Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

Figured it would be one of the two companies but I'm not certain it'll be a flagship. Just like the HTC Bolt was Sprint's first gigabit LTE capable device, this could easily be a mid-range device that has 5G capability as its main selling point. Even Samsung mentioned that the S10 won't be its first 5G capable device.

I think they should learn from those mistakes and make it a full on halo device. That's really the only way to really get people's attention. 

Like the HTC EVO, it really made a dent in the industry. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 28.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • RedSpark

    2029

  • Arysyn

    1124

  • nexgencpu

    1019

  • WiWavelength

    938

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have to tell you all I am near tears right now.  I am so stoked that Marcelo listened to us, directly.  I am sure he listened to all the feedback he heard.  But I believe S4GRU was influential in th

I'm still shocked and amazed how successful S4GRU has been in staying online, remaining relevant and keeping quality members and staff all with member donations from a relatively small pool. When we

Maybe he's outside of the city limits. He'll tweet as soon as he's back in town with a data connection.

Posted Images

1 minute ago, kg4icg said:

First gigabit lte phone on sprint was the Galaxy S8, not the HTC bolt, the bolt maxed or at 600mb

I think the Bolt was the first 3xCA phone, and the Moto Play Z2 was first Gigabit LTE device.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, kg4icg said:

First gigabit lte phone on sprint was the Galaxy S8, not the HTC bolt, the bolt maxed out at 600mb

 

13 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

I think the Bolt was the first 3xCA phone, and the Moto Play Z2 was first Gigabit LTE device.

Whoops, that's what I was thinking of. Thanks for the correction.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

Isn't the X50 just a mmWave 5G radio?

Quote from Qualcomm X50 page..

https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/modems/5g/x50

"The QTM052 mmWave antenna module family and the Qualcomm® QPM56xx sub-6 GHz RF module family combine with the Snapdragon X50 5G modem to deliver modem-to-antenna capabilities across several spectrum bands, in a very compact footprint that is suited for integration in mobile devices."

Link to post
Share on other sites
My post was meant as satire. The serious question is, does the Pixel 1, 2 (or both) support 2x CA UL?
No, neither support UL CA.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I'd do the honors lol and whats crazy this is only the beginning.. this seems to be their first real big push towards improving the Network across the Nation

 

https://twitter.com/SprintCTO/status/1030080324217102336?s=19

 

 

Still need the merger ?

5d8caf8047930f54a8a4f5549e820367.jpg

 

Well, Sprint gets to check this one off as a big win

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

I thought I'd do the honors lol and whats crazy this is only the beginning.. this seems to be their first real big push towards improving the Network across the Nation

 

 

 

Still need the merger ?

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

Honestly they have all the tools to really bring it with 5G hell even with 4G(we all know what happened there). They just lack  scale which is going to possibly be a problem for 5G and density.  If Sprint can get to together, I have no problem coming back for their 5G network cause I know they can outdo the competition and not have a crap ton of small cells on every other block cause of MmWave. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly they have all the tools to really bring it with 5G hell even with 4G(we all know what happened there). They just lack  scale which is going to possibly be a problem for 5G and density.  If Sprint can get to together, I have no problem coming back for their 5G network cause I know they can outdo the competition and not have a crap ton of small cells on every other block cause of MmWave. 
Yup and Sprint still has less user per site ... So the network should run very smooth and fast .. in a lot of cities all the Network needed in most cases was just getting tri band on their grid

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tyroned3222 said:

I thought I'd do the honors lol and whats crazy this is only the beginning.. this seems to be their first real big push towards improving the Network across the Nation

 

https://twitter.com/SprintCTO/status/1030080324217102336?s=19

 

 

Still need the merger ?

 

Well, Sprint gets to check this one off as a big win

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All this without 4x4MIMO in NYC! Once that's enabled, I don't see how any of the other carriers will touch Sprint.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

All this without 4x4MIMO in NYC! Once that's enabled, I don't see how any of the other carriers will touch Sprint.

The nail that sticks up gets hammered down.  Within 6 months both Verizon and AT&T will have answered this*.  Sprint improves in so few places that it does not cost the duo much to answer each one before the public catches on and Sprint can reap significant rewards.  Such a reply is much more difficult with T-Mobile since they have significant cash flow.

* I have seen this happen many times over the years.

Still improvements like this should be celebrated by us Sprint users!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

The nail that sticks up gets hammered down.  Within 6 months both Verizon and AT&T will have answered this*.  Sprint improves in so few places that it does not cost the duo much to answer each one before the public catches on and Sprint can reap significant rewards.  Such a reply is much more difficult with T-Mobile since they have significant cash flow.

* I have seen this happen many times over the years.

Still improvements like this should be celebrated by us Sprint users!!

 I think NYC is unique in the sense that all carriers are super dense and are using pretty much most of their spectrum (Refarming is only way to get around this and Tmobile has some unused 600Mhz, but what about 5G?) But the other 3 players already have most of their spectrum at play and also 4x4MIMO live. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

The nail that sticks up gets hammered down.  Within 6 months both Verizon and AT&T will have answered this*.  Sprint improves in so few places that it does not cost the duo much to answer each one before the public catches on and Sprint can reap significant rewards.  Such a reply is much more difficult with T-Mobile since they have significant cash flow.

