you are curious as to where LTE is available, check out crowd sourced sensorly.com, it tends to be more accurate than any official coverage map by any carrier. Also, as side note, coverage in NYC is pretty decent already.

 

I have no idea what you mean by pretty decent coverage in NYC. I have no decent coverage. I have no LTE in my neighborhood and where I work. Yes sensorly makes it look like the whole city is covered but when you drill into the street level, it's not so covered and as Sprint fine tunes the panels angles, in places where Sensorly has purple, you no longer get LTE. Service is not pretty decent in NYC. Maybe Brooklyn and Bronx can claim pretty decent. Not Queens and Lower Manhattan. I'm still waiting for NV in Lower Manhattan and Sprint keeps telling me they are working on the towers and the ETR keeps getting pushed back a week after a week.

 

On a side note, T-Mobile works well as I am testing them to see if i'll make the jump. So far it's looking like T-Mobile will be my next carrier. I hope Sprint does finish the upgrades and can compete. As long as Sprint has good plans (Not the new plans), I will reconsider later.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine that the 1900 sites that were complete weren't provisioned for 800 at the same time. Time wise and expense wise, sprint (alcutel, etc) can't send out all those techs out again to each site. That would be like doing NV all over again, except not as much work. I figured they would turn each switch on, only then if they have a problem with a specific site, then they would come to diagnose the issue.

 

Every NV tower is going to need multiple trips until 800 LTE+CDMA, 1900 LTE+CDMA is all installed on the NV towers.  The hope is that each extra trip you go you can check off more of these items so that you don't need to come for additional trips.

 

Also 800 wasn't provisioned at the same time as 1900 because 1) most of the NV sites right now don't have the 800 carrier card installed at the RBS and 2) Since the Nextel network was up and running and taking up the 800 MHz spectrum Sprint couldn't just fire up 800 mhz for testing or else it would cause interference.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what you mean by pretty decent coverage in NYC. I have no decent coverage. I have no LTE in my neighborhood and where I work. Yes sensorly makes it look like the whole city is covered but when you drill into the street level, it's not so covered and as Sprint fine tunes the panels angles, in places where Sensorly has purple, you no longer get LTE. Service is not pretty decent in NYC. Maybe Brooklyn and Bronx can claim pretty decent. Not Queens and Lower Manhattan. I'm still waiting for NV in Lower Manhattan and Sprint keeps telling me they are working on the towers and the ETR keeps getting pushed back a week after a week.

 

On a side note, T-Mobile works well as I am testing them to see if i'll make the jump. So far it's looking like T-Mobile will be my next carrier. I hope Sprint does finish the upgrades and can compete. As long as Sprint has good plans (Not the new plans), I will reconsider later.

Sensorly actually shows there is almost no coverage in lower manhattan, Im in the bronx, i have very decent coverage, upper west side pretty decent, upper east side pretty decent, yonkers area pretty decent, Astoria is decent, washington heights is also pretty decent, lower east works well also. Is it perfect? no it is not! do they have plenty of work ahead..yes they do, but to say coverage is bad, is not really looking at the bigger picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly actually shows there is almost no coverage in lower manhattan, Im in the bronx, i have very decent coverage, upper west side pretty decent, upper east side pretty decent, yonkers area pretty decent, Astoria is decent, washington heights is also pretty decent, lower east works well also. Is it perfect? no it is not! do they have plenty of work ahead..yes they do, but to say coverage is bad, is not really looking at the bigger picture.

I didn't say coverage is bad. Other then Brooklyn and Bronx and upper manhattan, coverage isn't pretty decent. In queens, I don't have pretty decent coverage. LTE is limited and 3G is mediocre. And with such spots of LTE in queens, I switch from LTE to 3G too often to have reliable data coverage. I know it's expected and such but let's not say NYC has pretty decent coverage when that's not true. Only few parts of NYC has decent coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say coverage is bad. Other then Brooklyn and Bronx and upper manhattan, coverage isn't pretty decent. In queens, I don't have pretty decent coverage. LTE is limited and 3G is mediocre. And with such spots of LTE in queens, I switch from LTE to 3G too often to have reliable data coverage. I know it's expected and such but let's not say NYC has pretty decent coverage when that's not true. Only few parts of NYC has decent coverage.

Better yet, lets say its not decent in the places you visit, and is for the places that I visit..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better yet, lets say its not decent in the places you visit, and is for the places that I visit..

here are my speedtest from the same nv tower, and the problem is when you get lte you see the difference land when you go back to 3g and you cant even open a website or google now, makes me mad

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

uploadfromtaptalk1374531242037.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1374531265032.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1374531765542.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here are my speedtest from the same nv tower, and the problem is when you get lte you see the difference land when you go back to 3g and you cant even open a website or google now, makes me mad

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

It looks like you have pretty bad signal from the looks of your Notification bar...EVDO under -100dBm i find to be almost unusable..That being the case, you might benefit greatly from 800 VOICE/LTE or a closer tower being upgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My phone rarely connects to the old site and I get better service than NV sites, sprint should upgrade more than one or two in the area because is actually making it worst.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk HD

 

uploadfromtaptalk1374544827049.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1374544850281.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the completed maps, times square and lower manhattan need a lot of help for LTE deployment. The backhaul deployment needs to speed up to get LTE launched. Hopefully 800 LTE and cdma launches are starting up if the vendors have to go back to these NV completed 3g sites to launch 800 and 1900 LTE and 800 cdma. I dont think nyc will be announced by sprint until december.

 

Sent from my Motorola Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last few updates have mostly been LTE so I think that what Sprint is concentrating most on in NYC is getting fiber to all of these sites with only 3G upgrades. Personally, I think a fall launch in NYC is very doable. Although it probably won't make much of a difference whether it's launched or not. All you will be able to do is call in when your tower is down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you not get LTE anywhere? Or just where you're at?

 

Only there

 

He saud, not that it matters because Sprint usually keeps towers on after they are complete whereas AT&T and Verizon turn them off and then turn it back on for the launch. However I do know a few LTE sites that got turned off after they got completed in Brooklyn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...