Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Rawvega said:

Not quite. Swiftel is still limping along.

OK, I thought they were gone.  They probably should be gone.  To be fair about it, I do not travel through the Swiftel area or live there, so I should not be commenting about their service, good or bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Any 20x20 from them yet?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

We have Band 41 on sites that need it.  Have some 10X10 band 25 at some places.   Some of the Shentel territory is rural, and it just does not make sense to activate everything that may be possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, chamb said:

OK, I thought they were gone.  They probably should be gone.  To be fair about it, I do not travel through the Swiftel area or live there, so I should not be commenting about their service, good or bad.

IIRC the general consensus from people who live in the area or have travelled through their territory is that they're quite horrible. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have Band 41 on sites that need it.  Have some 10X10 band 25 at some places.   Some of the Shentel territory is rural, and it just does not make sense to activate everything that may be possible. 
Why not? That would make Sprint a big contender in that area.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Why not? That would make Sprint a big contender in that area.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Sure it would be nice to have Band 41 in every corner, but if you saw how rural some of these areas are, you would not spend the money to activate band 41 either.  When you have more cows and cornstalks than people, you need cell service but you do not need 3xCA band 41. if you have two band 25 channels running at 20 down each, would you spend thousands to add band 41?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure it would be nice to have Band 41 in every corner, but if you saw how rural some of these areas are, you would not spend the money to activate band 41 either.  When you have more cows and cornstalks than people, you need cell service but you do not need 3xCA band 41. if you have two band 25 channels running at 20 down each, would you spend thousands to add band 41?
I was actually talking about B25 since 20x20 is possible in that area. If I'm thinking of the right area. Wasn't talking about B41. For that B41 would be if the 20x20 plus 10x10 along with B26 slows down

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Would it ever make sense for Sprint to acquire Shentel or does the current affiliate agreement make more sense?

Makes sense. Shentel is paying for the network deployment for those specific areas. Less work for Sprint. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tengen31 said:

I was actually talking about B25 since 20x20 is possible in that area. If I'm thinking of the right area. Wasn't talking about B41. For that B41 would be if the 20x20 plus 10x10 along with B26 slows down

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

20X20 on band 25 could be possible in some of the rural areas but I have not seen it anywhere.  Some of the more populated areas that I frequent do not have it either, probably because CDMA voice is still needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20X20 on band 25 could be possible in some of the rural areas but I have not seen it anywhere.  Some of the more populated areas that I frequent do not have it either, probably because CDMA voice is still needed.
From what I've heard 20x20 is possible with Spectrum still left for CDMA

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Sprint has the Hulu arrangement, and perhaps we’ll see a discounted “Live TV” plan for Sprint customers soon.

However, did Sprint miss out on an opportunity here?

http://www.multichannel.com/news/content/t-mobile-paid-325-million-layer3-tv/418030

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Sprint has the Hulu arrangement, and perhaps we’ll see a discounted “Live TV” plan for Sprint customers soon.
However, did Sprint miss out on an opportunity here?
http://www.multichannel.com/news/content/t-mobile-paid-325-million-layer3-tv/418030
Sprint will be better off keeping that 325 million tord the network.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, chamb said:

20X20 on band 25 could be possible in some of the rural areas but I have not seen it anywhere.  Some of the more populated areas that I frequent do not have it either, probably because CDMA voice is still needed.

Alcatel-Lucent PCS CDMA / LTE equipment do not support 15x15 or 20x20.  Up to 10x10 per carrier. 10+5 CA possible. Don't think 10+10 and up is not. 

Need to double up on radio / antennas to use that equipment as its configured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcatel-Lucent PCS CDMA / LTE equipment do not support 15x15 or 20x20.  Up to 10x10 per carrier. 10+5 CA possible. Don't think 10+10 and up is not. 

Need to double up on radio / antennas to use that equipment as its configured. 
What does it take to do 15x15 of higher? What's the Orlando market for equipment I can't remember?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Sprint will be better off keeping that 325 million tord the network.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Normally I’d agree with you, but $325 Million for an established IP TV platform is a deal.

Sprint currently has its own Sprint TV service, which never seems to get mentioned at all.

The Sprint Website contains these old pages:

https://shop2.sprint.com/en/services/power_vision/sprint_tv.shtml

https://www.sprint.com/landings/tvguide/

The Sprint TV App for iOS currently has a 1.2 Star Rating and it hasn’t been updated in a year.

The Android App was last updated in October 2017, and has a better rating: 2.8 Stars.

I think Sprint would have been better off putting the money that it put into TIDAL into this instead. TIDAL seems like a dead end to me, and I’m not sure Sprint will ever make its money back on its investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RedSpark said:

I know Sprint has the Hulu arrangement, and perhaps we’ll see a discounted “Live TV” plan for Sprint customers soon.

However, did Sprint miss out on an opportunity here?

http://www.multichannel.com/news/content/t-mobile-paid-325-million-layer3-tv/418030

Do you realize how much more money you be shelling out to run a cable operation with channel contracts and the like, asking  to be paid more with each contract renewal. That's a chore all on its own and Legere will find out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tengen31 said:

What does it take to do 15x15 of higher? What's the Orlando market for equipment I can't remember?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Orlando has Ericsson B25 equipment. Samsung B25 equipment has recently been certified for 15x15 too. ALU B25 equipment has not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kg4icg said:

Do you realize how much more money you be shelling out to run a cable operation with channel contracts and the like, asking  to be paid more with each contract renewal. That's a chore all on its own and Legere will find out. 

Isn’t Sprint already paying carriage fees with its TV App?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

64a5c31ec2a8ff4754627a888da22341.jpg

Minus the upload speeds, do these numbers really show a difference in real world usage? I don’t think so. It is good to see Sprint have a average above 20mbps now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

Isn’t Sprint already paying carriage fees with its TV App?

Actually, the consumer is paying for it when they have a certain package or channels initiated. Owning a cable company is another matter all in its own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, derrph said:


Minus the upload speeds, do these numbers really show a difference in real world usage? I don’t think so. It is good to see Sprint have a average above 20mbps now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wonder if Nationwide 4x4 mimo 256qam will help? Sprint needs that more than anyone. Same for 64qam on up

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...