Jump to content
joshuam

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, JossMan said:

Is 64 QAM capable on B25? 

On upload??? Yes and is live in many markets. Its live in my market anyway. According to my phone. What's the theoretical limit for 10mhz b25 on upload without 4x4 mimo and 64qam uplink??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any info yet on what the Intel modem on the new iPhone is going to support for Sprint's network

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any info on what these are ?24e7c21066377c823b00f856fd9367d9.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

Any info on what these are ?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Looks like a Verizon setup to me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like a Verizon setup to me. 
I should of zoomed in more .. these are on the Sprint set up f409ccc16b28f3b2a45686877e8db925.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

I should of zoomed in more .. these are on the Sprint set up

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

So what about the Ericsson gear?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

I should of zoomed in more .. these are on the Sprint set up =

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

That's Ericsson PCS and SMR RRUs. And the antenna next to it has Ericsson B41 and SMR RRUs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

I should of zoomed in more .. these are on the Sprint set up

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Oh sorry—I was looking at the rack above the Sprint rack. That appears to be a standard Sprint Ericsson setup. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh sorry—I was looking at the rack above the Sprint rack. That appears to be a standard Sprint Ericsson setup. 
I know in my Market we won't see any massive mimo anytime soon ( maybe only if the merger falls thru ) but in a Ericsson market would we still see nokia massive mimo or does Ericsson have their own

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tyroned3222 said:

I know in my Market we won't see any massive mimo anytime soon ( maybe only if the merger falls thru ) but in a Ericsson market would we still see nokia massive mimo or does Ericsson have their own

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I appear to be roaming on T-Mobile. 

http://imgur.com/a/kxLrRqz

Data works and everything. Odd that it's using a Clear PLMN.

- Trip

Edited by Trip
Fixed the link.
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I appear to be roaming on T-Mobile. 
http://imgur.com/a/kxLrRqz
Data works and everything. Odd that it's using a Clear PLMN.
- Trip
Interesting. Is it stable with that PLMN? Speeds?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It hasn't tried to kick me off. I don't normally do speed tests but I'm with a... slower person at the store.

http://imgur.com/a/VjWBnhn

Standing in the Wal-Mart in Farmville, VA and the signal is highly variable.

- Trip

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now it tried to drop me to eHRPD then Sprint LTE 1900 and then finally back to T-Mobile.

- Trip

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back from the store.  As a comparison, to show that it's T-Mobile, here's a screenshot of my T-Mobile phone from the parking lot (left it hidden in the car while we were in the store):

https://imgur.com/a/EPJ9wjd

You can see that it's the same other than the PLMN.

On the way home, it connected to a different T-Mobile site on the back roads, but it appears that Band 12 is not currently accessible to it.

- Trip

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Trip said:

Back from the store.  As a comparison, to show that it's T-Mobile, here's a screenshot of my T-Mobile phone from the parking lot (left it hidden in the car while we were in the store):

https://imgur.com/a/EPJ9wjd

You can see that it's the same other than the PLMN.

On the way home, it connected to a different T-Mobile site on the back roads, but it appears that Band 12 is not currently accessible to it.

- Trip

Same GCI, looks legit..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trip your findings are amazing. I can’t wait for this to take effect in my market. Nothing like getting LTE in more places.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting! So it would seem TMobile may be broadcasting the Clear PLMN? Maybe it's part of the roaming/integration plan? Also interesting that it still shows as roaming, even though it's using a "native" PLMN. I would have assumed that was used to determine if the R indicator should be shown, but apparently not.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting! So it would seem TMobile may be broadcasting the Clear PLMN? Maybe it's part of the roaming/integration plan? Also interesting that it still shows as roaming, even though it's using a "native" PLMN. I would have assumed that was used to determine if the R indicator should be shown, but apparently not.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


I myself thought this roaming wouldn't kick in until a certain amount of miles outside of city limits... But I guess the roaming also exists withing city limits...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I myself thought this roaming wouldn't kick in until a certain amount of miles outside of city limits... But I guess the roaming also exists withing city limits...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

No Sprint has been tuning their LTE roaming lately. Sometimes it will switch to AT&T roaming instead of going to 3G. I had this happen in Berkeley, CA few weeks ago. Presumably it's a way to make VoLTE more reliable. Ideally they would have it prefer roaming LTE vs native 3G only while on a call, unless the roaming doesn't count towards your roaming allowance.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps they are using the Clearwire PLMN because it is B2 rather than B25.

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps they are using the Clearwire PLMN because it is B2 rather than B25.

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk


But why not just use the T-Mobile PLMN? Unless this is how they decided to control which sites allow roaming? It still seems odd though, no other roaming partners do this to my knowledge. Unless that's the way T-Mobile implements roaming for some reason, by using a PLMN of the partner.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ingenium said:

But why not just use the T-Mobile PLMN? Unless this is how they decided to control which sites allow roaming? It still seems odd though, no other roaming partners do this to my knowledge. Unless that's the way T-Mobile implements roaming for some reason, by using a PLMN of the partner.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

PLM-NIDS can be used to prioritize or have special eNB side configurations for connected devices.

It's why Magic Box's  / LTE UE Relays have a specific PLMNID they connect to. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Following up, my phone also seems much more likely to connect to and hold US Cellular LTE roaming now.  I went by a tower with both Shentel and US Cellular on it, it happened to latch onto US Cellular LTE first (while connected to Shentel 1X) and held it all the way past the tower until I was just going out of range; saw just the LTE 800 briefly before moving onto the next Shentel site.

