Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

If I had to choose between more 8T8R to replace Clear B41 gear or 8T8R on towers that are not currently upgraded/WiMax only, I would take the latter, no question.  Here in the DC market, there are way too many sites, some in busy areas, that are B25/B26 only.  Or areas which are outright holes that replacing existing WiMax-only equipment would fix. 

 

I don't doubt the 8T8R would help matters in tough spots where Clear gear is today, but it seems like a much more marginal benefit to me than filling coverage gaps or upgrading towers with no B41 gear on them.

 

- Trip

 

Are most of them co-located?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is my main gripe against sprint. Why are there still sites that havent been touched or are 3g only NV in the middle of major cities and suburbs? There is no excuse for it at this point that should mean a Damn to a paying customer.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Maybe they can't be upgraded at all and need to be moved. Maybe they can't get access to the building anymore.

 

There was a site here in NYC that was located on the roof of a hospital that went bankrupt. Due to bankruptcy court and change in ownership, Sprint was basically stuck not able to get access to the roof to work on the equipment. The site would go down for weeks on end and nothing could be done.

 

https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140122/forest-hills/former-parkway-hospital-becomes-eyesore-amid-uncertain-future (hospital article) 

 

You can see the legacy Sprint 3G equipment on the roof: https://static.panoramio.com.storage.googleapis.com/photos/original/58945890.jpg

They finally got approval to move the site to a neighboring building and built out a new site completely NV ready.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are most of them co-located?

 

Most of what?  Many of the Clear sites here are co-located with Sprint, though certainly not all.  There are some WiMax-only Clear sites on the same structure as B25/B26 only Sprint and some that are not co-located at all.  And some Sprint-only sites without B41.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of what?  Many of the Clear sites here are co-located with Sprint, though certainly not all.  There are some WiMax-only Clear sites on the same structure as B25/B26 only Sprint and some that are not co-located at all.  And some Sprint-only sites without B41.

 

- Trip

 

That's what I mean by co-located. So you have ALU NV sites with legacy Clearwire WiMAX still there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they can't be upgraded at all and need to be moved. Maybe they can't get access to the building anymore.

 

There are actually a few that seem to be that way here.  There are two on power lines that don't seem to have been touched and are 3G only.  One would actually probably be my home site if it were running LTE--it seems to be for T-Mobile, at least.  But T-Mobile is running both AWS and 700 LTE from it--I actually drove by the day they were putting up the 700 panels--and all three of the other carriers have multiple LTE bands on their power line poles in the same area, but not Sprint. 

 

Another is on the roof of a hotel where AT&T and T-Mobile both have LTE service.  Sprint, apparently, plans to move to a hotel next door, but I've seen nothing to indicate it's happening any time soon.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I mean by co-located. So you have ALU NV sites with legacy Clearwire WiMAX still there?

 

Seems that way.  A bunch of them were dual mode, it seems, and quite a few (not all) are running second carrier. 

 

My home site is B25/B26 plus Clear B41 with second carrier.  The next site over has B25/B26 and Clear B41 without second carrier.  A site down the road toward Wegmans has Clear equipment on it without Sprint, presumably turned off now that WiMax is gone, but T-Mobile has AWS and 700 on that one.  And the site at Wegmans is B25/B26 with Clear not running B41.  No 8T8R either.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they can't be upgraded at all and need to be moved. Maybe they can't get access to the building anymore.

 

There was a site here in NYC that was located on the roof of a hospital that went bankrupt. Due to bankruptcy court and change in ownership, Sprint was basically stuck not able to get access to the roof to work on the equipment. The site would go down for weeks on end and nothing could be done.

 

https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140122/forest-hills/former-parkway-hospital-becomes-eyesore-amid-uncertain-future (hospital article)

 

You can see the legacy Sprint 3G equipment on the roof: https://static.panoramio.com.storage.googleapis.com/photos/original/58945890.jpg

They finally got approval to move the site to a neighboring building and built out a new site completely NV ready.

Other carriers have to deal with the same problems and manage to overcome them. It is just amazing that sprint hasn't. In the end all of those problems are meaningless for the end user that is stuck having one of those sites in their top five usage.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but in urban markets that signal propagation and performance could be rendered moot by the density in place. 

 

I'm sure eventually it would get upgraded but there is zero reason to invest millions upon millions today to rip out perfectly good Samsung 2xCA equipment. 

 

That makes sense. If it resulted in cost savings as a result of ending unnecessary leases was one thing I was considering, but what you're saying makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other carriers have to deal with the same problems and manage to overcome them. It is just amazing that sprint hasn't. In the end all of those problems are meaningless for the end user that is stuck having one of those sites in their top five usage.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Other companies already had backhaul in place as directed by forward thinking management.

Other companies had better permitting departments having more capable executives/management.

Other companies had (and have) adequate funding to do what needs doing.

 

Sprint Zone is our recourse for reporting issues, but I hope Sprint still keeps that Top Ten **** List for its worst performing sites: http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-how-to-fix-sprint/

 

Shortly after arriving, Claure began daily meetings about Sprint’s worst-performing cell sites—what the network team called the Top 10 S--- List. With about 20 executives around a table or dialing in, Claure brought up each site responsible for large numbers of dropped calls and asked how it would be fixed within 24 hours.