* I have seen this happen many times over the years.

Still improvements like this should be celebrated by us Sprint users!!

That’s a great point. We’ve seen this happen with Sprint before, where it would gain the lead in a flagship market like Chicago only to lose it after 6 - 12 Months as the other carriers catch up.

Is the pace of network improvements at this point primarily limited by available capex, available work crews or available equipment?

I hope they can bring some strand mounts or other rapid network improvements to the Bethany Beach, DE and Ocean City, MD areas. I was there several years ago and the network coverage was terrible. I currently have family there now on Sprint (with an S8+ and HTC U11) and they’re telling me it’s still terrible.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

 I think NYC is unique in the sense that all carriers are super dense and are using pretty much most of their spectrum (Refarming is only way to get around this and Tmobile has some unused 600Mhz, but what about 5G?) But the other 3 players already have most of their spectrum at play and also 4x4MIMO live. 

5G is the truly unique item for Sprint.  Do they have enough cash to make it fully work in a few markets?  Ideally you would want all sites with Massive MIMO, which would be best done in a market where Sprint has all the B41 spectrum.  If they do just a handful of sites in each market, people will quickly see through that and only the innovators will buy 5G phones.

Link to post
Share on other sites
That’s a great point. We’ve seen this happen with Sprint before, where it would gain the lead in a flagship market like Chicago only to lose it after 6 - 12 Months as the other carriers catch up.
Is the pace of network improvements at this point primarily limited by available capex, available work crews or available equipment?
I hope they can bring some strand mounts or other rapid network improvements to the Bethany Beach, DE and Ocean City, MD areas. I was there several years ago and the network coverage was terrible. I currently have family there now on Sprint (with an S8+ and HTC U11) and they’re telling me it’s still terrible.
This time around it's different ( imo).. Sprint was very indecisive in the past( they only kind of Improved in those market and didn't go all out 100%).

Sprint knows what's at risk and this time around i don't see them letting up.. at nextgencpu pointed out this was achieve pure spectrum and small cells.. so, Sprint celebrate this a few days and gets back to work.. running higher back haul, implementing 4x4 mimo, and massive is next and more aggressive throughout NYC.. I think this is only the beginning now Sprint will let loose

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

5G is the truly unique item for Sprint.  Do they have enough cash to make it fully work in a few markets?  Ideally you would want all sites with Massive MIMO, which would be best done in a market where Sprint has all the B41 spectrum.  If they do just a handful of sites in each market, people will quickly see through that and only the innovators will buy 5G phones.

That’s a great question and point you raised. We experienced this with 8T8R antennas where it seemed like the news about them vastly exceeded the actual deployments.

Sprint laid out its 5G deployment expectations in its Public Interest Statement on Pages 23-25: https://newtmobile.com/content/uploads/2018/06/T-Mobile-Sprint-Public-Interest-Statement.pdf

It’s not a particularly rosy picture. There’s a lot more detail in the subsequent pages.

The specific number of Massive MIMO sites Sprint expects to update in 2018-2019 and by 2020 is redacted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of years back they were close or the best carrier in Chicago, and during the last 12 months, they fell back to the end of the line.  Even better in Denver, they led the overall award for 4 straight quarters, and now it has fallen back to the end of the pack. I hate to agree with Massa Son, but this is where scale plays a big role, the twin bells only need to drop millions on upgrades or densification without hurting their wallet and its put them back to the top on any particular market.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • That's actually important information. If the Velvet can't get NR CA with a Sprint SIM, but can with a TMo one, that does indicate that the S21 may have something similar going on. At which point I don't think it's a matter of TMo wanting one way or the other. Rather, Sprint's core can't do NR CA because n41 was going to be the only band.
    • I agree. What differentiates the Everything Data plan from kickstart except hotspot and unthrottled data?    As for 5g I can get NSA 5g on a sprint sim (tna) but cannot get SA 5g unless I TNX and get throttled to 2.3 on video... Crazy.
    • I would say given the Everything Data plan wording and the premium price paid for Everything Data, you should have unthrottled.  If true, for me personally, this makes the purchase of any 5G phone from T-Mobile undesirable given that TNX is required to get 5G at all.  Where I live inside the Columbus Ohio beltway, the speed ranking is Sprint, then AT&T, then T-Mobile, then Verizon.  T-Mobile has improved, but not enough to change their ranking.  T-Mobile would likely win if they converted one of the two Sprint only sites near me to T-Mobile (no permits seen). The throttling should be validated against the physical network.  What happens if only band b25 is allowed so it is only on Sprint even with the TNX network?
    • Just drove by there today and SE03XC157 is back online. I guess the aforementioned wind storm temporarily knocked it offline.
    • Fast appears to be 20% slower than other speed tests... I have a 250 up and down fiber connect at home.. regularly at 270.   Just did a fast test twice... barely hit 200
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...