Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Sprint needs to spend 2018 chasing down areas where there is no ability to use data while on a Sprint device.  This can be due to no service areas or saturated data connections on Sprint's or their roaming partner's networks.  The "can you hear me now" guy should change into the "can you use data everywhere you go" guy.   I am not concerned if the coverage is Sprint's or extended LTE roaming as long as it has a reasonable speed to use VoLTE and use the apps that I use on my phone. 

I believe Verizon's focus for years with improving their network was first targeting voice coverage and after that targeting any area of the country where their customers were getting less than 1mbps download speed.  They may have since increased that 1mbps threshold to something higher and are now focused on small cells to fix coverage issues deep within buildings and between their macro sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint needs to spend 2018 chasing down areas where there is no ability to use data while on a Sprint device.  This can be due to no service areas or saturated data connections on Sprint's or their roaming partner's networks.  The "can you hear me now" guy should change into the "can you use data everywhere you go" guy.   I am not concerned if the coverage is Sprint's or extended LTE roaming as long as it has a reasonable speed to use VoLTE and use the apps that I use on my phone. 
I believe Verizon's focus for years with improving their network was first targeting voice coverage and after that targeting any area of the country where their customers were getting less than 1mbps download speed.  They may have since increased that 1mbps threshold to something higher and are now focused on small cells to fix coverage issues deep within buildings and between their macro sites.
Yeah. They need to do something VZW 1X will be gone come 2020.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Yeah. They need to do something VZW 1X will be gone come 2020.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

I'd hope by 2020 our phones will be primarily using VoLTE for voice supported by USCC/AT&T LTE roaming. I rarely use VZW 1x anymore unless I'm in very certain spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they did that they could pass att on LTE as att doesn't have plans to add LTE to H+ areas. 
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


They don't? That's exactly what they're doing...

Especially with the upcoming FirstNet build.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WiseGuy321 said:

 


They don't? That's exactly what they're doing...

Especially with the upcoming FirstNet build.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Right now they are prioritizing LTE upgrades on towers that are still WCDMA only. Until that is done, they are putting HSPA-capable towers on the back burner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/sprint-hints-at-6-gbps-peak-speeds-over-lte-network

 

Quote

Today, Ottendorfer said Sprint makes use of roughly 60 MHz of spectrum with 2x2 MIMO and 64 QAM across three sectors. He noted that Sprint has already tweaked several of those figures in order to reach LTE speeds approaching 1 Gbps. And in Sprint’s LTE network evolution Ottendorfer said the carrier can potentially—partly through the application of its massive trove of 2.5 GHz spectrum holdings—increase those figures to 120 MHz, 64x64 MIMO (16 layers per sector carrier) and 256 QAM to reach theoretical peak speeds of up to 6 Gbps

That's insanity, even theoretically. Will be interesting to see if they can even get anywhere near that.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JThorson said:

https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/sprint-hints-at-6-gbps-peak-speeds-over-lte-network

 

That's insanity, even theoretically. Will be interesting to see if they can even get anywhere near that.

 

With those speeds, my edges and head will be scalped bald, follicles gone along with any other hair on my face. 

6Gbps is insanely fast. This is good to know the true potential of their spectrum. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, JonnygATL said:

Either way this victimization culture is nauseating, at best.  Flippin millenials!

Sorry, no. The whole blaming of millenials has got to stop. I'm so tired of getting blamed for everything because of my age. When in fact the real problem is those who we were raised by. We "learned from the best!"

We have the issues we have because we blame the young people for everything, while in reality - not everyone - the majority bust our butts to make our lives and everyones lives better.

 https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58b9a358e4b0d2821b4dd797/amp

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, rocketr said:

I just want 256 QAM... wondering when that will happen

Why do you want it so badly?  The downlink rarely will possess the SINR to use 256QAM.

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you want it so badly?  The downlink rarely will possess the SINR to use 256QAM.
AJ
I just know on T-Moble it really helped network reliability and speed. Also I think they should work on multiple band CA between 800 and 1900 then keep the B41 CA how it is...

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you want it so badly?  The downlink rarely will possess the SINR to use 256QAM.
AJ
One other thing... doesn't it make the cell spectrum more efficient and increase capacity overall ?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, rocketr said:

I just know on T-Moble it really helped network reliability and speed.

You "know" that 256QAM helped both reliability and speed on T-Mobile?  How?

Reliability, it did not, just the opposite.

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You "know" that 256QAM helped both reliability and speed on T-Mobile?  How?
Reliability, it did not, just the opposite.
AJ
I just know from my data speed testing before and after it was implemented... I guess that might be a narrow view

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, kg4icg said:

I just want a sirloin cooked medium with steak fries and a side of beer battered shrimp, with a tall cold beer. 

I'll take a Matsasuka beef grade A5, medium rare, side of tenpanyaki oysters and clam, desert entree', and a pint of Sapporo. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lilotimz said:

I'll take a Matsasuka beef grade A5, medium rare, side of tenpanyaki oysters and clam, desert entree', and a pint of Sapporo. 

i just want a nice skirt steak with barbecue sauce preferable A1 steak sauce and a nice glass of captain morgan spice rum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P_46_large.jpg

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
    • Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...