- Trip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I should have explicitly said cheaper.  4G will be around for a while with the average phone life at 3 years, meaning some keep their phone for 4 or 5 years or even longer.
    • Quite a number of us have been looking at this issue for months, which I call Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS). For those unfamiliar it eliminates the special 8T8R market GCI and reorders all GCI band sectors first by sector then by band.  Without software help this is uncomprehensible to most people. It took a while to get a reasonable sample of data from all sectors from various sites in various tracked markets.  Sprint was also making changes and initially had various models in different markets.  This has only been seen in Samsung markets, although I have looked at data from ALU and Ericsson markets. It should be noted that Mini Macros and B41 small cells are not affected.  It now seems to have stabilized for a while around what is shown in ingenium's chart: Implementation is growing and is getting faster.  Through the many logs I analyze I have seen it pop up in more and more markets.  Still uncertain as to the reason.  The latest theory is for 4x4 MIMO and 256 QAM with a long line of failed theories behind that one.  There are areas of uncertainty surrounding 1) counties with portions of various b41 radius on different frequencies and 2) the handling of 4th and 5th carriers.  We are hoping that Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) in Columbus and Cincinnati will soon spread to such areas so we have a better data sample.  Currently we only have the area around Youngstown to work with in this regard.  Joski1624 has been key in this along with ingenium. I have handled this with a cutover date for GCIs and tracking expired b41 GCIs.  Early on implementation stretched out over a couple of weeks, but it now seems entire sites are done at once.  I process logs first to find any Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) sites which are ranked into Yes, Maybe, and No.  "Yes" is determined unique GCI endings which can be increased if you have detailed spreadsheet data on the site that is reasonably current.  These become Approved SGS sites with the earliest one becoming the cutover date which is stored for future use.  "Maybe" are unique GCI endings that don't have an expected EARFCN.  Many of these are transition errors but a signification number are for sites where more data is needed.  These become possible SGS sites and are flagged for followup.  The approved SGS site data is then processed for new carriers and missing/changed PCIs.  B41 is converted back to its old GCI including GCI sectors for this purpose plus to provide data for the expired B41 sites.  The expired b41 sites is also used for Mini Macro GCIs that have been replaced with 8T8R in case they appear elsewhere in the future.  This effort allows old spreadsheets to be retained.    Should a market fully convert (none found so far) to Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) it will be worth revisiting this multi-step process to simplify it.  The unresolved issue of sites in counties with portions of various b41 radius on different frequencies is the most difficult for SCP.  Sheets may have to track earfcns for those areas and/or store the SGS sectors for them to be properly rebuilt for SCP "national" logs.  Markets with sheets will want to let SCP know the approved SGS sites as users may not be on the right band or sector to know independently. This way regular sites could be stored in their compressed format while only the SGS sites would need more entries. SCP may need to track SGS sites for markets without sheets based on past key GCI sectors.  This may also be the right time for SCP to allow the direct importation of true site lat/longs as RSRP allows for easier detection of EARFCNs in transition.  Another issue that would help is a more resilient error handling (retries) for rooted modem earfcns.  Currently this is often tripped by other apps such as LTE Discovery (used for its airplane mode like ability) or Network Signal Guru  (for bandwidth, MIMO and QAM detection).  Presently you must exit and restart SCP to regain EARFCN detection in such cases. Based on past history, it is safe to assume that Sprint will not totally upgrade all sites in a market to Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS), but  it will likely dominate  -- it will just take a while in true Sprint fashion.  Many of us S4Gru folks have retained older phones  (I have 4) for assigning to different signal tracking purposes.  The general public often has older phones just like these as their main phone.  Without Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) support older phones in SGS areas may soon become worthless for interactive signal detection and learning. 
    • Here's my multi-point theory on why Sprint isn't roaming on VZW for LTE: Fewer Sprint phones have B13 than B12, and at the point that you're roaming on another carrier you want that low-band signal, most of which is still B13 on VZW. VZW charges more for data roaming than AT&T does, and might not even let Sprint do LTE roaming. This is bolstered by the fact that e.g. FreedomPop uses AT&T rather than Verizon as the underlying network for its stuff...they wouldn't use it if it was expensive. Also, add the PH-1 to the list of unlocked/BYOD phones that likely have the same firmware as the Sprint version, and thus get WiFi calling (though the PH-1 doesn't have Calling Plus; fingers crossed that I get VoLTE). I've been in a few RF dead zones (yay hotels!) lately but have seen the phone drop down to native eHRPD rather than swap to roaming on e.g. T-Mo band 12, so my guess is that I won't see aggressive roaming to LTE until the VoLTE soft launch, and maybe not even then.
    • I'll be heading to the UK in a few months and am trying to figure out whether it's worth it to switch off of Open World (this'll be my first time out of the country, so it's not like I'm using CA/MX data anyway) and grabbing a week pass for while I'm there. Specifically, does anyone know which network Sprint roams on in the UK, and whether it's LTE roaming? If the roaming situation is less than ideal, I figure I'll keep Open World and swing by an EE or Three store to pick up a local SIM, using my 3-cent-per-MB Open World data to get there. But if I can get solid coverage on LTE, I'll gladly do the week pass thing to save the hassle of finding a SIM.
    • Pretty sure they can slowly repurpose LTE portion of M-MIMO to 5G nr so that shouldn't be a problem in the very long run. Just like Clear equipment, and those have served their purpose quite well over the last 6 years.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×