Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

Hi there, its the first time I comment on this thing. I live in Kerman and ever since they started the 800mhz upgrade, my area has almost turned into a dead zone. Luckily today I found out that the optimization process is at 93%. Ever since the optimization process started, my data connection has dropped and become useless. Even though the 3G sign appears, signal check says there is no data connection. Can't wait until it's completed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there, its the first time I comment on this thing. I live in Kerman and ever since they started the 800mhz upgrade, my area has almost turned into a dead zone. Luckily today I found out that the optimization process is at 93%. Ever since the optimization process started, my data connection has dropped and become useless. Even though the 3G sign appears, signal check says there is no data connection. Can't wait until it's completed!

Welcome to S4GRU! Yes, funny things have occurred in a few areas since Network Vision started. But once it's done, it'll work so much better than it did before! Hope to see you around more often.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright have to know if there is a thread on here that talks about LTE in Vegas? please help looked on Sensorly maps & it shows 4G & WiMax both sho I need to know if the 4G is LTE & that before I head there tomorrow if I will have LTE thanx this is 4G

 

http://www.sensorly.com/map/4G/US/USA/Sprint/lte_310sprint#q=Sams+Town+Bowling+Center%2C+5111+Boulder+Highway%2C+Las+Vegas%2C+NV+89122%2C+USA|coverage

 

 

& this is WiMax thanx

 

http://www.sensorly.com/map/WIMAX/US/USA/Sprint-Wimax/wimax_310sprint#q=Sams+Town+Bowling+Center%2C+5111+Boulder+Highway%2C+Las+Vegas%2C+NV+89122%2C+USA|coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend just got back from Vegas and said the LTE was either great or not there at all depending on location. Mostly there but if it isn't even the 3g is awful. 

Edited by Mikeclar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes I know 4G is LTE yet when you look on the Sprint maps LTE is not on their site on 4G WiMAX is so just need to know if there is a Thread on S4GRU that may talk about it more

There is a Vegas thread.

 

Vegas is not launched yet but is pretty much entirely covered with Band 25 and even a few spots of Band 41.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got off the phone with a rep and they told me that the upgrade in Kerman's only tower would be fully completed by the 14th around 11 in the morning. And that LTE would be "fully operational" by the next month. By "fully operational" does that mean that they will begin testing it the next month or will the testing be completed the next month? What do you guys think?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one on 180 and Brawley is no longer there , went through a couple times and got nothing. But this morning at broadway and tuolumne st I got LTE but very weak signal and it wouldn't stay long even if I moved a tad bit it was gone. Ive been trying to map so sensorly and for some reason it wont do it? Anyone else having this issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends where you are, was in Anaheim this past week and very "place" dependent. There are spots of blazing and places (like Disneyland) where you are better off leaving it on 3g only as it will keep switching to really bad lte!  California Adventure however has half the park bathed in 4G that is awesome and then spots where you are better off staying on 3G only. Very annoying but obviously in a situation like that it gets overloaded very, very easily! LOL!

My wife's has a Spark enabled phone and there were places in LA that were Umm... WOW! (she refuses to waste time running speed tests though) but you could download large files in a flash! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far in Kerman, the single tower has been fully upgraded and optimized since the 17th of july. After the upgrade my signal has been worse than what it used to be and it has become very unstable. And my data connection keep disconnecting every few minutes. Does anyone know what might be the cause? This starts happening more frequently around 8 pm and last until 11 am every day. It took several calls but they finally came to the conclusion that it was something with the tower and not my phone. Also, I'm only experiencing this in my neighborhood while the rest of the town seems to be back to normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far in Kerman, the single tower has been fully upgraded and optimized since the 17th of july. After the upgrade my signal has been worse than what it used to be and it has become very unstable. And my data connection keep disconnecting every few minutes. Does anyone know what might be the cause? This starts happening more frequently around 8 pm and last until 11 am every day. It took several calls but they finally came to the conclusion that it was something with the tower and not my phone. Also, I'm only experiencing this in my neighborhood while the rest of the town seems to be back to normal.

And how do you know it has been optimized?

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And how do you know it has been optimized?

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

The problem with the unstable signal and 3G (data) disconnecting started happening like a few days back. So I called and they said that the tower should be up and running perfectly again on the 17th. So I called reporting the same problem still on the 18th and today, and they said that the upgrades had been complete on the 14th and fully optimized by the 17th. So for two days they kept doing the basic troubleshooting without success and sending reports to the engineers. Until today when they finally made some sort of report (I cant remember for who it was) and they said that it would take about 7 days to get a response and up to a few weeks to get the problem fixed. The weird thing is that I have sort of a stable signal during the day but once it gets to around 8pm that's when things start getting unstable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends where you are, was in Anaheim this past week and very "place" dependent. There are spots of blazing and places (like Disneyland) where you are better off leaving it on 3g only as it will keep switching to really bad lte!  California Adventure however has half the park bathed in 4G that is awesome and then spots where you are better off staying on 3G only. Very annoying but obviously in a situation like that it gets overloaded very, very easily! LOL!

My wife's has a Spark enabled phone and there were places in LA that were Umm... WOW! (she refuses to waste time running speed tests though) but you could download large files in a flash! 

 

I wish the new phones made it easier to toggle 4G on and off, like the wimax phones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish the new phones made it easier to toggle 4G on and off, like the wimax phones

It sure is easy on the Nexus 5. Go to Settings > Mobile Networks > Preferred Network Type.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...