Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

At the end of the day, how much better than B26 is 600mhz gonna be.

Maybe CA 800Mhz+600Mhz..

I wonder the same thing honestly. Buy 10x10 swath of 600mhz... Sell off band 26 spectrum to rural partners at a good rate...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder the same thing honestly. Buy 10x10 swath of 600mhz... Sell off band 26 spectrum to rural partners at a good rate...?

I think it would asinine to sell off 800Mhz after all that Sprint had to overcome to get it deployed. On top of the fact that device support is quite prevalent. 

 

Lets not forget, Sprint has more than 10Mhz of 800Mhz in most markets, eventually the CDMA portion will  get refarmed, probably around the time that 600Mhz could get deployed (2020-2021)

 

Making 600Mhz even less important.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would asinine to sell off 800Mhz after all that Sprint had to overcome to get it deployed. On top of the fact that device support is quite prevalent. 

 

Lets not forget, Sprint has more than 10Mhz of 800Mhz in most markets, eventually the CDMA portion will  get refarmed, probably around the time that 600Mhz could get deployed (2020-2021)

 

Making 600Mhz even less important.

Wise points. Keep both 600 and 800 then! :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would asinine to sell off 800Mhz after all that Sprint had to overcome to get it deployed. On top of the fact that device support is quite prevalent.

 

Lets not forget, Sprint has more than 10Mhz of 800Mhz in most markets, eventually the CDMA portion will get refarmed, probably around the time that 600Mhz could get deployed (2020-2021)

 

Making 600Mhz even less important.

I'm no wiz kid around here. But I think keeping everything they have and investing as little as possible on the auction. Then go all in on the next phase of NV.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would asinine to sell off 800Mhz after all that Sprint had to overcome to get it deployed. On top of the fact that device support is quite prevalent. 

 

Lets not forget, Sprint has more than 10Mhz of 800Mhz in most markets, eventually the CDMA portion will  get refarmed, probably around the time that 600Mhz could get deployed (2020-2021)

 

Making 600Mhz even less important.

The cdma carrier in 800mhz won't free up much of anything for refarming to LTE when it gets shut down. They only have 14mhz.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buy nationwide 10x10 600 and then leave ur band 26 on low power and it will just help with congestion on band 25. Then you will have amazing high and mid band speeds and very good low band speed as a back up. I assume once sprint densifies that low band won't be as important and will only be used for backup when ur inside a building that mid or high doesnt reach. Therefore you dont need huge amounts of capacity on low band

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill be honest, its going to be a 10x10 (5x5 in all likelyhood) sliver at best, plus extremely overpriced. Not to mention the fact that it would take at least 4 years before you can really deploy it properly.

 

I just don't see it as a viable option for Sprint. If they have found a easy way to leverage wireless backhaul plus C-RAN, I can see them densifying in lower population areas faster and more cost effective, plus leveraging 2.5 and hordes of spectrum that can scale.

I agree this will be a huge bidding war, sprint is better off sinking every cent they can into densification, both small cells and macro. I hope they do a good job with placement of these new sites, does anyone know what bands the new small cells will support, and will then have CA?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint should offer the Wimax customers a free Sprint line of service for a year like they're doing for their DirectTV ad. I have a friend that's using Wimax for his home ISP and Sprint sent him a message basically telling him to find another ISP. No offers or anything. It's left a sour taste in his mouth of Sprint. If they offered him a full year of free Sprint service, he'd probably take them up on it.

 

It's a few hundred thousand people. Sprint could use those numbers.

 

Sent from my M8

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint should offer the Wimax customers a free Sprint line of service for a year like they're doing for their DirectTV ad. I have a friend that's using Wimax for his home ISP and Sprint sent him a message basically telling him to find another ISP. No offers or anything. It's left a sour taste in his mouth of Sprint. If they offered him a full year of free Sprint service, he'd probably take them up on it.

 

It's a few hundred thousand people. Sprint could use those numbers.

 

Sent from my M8

Except I doubt many would be happy with 2gb of data...

 

I think Sprint did the smart thing.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard two interesting points....

 

1) Other "Forever" Programs are coming for other brand devices.

2) iPhone for $1 on a 2 Year Contract at Target

 

Did I hear this correctly?

 

 

Here's a transcript of the interview.  

 

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3519046-sprints-s-ceo-marcelo-claure-presents-at-goldman-sachs-24th-annual-communacopia-brokers-conference-transcript?part=single

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very curious about the iPhone (6 or 6s?) for $1 on contract.

 

The transcript shows he said 3 year contract instead of 2 so maybe he was mistaken all around.

 

Or maybe it will be a Black Friday kind of deal.  Who knows.

 

This type of offer has precedence:

 

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/58470/20150607/best-buy-offers-apple-iphone-6-for-1-with-contract-if-you-trade-in-working-iphone-5.htm

Edited by AppleFanBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very curious about the iPhone (6 or 6s?) for $1 on contract.

 

The transcript shows he said 3 year contract instead of 2 so maybe he was mistaken all around.

 

Or maybe it will be a Black Friday kind of deal.  Who knows.

 

This type of offer has precedence:

 

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/58470/20150607/best-buy-offers-apple-iphone-6-for-1-with-contract-if-you-trade-in-working-iphone-5.htm

Yeah a 2 year @ $1 makes sense to me. It is the Amazon strategy where they used to offer super cheap handsets but the fine print extended the 'penalty' time while in contract to like 18 months or something.

 

I think it is a smart bet especially if Sprint is creative about it by doing things like making it a promotion targeted at people in the announced Carrier Aggregation cities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint should offer the Wimax customers a free Sprint line of service for a year like they're doing for their DirectTV ad. I have a friend that's using Wimax for his home ISP and Sprint sent him a message basically telling him to find another ISP. No offers or anything. It's left a sour taste in his mouth of Sprint. If they offered him a full year of free Sprint service, he'd probably take them up on it.

 

It's a few hundred thousand people. Sprint could use those numbers.

 

Sent from my M8

 

Isn't WiMax already shut down in a whole bunch of places for Sprint's own B41 services? I could see some stragglers in the places where Clear was strong, but it doesn't help that most if not all the places Clear was, there was already other strong landline broadband choices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it obvious that Sprint just doesn't really want to be in the home ISP business?

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

 

Most people moved on already; my guess would be that very few even care. I have read on other forums (not this one) that the Clear customers who got cut off would be angry. My problem is that those people are such a tiny number compared to the large mass of people who could be very happy from fast B41 service on mobile devices. It isn't Sprint's job to be a crutch for inadequate landline broadband options. That should be on the landline broadband providers in a given area. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

iPhone 6s preorder emails just went out with a nice little bonus at the end:

 

 

vQ31Q38.jpg

That's nice of sprint to do that for folks on the IPhone forever. Too bad they aren't doing it for those like who who upgraded using easy pay.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...