Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2012-12-27_09-26-21_zps9434b84a.png

 

My wife just sent me this from her cubicle in Torrance. She works near Prairie and Del Amo. By the Del Amo Bridge. Man am I jealous!

I'm on the other side of Torrance, Near Alpine Village and I'm lucky to get 3G above 80kbps...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So weird because I was getting decent 4g signal, picking up 4mbs, at my work (Fairfax/Wilshire). The past month has been a completely different story. 3G signal has a tough time connecting. It's the strangest thing. I'll walk closer to going inside my building and signal picks up faster. I move around the corner of the building and...nothing, not even 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been following this forum for a while trying to keep up with the 4g rollout for Sprint and educating myself. I finally decided to join because I've been doing random speed tests all over L.A. when I've picked up LTE on my iPhone 5. I've gotten really strong coverage on the 101 going through Hollywood. I did a speed test around the Barham exit and got something like 20-25 down and I'll have to reference the test to see what the upload was. I've also been picking up some coverage around the Sherman Oaks area. I took this speed test about 2 weeks ago and looking at the map, I was somewhere btwn Tarzana and Woodland Hills when I got 25.26 down and 7.6 up. Apparently I hit my upload quota w/ my first upload so I'll have to provide screenshots later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been following this forum for a while trying to keep up with the 4g rollout for Sprint and educating myself. I finally decided to join because I've been doing random speed tests all over L.A. when I've picked up LTE on my iPhone 5. I've gotten really strong coverage on the 101 going through Hollywood. I did a speed test around the Barham exit and got something like 20-25 down and I'll have to reference the test to see what the upload was. I've also been picking up some coverage around the Sherman Oaks area. I took this speed test about 2 weeks ago and looking at the map, I was somewhere btwn Tarzana and Woodland Hills when I got 25.26 down and 7.6 up. Apparently I hit my upload quota w/ my first upload so I'll have to provide screenshots later.

 

Welcome aboard. Was in northridge yesterday. nothing strong enough to stay connected

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o...k. . Could you tell me where I AM allowed to post this sensitive material and ask it? :td:

 

Become a Premier Sponsor, and you can check the status yourself.

 

Now, if this is a question about Sprint LTE at your home, why should it matter? You should be offloading to your broadband connection at home.

 

Both simple as that...

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Become a Premier Sponsor, and you can check the status yourself.

 

Now, if this is a question about Sprint LTE at your home, why should it matter? You should be offloading to your broadband connection at home.

 

Both simple as that...

 

AJ

 

First, I am a Sponsor and I am not a multi-millionaire so I can't do more than that right now. I used to be able to post questions without getting them removed constantly.

Second, my broadband at home is through the only service provider in my area, Time Warner, and the speeds don't go over 4-6mbps on a good day because of the wiring in my complex. Also I take walks regularly and like to be able to use my phone on my walks.

So, no its not as 'simple as that' for everyone.

Tell me where I can post my question so it won't be removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I am a Sponsor and I am not a multi-millionaire so I can't do more than that right now.

 

The info that you seek is Premier level. That is very clear. When the site in question goes live, then it will be announced at the Sponsor level. Begging for Premier level info in the open forums will not be tolerated.

 

Second, my broadband at home is through the only service provider in my area, Time Warner, and the speeds don't go over 4-6mbps on a good day because of the wiring in my complex.

 

So, you need greater than 4 Mbps on your handset??? Just what do you plan on doing with greater than 4 Mbps? Violating Sprint's Ts and Cs?

 

Ben, you want a solution, but you sound like part of the problem.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

good news for u but i ve been getting LTE all around the west side of glendale

 

Well its weird, my office is right inbetween that site and the sears site. I can get LTE in the front half of my building but not the back half, im hoping that this site is the one that covers the other half of my office. (I dont have LTE as of today in my office but still get it in the front half of my building)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Well its weird, my office is right inbetween that site and the sears site. I can get LTE in the front half of my building but not the back half, im hoping that this site is the one that covers the other half of my office. (I dont have LTE as of today in my office but still get it in the front half of my building)

The sears site is not updated yet Its still running the legacy equipment I work in portos right there and speeds vary a lot by moments go more than 1mbps and suddenly drop less than 0.10kbps.That site in the picture is going to give much better coverage on the west part of the city.All LTE in Glendale is from the site in san fernando and chevy chase.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sears site is not updated yet Its still running the legacy equipment I work in portos right there and speeds vary a lot by moments go more than 1mbps and suddenly drop less than 0.10kbps.That site in the picture is going to give much better coverage on the west part of the city.All LTE in Glendale is from the site in san fernando and chevy chase.

 

I didnt realize that the sears site wasnt up yet. I could have sworn I saw it on the map as complete. But glad to know I am getting LTE signal in part of my building from a site thats over a mile away. The new site you took a pic of is .5 miles from my office so it should take care of my whole building!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The data speeds have been significantly slowed the past few days across LA and Ventura Co. (possibly from the wind?) It's hard to even connect to Facebook or Instagram with the 3G speeds that have been given out. Hoping for something more manageable.

Random question. I don't understand the conversations against those who don't offload from fast 4G to their slow home WiFi as soon as they get home. What if you don't have a wireless router or you can't connect to it via all your devices at once or what if your home internet is slower than the speeds that you're paying Sprint for? Can someone politely enlighten me? We pay exorbitant fees for both, so aren't we allowed to use them according to our needs for fastest productivity? :realitycheck: -Signed Someone who abides by T and Cs of Sprint (ie. doesnt torrent bits etc). :thx:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The data speeds have been significantly slowed the past few days across LA and Ventura Co. (possibly from the wind?) It's hard to even connect to Facebook or Instagram with the 3G speeds that have been given out. Hoping for something more manageable.

Random question. I don't understand the conversations against those who don't offload from fast 4G to their slow home WiFi as soon as they get home. What if you don't have a wireless router or you can't connect to it via all your devices at once or what if your home internet is slower than the speeds that you're paying Sprint for? Can someone politely enlighten me? We pay exorbitant fees for both, so aren't we allowed to use them according to our needs for fastest productivity? :realitycheck: -Signed Someone who abides by T and Cs of Sprint (ie. doesnt torrent bits etc). :thx:

 

This isn't really the thread for this... but the point of it is network resources. If you leave your phone on the network all the time, that is one more person using up the resources 24/7. If everyone does this, it will pull the network down faster. And it's only when it's feasible. If you don't have WiFi, or your home internet speeds really are too slow for what you need (if you get at least 3Mbps, there's no reason not to use WiFi) then you've got a reason to leave your phone on the network. If your home internet is 15Mbps, but you can get 25Mbps on Sprint, then most would still expect you to use your home internet, because it is more than fast enough for anything you need to do on your phone.

 

I believe this has been debated to it's end plenty elsewhere on this forum, so if you really need to continue discussing it, we should probably move this elsewhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...