Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

This all goes back to the Robatti interview I posted a few pages back. Time on B41 is a critical metric. Right now, that is where Sprint has 80% of their spectrum. It goes without saying that B41 time has to be up beyond where it is now. All Nielsen is proving is that B41 performance is good. That in and of itself shouldn't be shocking. Now how does Sprint increase that metric? By my own calculations, Sprint has to get people on B41 80% of the time.

 

Also it is to be Nielsen stats released are for B41. Rootmetrics and Ookla measure across all technologies.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

I was under the impression that the Nielsen ratings are for LTE Plus cities as opposed to just the one band itself. If Nielsen's rating is that comprehensive to the point where they can get statistics on the usage of one band, that'd be insane.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This all goes back to the Robatti interview I posted a few pages back. Time on B41 is a critical metric. Right now, that is where Sprint has 80% of their spectrum. It goes without saying that B41 time has to be up beyond where it is now. All Nielsen is proving is that B41 performance is good. That in and of itself shouldn't be shocking. Now how does Sprint increase that metric? By my own calculations, Sprint has to get people on B41 80% of the time.

 

Also it is to be Nielsen stats released are for B41. Rootmetrics and Ookla measure across all technologies.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

Hopefully the densification increases the time devices spend on Band 41 and 2xCA (and 3xCA eventually).

 

However, Sprint also has to push out more Triband Devices and CA-Capable Devices to users.

 

The numbers for these were on Page 5 of the recent Quarterly Investor Update for Q4 2015:

 

Tri-band LTE phones represented 69 percent of the 25.3 million ending postpaid phone connection base compared to 37 percent at the end of the year-ago quarter and 64 percent at the end of the prior quarter. During the quarter, 90 percent of postpaid phones sold were tri-band.

 

Carrier aggregation capable phones, which allow for higher data speeds, were 74 percent of postpaid phones sold during the quarter, increasing the number of these phones within the phone base to 28 percent.

 

It's not just the network. It's the devices too. (Some of which Sprint can't control... looking at you Apple for the "non-CA capable" iPhone SE)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that the Nielsen ratings are for LTE Plus cities as opposed to just the one band itself. If Nielsen's rating is that comprehensive to the point where they can get statistics on the usage of one band, that'd be insane.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

Sprint has this info I'm sure. Super proprietary no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has this info I'm sure. Super proprietary no doubt.

Robatti put out there that half the traffic is on B41, so yes. They do have that info.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bull Manure! I call bull Manure.

 

Yes, Sprint can deliver those 100+ Mbps speeds but only if you are relatively close to a Sprint or Clear tower. B26 is slower than 3G at the moment and the network is not properly balancing users between bands. I can't even stream a 32 kbps stream on B26 in some areas. Sprint is not tied for #1. No way in hell. Call and texts? Maybe. But not data speeds.

 

I streamed some 720p TV shows on B26 today while sitting next to a hospital waiting for someone to come out. So B26 does work very well in many areas, just not yours aparently.

 

To clarify. It was 5 hours of TV shows.... *dodges incoming hate for overusing data*

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bull Manure! I call bull Manure.

 

Yes, Sprint can deliver those 100+ Mbps speeds but only if you are relatively close to a Sprint or Clear tower. B26 is slower than 3G at the moment and the network is not properly balancing users between bands. I can't even stream a 32 kbps stream on B26 in some areas. Sprint is not tied for #1. No way in hell. Call and texts? Maybe. But not data speeds.

I too call BS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The graph associated with that news article shows how much progress sprint has made in two years:

 

125_Nielsen_Press_Release_Graph_6_2_16_h

 

Sprint was definitely in a rough patch in 2014.

This is a clear improvement, but I am beginning to get a little confused because all the new charts sprint is creating, like the one above, don't have labels and/or markings on the axes. They really need to label.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B26 speeds aren't the greatest but more than adequate for streaming music or videos, problem is B26 isn't optimized for crap at least in my area so it's hit or miss if I get 3G or LTE even though I should get LTE everywhere considering the tower density here.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B26 speeds aren't the greatest but more than adequate for streaming music or videos, problem is B26 isn't optimized for crap at least in my area so it's hit or miss if I get 3G or LTE even though I should get LTE everywhere considering the tower density here.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

That depends heavily on the area. In a lot of the SF Bay area B26 is often under 1 mbps. It's completely unusable during peak hours. My home site would be 0.2 mbps every day until late night, but it also (along with the adjacent sites) didn't have B41. That being said, anywhere in Oakland or SF, if you drop off B41, you can absolutely forget about a Hangouts / Google Voice VoIP call, you won't be able to hear a thing.

 

In other places where site spacing allows a majority of people to be on B41, then B26 is probably adequate for browsing or music streaming. But I've never had a "good" B26 experience.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That depends heavily on the area. In a lot of the SF Bay area B26 is often under 1 mbps. It's completely unusable during peak hours. My home site would be 0.2 mbps every day until late night, but it also (along with the adjacent sites) didn't have B41. That being said, anywhere in Oakland or SF, if you drop off B41, you can absolutely forget about a Hangout Google Voice VoIP call, you won't be able to hear a thing.

 

In other places where site spacing allows a majority of people to be on B41, then B26 is probably adequate for browsing or music streaming. But I've never had a "good" B26 experience.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

My B26 right now, not great but more than usable.