 

If a site was still on the list the next day, Claure would ask again: Should an antenna be tilted up or down or sideways, so it points toward more customers? Does Sprint need to add antennas, or use antennas with more bandwidth? “It was painful,” says John Saw, Sprint’s chief technology officer. “But it was good for getting the network fixed.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some more info on Sprint's 5G Test from WirelessWeek:

 

Sprint and Nokia on Friday conducted a 5G demonstration at Levis Stadium in Santa Clara, Calif. during a Centennial Copa America soccer event, delivering live 4k video streaming and virtual reality experiences at speeds of up to 2.3 gbps.

 

According to Nokia, the tests were performed using a live millimeter wave system running at 73 GHz. Sprint said the demonstration utilized beam switching, which is a method that allows a system to track a device and select the best antenna to send signals to its targeted location. Sprint said the test also included support for “dynamic TDD – the ability to adjust in real-time the allocated capacity for downlink and uplink traffic based on network demand.”

 

In addition to providing speeds of up to 2.3 gbps, Nokia said the 5G system also supported spectral bandwidth of 1 GHz and one way air interface latency of about one millisecond.

 

 

 

 

The carrier is also planning 5G tests in collaboration with Ericsson at Lincoln Financial Stadium in Philadelphia, Pa., on June 9, 11 and 14.

 

Sprint’s tests with Ericsson will utilize just one experimental 5G base station and one piece of experimental 5G mobile device running on spectrum in the 14.5 GHz to 15.35 GHz range. The base station and mobile unit will be kept within 50 feet of each other during the testing, Ericsson said.

 

 

Great stuff Sprint! Sprint essentially leapfrogged everyone on 5G.

 

It would amazing if SoftBank was secretly bidding on the 600 MHz Spectrum in the Auction...

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4K Video demo seems more like a home broadband play, right?

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

Sounds like it. Also, "Internet of Things" stuff: http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2016/06/03/sprint-5g-testing-at-copa-america-tournament.html

 

Jason Elliott, 5G market development manager for Nokia, said virtual reality, on top of the Internet of Things, will be a big part of 5G capabilities.

"It's about how you deliver experiences to people who can't physically be there," Elliott said in an interview.

 

However, it doesn't square with what Sprint has said:

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20160526/carriers/sprint-small-cell-plans-rely-delicate-financial-balance-tag2

 

On the other end of the financial scale, Robbiati said the carrier is not focused on growing “very low” average revenue per user segments like machine-to-machine or, as it’s more commonly referred to today, the “Internet of Things” market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a couple hundred Clear sites in Charlotte. A bit more than a hundred of those are collocated or redundant with Sprint sites. The remaining (a bit under a hundred) are non-redundant and would fill 3G gaps. Out of those (a bit under a hundred) non-redundant sites, only a couple dozen are dual-mode. The rest are WiMax only and are now sitting dormant. I haven't seen a conversion yet. And we need them dearly.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh has a ton of Wimax only sites that aren't colocated. Clearwire used Motorola equipment in Pittsburgh, which can't run B41. So the only B41 is 8T8R. There are many Clearwire sites in the perfect position to fill in Sprint coverage gaps, but they haven't been replaced yet.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope the 10 billion dollars is for NGN densification than the 600 MHz auction.

Agree.. use the funds to serve both purposes.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one here who thinks CYBIH has run its course? Sprint has to be able to sell on merit and network performance.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one here who thinks CYBIH has run its course? Sprint has to be able to sell on merit and network performance.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Yes and no :) I totally agree that sprint should be selling on the strength of its network, but if they have significant capacity spare there's something to be said for undercutting the competition to get some momentum. It's basically what TMO did, the whole hay cheap unlimited plus shiny crap. They had a spectrum per sub advantage and they used it to give people 10 to 20gb a month for less money than 2gb from the big two. If you can sell cheap and sell on merit and gradually increase your cost over time that's a decent stance to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get this? Last I had seen estimates were for late summer... this year.

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

From Page 5 of the recent Earnings Call Transcript: http://s21.q4cdn.com/487940486/files/doc_financials/quarterly/2015/Q4/S-US-20160503-1832656-C.pdf

 

 

"Sprint is delivering the fastest download speeds in many markets across the nation, including Chicago, Houston, Las Vegas among others. In addition, we are already rolling out devices in the market that support three -channel carrier aggregation, including the new Samsung Galaxy S7, and Sprint has demonstrated speeds of over 300 megabits per second in recent lab testing on the device. While we're already [ph] sitting (11:35) the base with capable devices, we expect to roll out three-carrier aggregation in the network in early 2017."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To those who understand about finance and accounting, what do you think about this strategy:  softbank repurchases all of sprint's debts, right now they are trading about 80 to 85 cents on a dollar.  So if softbank offers to buy them at 90 cents on a dollar many bondholders will jump on that deal since they can easily make 5 to 10% on their investment.  The advantage for Sprint is 2 fold: they trim their net debt on books by about 2 billions and reduce interest expense by 200 to 300 millions yearly ( softbank can lend them at 6% rather than 7 to 11% they are paying right now).  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To those who understand about finance and accounting, what do you think about this strategy:  softbank repurchases all of sprint's debts, right now they are trading about 80 to 85 cents on a dollar.  So if softbank offers to buy them at 90 cents on a dollar many bondholders will jump on that deal since they can easily make 5 to 10% on their investment.  The advantage for Sprint is 2 fold: they trim their net debt on books by about 2 billions and reduce interest expense by 200 to 300 millions yearly ( softbank can lend them at 6% rather than 7 to 11% they are paying right now).

 

 

Few reasons it won't work. Most importantly, it would jeopardize SoftBank's credit rating, which would put them in default on some of their own bonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...