Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If they execute like they have in NYC, we now have well over 300 small cells in just over 5 months times.

I think he was saying there are  2030 small cells nationwide around the corner. Not sure what the 30 is in there instead of a nice round number like 2000.  :D

 

 

How many small cells in LA does that make counting the Jonathan Kramer's tracking?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now we just need small cells in Orange County,I.E., riverside, San Diego and band 26 all across SoCal and we'll be set. Lol!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How does the earfcn of 41176 fit with the other B41 carriers in the market? What do the first 3 carriers use?

 

Sent from my Pixel XL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the earfcn of 41176 fit with the other B41 carriers in the market? What do the first 3 carriers use?

 

Sent from my Pixel XL

My phone usually indicates 39874 or 40072.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Year 2030. Attempted joke. Sorry.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

 

I knew the sarcasm in the context you meant. Knowing Sprint, that's pretty accurate

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they execute like they have in NYC, we now have well over 300 small cells in just over 5 months times.

 

Weren't NYC small cells already in place and just needed to be converted from WiMax to LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't NYC small cells already in place and just needed to be converted from WiMax to LTE?

Alot of them were from Wimax hayday's, but the last 3 months i have seen at least 30+ pop up that were not part of the initial Wimax deployment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't NYC small cells already in place and just needed to be converted from WiMax to LTE?

Initial quick conversions were existing small cells right of ways.

 

Most recent ones and going forward are organic sprint deployments.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

For the first time I noticed some small cells in West L.A. So far, the parts of the city that have multiple deployments include: Koreatown, parts of Hollywood, NoHo and now West LA. There's probably more, I just haven't come across them.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the first time I noticed some small cells in West L.A. So far, the parts of the city that have multiple deployments include: Koreatown, parts of Hollywood, NoHo and now West LA. There's probably more, I just haven't come across them.

I actually saw one way down south on Carson Street just west of Normandie last month when I was in town. LA city strip between Torrance and Carson.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

And in Alaska where it was reported that AT&T is broadcasting an LTE carrier in the PCS G Block, Sprint's PCS G Block.

Any proof of this?

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Any updates on small cell deployments?

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

It's all over and expanding every day.

 

Majority is in existing light poles.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These aren't small cells, but they're kind of rare:  Single sector GMO macro sites (non-omnidirectional).

 

3Vuxy0pm.jpg

m9x2qZBm.jpg

(That's a Verizon site across the street.)

 

b3yjyiOm.jpg

 

Pretty decent speeds too:

cVV3B0qm.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...