819785934052d29bed87b35edf94454a.jpg

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Edited by BlueAngel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robatti put out there that half the traffic is on B41, so yes. They do have that info.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Do you have a link to where he said that? Interested to read more about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you off load to B41 80% of the time and B25 15 % of the time, the 5% of the time you are on B26 can be decent.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a link to where he said that? Interested to read more about that.

It's back in the thread. Robatti's comments to JPMorgan.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you off load to B41 80% of the time and B25 15 % of the time, the 5% of the time you are on B26 can be decent.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Unfortunately a lot of places still only have a single 5x5 B25 carrier. If they can get a 10x10 in addition to a 5x5 in most areas, then that load balancing would work (3:1 B25:B26)

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I streamed some 720p TV shows on B26 today while sitting next to a hospital waiting for someone to come out. So B26 does work very well in many areas, just not yours aparently.

 

To clarify. It was 5 hours of TV shows.... *dodges incoming hate for overusing data*

Which hospital? Is it in the Medic Center?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately a lot of places still only have a single 5x5 B25 carrier. If they can get a 10x10 in addition to a 5x5 in most areas, then that load balancing would work (3:1 B25:B26)

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Unfortunately, I don't think Sprint can do a B25 10x10 in SF or Houston unless they trade spectrum to pair their 5x5 blocks and thin out EVDO & 1x. There's information about this on the sponsors page, so it's definitely an option for Sprint. I just doubt they do it in SF and Houston.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious question:

 

How many of the Sprint/Clear sites have new panels and updated backhaul (fiber/microwave)? They have somewhere around 40,000 macro sites, doubtful that half are up to par.

 

In NYC they haven't switched out panels yet but they began upgrading backhaul long before the launch of 2xCA here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, I don't think Sprint can do a B25 10x10 in SF or Houston unless they trade spectrum to pair their 5x5 blocks and thin out EVDO & 1x. There's information about this on the sponsors page, so it's definitely an option for Sprint. I just doubt they do it in SF and Houston.

Yeah SF is spectrum crunched for Sprint. They only have 20mhz because they sold some to ATT back in the day. I heard they were planning to thin the CDMA carriers to make room for another 5x5, but last I checked the CDMA carriers were still spread out all over their block assignment.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clear had 40,000 towers?

I thought sprint decommissioned alot of those and theirs a long time ago where they could? How many towers does sprint actually have?

I thought the total number was around 50 including Nextel/sprint/clear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In NYC they haven't switched out panels yet but they began upgrading backhaul long before the launch of 2xCA here.

 

Sprint has to get those panels switched out as soon as possible if it wants to see its RootMetrics performance improve in NYC (and in other cities).

 

The old Clearwire gear doesn't support 3xCA either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has to get those panels switched out as soon as possible if it wants to see its RootMetrics performance improve in NYC (and in other cities).

 

The old Clearwire gear doesn't support 3xCA either.

I don't think that is the issue. I still hit pretty great speeds on Clear equipment. I think its more of an issue outside of NYC (NYC could use some small cells) where there is little B41.

 

Mostly Southern parts of NJ and the outer edges of the boroughs which are lumped together with NYC in Roots testing.

 

If i had to guess, Sprint would probably be in the mid to high teens if NJ was not included in testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that is the issue. I still hit pretty great speeds on Clear equipment. I think its more of an issue outside of NYC (NYC could use some small cells) where there is little B41.

 

Mostly Southern parts of NJ and the outer edges of the boroughs which are lumped together with NYC in Roots testing.

 

If i had to guess, Sprint would probably be in the mid to high teens if NJ was not included in testing.

 

8T8R antennas have much better performance through Advanced Beamforming. John Saw blogged about this:

 

Carrier aggregation allows us to bond multiple spectrum channels together to build a fatter pipe with double the capacity and speed.  Beamforming is a signal processing technique that directs signals from multiple antennas towards where our customers are.  Our 2.5GHz LTE system with 8 Transmit 8 Receive (8T8R) radios is the sweet spot for enabling smart antenna beamforming.

 

 

Chart1.jpg

 

To make a real difference, Sprint has to get 2.5 GHz on the rest of its footprint (remaining 30%: Source: Quarterly Investor Update (Page 6)), get 8T8R on as many towers as possible ASAP, get users upgraded to at the very least Triband devices, and even better 2xCA or 3xCA devices ASAP:

 

Tri-band LTE phones represented 69 percent of the 25.3 million ending postpaid phone connection base compared to 37 percent at the end of the year-ago quarter and 64 percent at the end of the prior quarter. During the quarter, 90 percent of postpaid phones sold were tri-band.

 

Carrier aggregation capable phones, which allow for higher data speeds, were 74 percent of postpaid phones sold during the quarter, increasing the number of these phones within the phone base to 28 percent.

 

Source: Quarterly Investor Update (Page 5)

 

Honestly, if Softbank dropped the proceeds of the Alibaba sale at Sprint's feet now (Now $10 Billion), that would really help Sprint out on all of the above.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8T8R antennas have much better performance through Advanced Beamforming. John Saw blogged about this:

 

I do agree that replacing them eventually will need to be done, but in all honesty, they are working pretty well here in NYC. I still hit over 100mbs on Clear sites with pretty decent coverage. 

 

I think before Sprint starts decommissioning Clear equipment, they should concentrate on adding B41 equipment to places that lack them (like south jersey). NYC is in no dire need of these replacements.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...