Jump to content

Sprint Home Wifi Router [Wi-Fi Connect][Asus AC66u]


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Is there a tool on the PC that allows you to do this?

Yes, there are many tools out there on PC's that have the ability to scan wifi networks and display relevant information. I used one many years ago trying to find a lost computer. I will try to find the name of it and post it here today. If you are on a Mac however, the app is built into OS X, and is nice and informative.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint sent me both a new Airave (2.5) and the WiFi Connect router. The Airave is still blinking red on mobile, and my wife's iPhone 5s won't connect to the network for WiFi calling either. I called Airave support this morning and the guy had me reboot things for an hour with no success.

 

Anyone else have tips on getting WiFi calling working on an iPhone and/or proper configuration of Airave with the WiFi connect?

AJ would you still object to discussions about hacking the firmware on the router if the objective is to set high priority in QoS for the Airave?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My curiosity with the firmware was more along the lines of why did sprint disable those specific features in their firmware in the first place? Could they negatively be affecting any of the Wi-Fi calling aspects, or was it just a choice of the head for the project saying, meh they don't need those?

 

Also does anyone know if you can do a dump of the firmware? I'd like to be able to try and dig into it to see why they made their choices on features.

 

Edit: had another thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thinking is that the QoS settings specific to Sprint's WiFi-calling are really a rather minor part of this offer. It's more that for people with, say, a single-band netgear router from several years ago, this should be a pretty substantial upgrade for their home network. Or for people such as myself who have one nice router, but can use this to set up a second access point for better in-home WiFi coverage, it's also quite a nice upgrade.

 

It is mostly having a better home WiFi network which will enable a better WiFi-calling experience. The QoS settings are probably nice to have but not essential--with a reasonably fast broadband connection and an up-to-date router you should have a good experience using WiFi calling even without custom QoS. The success of this program is in creating goodwill which should improve customer retention, and Sprint definitely achieves that with the group here.

 

My curiosity with the firmware was more along the lines of why did sprint disable those specific features in their firmware in the first place? Could they negatively be affecting any of the Wi-Fi calling aspects, or was it just a choice of the head for the project saying, meh they don't need those?

Also does anyone know if you can do a dump of the firmware? I'd like to be able to try and dig into it to see why they made their choices on features.

Edit: had another thought

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are no geographic restrictions on this, like the Airave right?

 

I can order it and use it at a secondary address not on my account?

Yup, in fact I told the guy I planned to use this at my parent's house where I go often and there's no Sprint service. It's a router.. they don't really know where you use it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My curiosity with the firmware was more along the lines of why did sprint disable those specific features in their firmware in the first place? Could they negatively be affecting any of the Wi-Fi calling aspects, or was it just a choice of the head for the project saying, meh they don't need those?

 

Also does anyone know if you can do a dump of the firmware? I'd like to be able to try and dig into it to see why they made their choices on features.

 

Edit: had another thought

Probably because making it into a repeater would defeat the whole purpose of having the router control the QoS.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a nice upgrade. I had a really old linksys router that was showing its age. Been tempted to buy a new AC router for a long time but didn't see it as enough of an upgrade to justify it. The free offer from Sprint was great. I'm a happy customer. I see no reason to mess with the fw, it's working just fine.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is mostly having a better home WiFi network which will enable a better WiFi-calling home data service experience. The QoS settings are probably nice to have but not essential--with a reasonably fast broadband connection and an up-to-date router you should have a good experience using WiFi and not sprints network at home calling even without custom QoS. The success of this program is in creating goodwill which should improve customer retention, and Sprint definitely achieves that with the group here while also moving subscribers from the macro network to their home wireless network fed by their home ISP.

 

mhm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ordered one for mom.

Has anyone used this particular router with dsl?

Her current modem+router combo is absolutely atrocious.

I have 10mbps down / 1mbps up dsl. I had a 30 minute conversation over wifi a few nights ago. I had two small hiccups during the call where it cut out for about a second each time but other than that, it seems OK. I also noticed a slight bit more delay than over the macro network but nothing terrible.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got mine in last night. First impression out of the UPS box was that the packaging was pretty high quality, and the router itself looks stellar. Tastefully done branding with the small sprint logo on one side, was expecting it to be over the top.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still having dropped wifi calls with the router :-(

 

I have FiOS 50/50 speed tier, which is definitely sufficient enough for voip calls.

I think it's probably bugs with the new feature, not necessarily your network...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone successfully running an Airave downstream of this thing? I have given up and put the Airave between the modem and router, it works after I assigned it a static IP and unblocked the upload speeds but I am not crazy about having a 100Mbps port in the middle of my network

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone successfully running an Airave downstream of this thing? I have given up and put the Airave between the modem and router, it works after I assigned it a static IP and unblocked the upload speeds but I am not crazy about having a 100Mbps port in the middle of my network

I've always had it after the router. Never had any issues. Only thing is to put the Ethernet cable in the WAN port not LAN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always had it after the router. Never had any issues. Only thing is to put the Ethernet cable in the WAN port not LAN.

So are you confirming you got this Sprint WiFi connect router and it's still working in that configuration? Or with a different router
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are you confirming you got this Sprint WiFi connect router and it's still working in that configuration? Or with a different router

Both!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
    • I found a multi-carrier oDAS node at the corner of Bushwick Ave & Cedar St. You can see an upgraded Verizon macro deployment behind the node, and T-Mobile has a fully upgraded site only a block away. So, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an AT&T node with LTE+mmWave (or maybe C-Band).
    • I tried going into a Boost Mobile store and they wouldn't sell me a rainbow SIM card, said that it would be dead as soon as I put it in the Moto Edge 2023... which I know is bs... 
    • They didn't do all 2.5 with the Sprint merger, so I'm not sure why they would do that for USCC in areas arguably more rural. But I'm 100% sure they'll swap out the gear. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...