Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Killing off iDen and Wimax was always the goal after those Tech's were defunked.

 

Had nothing to do with desperation. But despite Sprints best efforts something always delayed their plans. From border issues with iBEZ to schools not wanting to accept Sprints offers to transition away from Wimax.

 

For the first time in a very long time, Sprint's destiny is in its own hands.

You missed the point I was making. The years before NV was conceived was years of Sprint spliting CAPEX between 3 technologies, weakening their core CDMA network to the point it was not longer competitive and a wimax network that wasn't nation wide. This forced sprint into a position where NV was the last hail marry play they had left. It was even described at the time as a "bet the company" play at the time.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To this day I am still impressed with Sprint's NV 1.0 deployment, an entire brand new 3G/4G LTE network, shutting down iDEN and WiMax, re-tuning 800MHz for voice and LTE, and simultaneously adding, configuring, and optimizing LTE. A job well done!

I feel optimization could be better, especially on B26 which quite frankly for low band sucks.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed the point I was making. The years before NV was conceived was years of Sprint spliting CAPEX between 3 technologies, weakening their core CDMA network to the point it was not longer competitive and a wimax network that wasn't nation wide. This forced sprint into a position where NV was the last hail marry play they had left. It was even described at the time as a "bet the company" play at the time.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

And the Hail Mary worked. Here we are still

talking about Sprint 5 years later...

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the Hail Mary worked. Here we are still

talking about Sprint 5 years later...

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

Wimax was clearwire not Sprint. Im pretty much over hearing about Wimax. Marcelo and, his Team had Nothing to do with that.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CapEx for the network last year was $1.95 billion. Sprint is projecting they'll spend $3.5 to $4 billion over the 12 month period beginning last month. So no as of right now CapEx isn't the same. Sprint is expecting to spend nearly if not more than double what they spent on the network last year.

It started out the same.  Last year ended poorly.  Lets hope that this isn't a repeat.  Inflate CAPEX for 2017 to please investors, lower it every Q after. 

 

I would no be surprised to see this happen.  Sprint has extremely expensive notes due in 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed the point I was making. The years before NV was conceived was years of Sprint spliting CAPEX between 3 technologies, weakening their core CDMA network to the point it was not longer competitive and a wimax network that wasn't nation wide. This forced sprint into a position where NV was the last hail marry play they had left. It was even described at the time as a "bet the company" play at the time.

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Really it was just two networks, Clearwire dealt with WiMAX. Really even after Sprint bought them there wasn't a whole ton of redundancy, they kept most of that around for B41 LTE. WiMAX was shuttered more to free up the spectrum than to remove redundancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways, the only difference I think Sprint ought to make with giving these Magic Boxes to their customers, is to offer an incentive, such as a $5-$10 bill reduction that helps customers with the added cost of electricity, and as fair compensation for helping boost its network by taking up space inside their homes and businesses.

 

To be honest, I don't think most people look this closely at their electric bills... especially to notice a minuscule increase from this device.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

such as hpue, magic box and small cells and these are not really available to other carriers.  

 

 

But they are though...

 

HPUE: 3GPP proposed HPUE for Band 14 in Rel 11 of the LTE standard, so we should see AT&T using HPUE for their FirstNet spectrum.

 

Small cells: Verizon (and AT&T) have been deploying small cells for years. T-Mo was able to take over MetroPCS' oDAS systems in many major cities and are deploying small cells of their own. If anything, Sprint is last to this race.

 

Magic Box: T-Mobile has a very similar LTE box (I understand the differences between the two) already, but like I said when T-Mobile brought theirs out; It's a band-aid to a much larger problem.

 

They lack density and B25/26 need to be better optimized across the US. I would much rather see stronger B25/26 signal. 

 

tl;dr? Sprint is merely utilizing tools that everyone else already has...

Edited by WiseGuy321
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they are though...

 

HPUE: 3GPP proposed HPUE for Band 14 in Rel 11 of the LTE standard, so we should see AT&T using HPUE for their FirstNet spectrum.

 

Small cells: Verizon (and AT&T) have been deploying small cells for years. T-Mo was able to take over MetroPCS' oDAS systems in many major cities. If anything, Sprint is last to this race.

 

Magic Box: T-Mobile has a very similar LTE box (I understand the differences between the two) already, but like I said when T-Mobile brought theirs out; It's a band-aid solution to a much larger problem. They lack density and B25/26 need to be better optimized across the US.

 

tl;dr? Sprint is merely utilizing tools that everyone else already has...

2.5 definitely has it's benefits and HPUE and this magic box are "mostly" unique to Sprint. Not too many carriers have options to dedicate spectrum for a "signal booster"

 

Until ATT certify their own version of HPUE, it's still unique for now.

 

Small cells are a different story all together, they have indeed been around forever. But this again is one of Sprint's strong suits since they can avoid potential interference using dedicated spectrum and due to it's high band they can minimize it's size. But the idea of small cells is not at all original to Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they are though...

 

Small cells: Verizon (and AT&T) have been deploying small cells for years. T-Mo was able to take over MetroPCS' oDAS systems in many major cities and are deploying small cells of their own. If anything, Sprint is last to this race.

 

In many cities this may be the case, but in Los Angeles Sprint was not the last to the race. Sprint built out an impressive network of oDAS systems in the canyons and hills around the city. This system was around far longer than the NextG sites built for MetroPCS.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HPUE: 3GPP proposed HPUE for Band 14 in Rel 11 of the LTE standard, so we should see AT&T using HPUE for their FirstNet spectrum.

 

 

This is a first responders only band. I'm not sure why people all over the web are talking about it as if it At&t is going to use it for public use. No at&t subscriber will have access to it.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a first responders only band. I'm not sure why people all over the web are talking about it as if it At&t is going to use it for public use. No at&t subscriber will have access to it.

 

That's not true.

 

Consumers will have B14 access, but First Responders and other emergency personnel get 1st priority.

Edited by WiseGuy321
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a first responders only band. I'm not sure why people all over the web are talking about it as if it At&t is going to use it for public use. No at&t subscriber will have access to it.

That's not what I've heard. I've heard att will have access to some of it. First responders have priority first tho.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You missed the point I was making. The years before NV was conceived was years of Sprint spliting CAPEX between 3 technologies, weakening their core CDMA network to the point it was not longer competitive and a wimax network that wasn't nation wide. This forced sprint into a position where NV was the last hail marry play they had left. It was even described at the time as a "bet the company" play at the time.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

They did nearly nothing with WiMax! Test sites, retainment sites...  and so forth... I was one of the fools that bought an HTC Smart phone with Wimax with the maditory $10 premium data fee just to use 3g the life of the phone.  Sprint kept promising Wimax deployment in the Detroit area... never really happed.     You are far too kind with Sprint.  They really should have refunded all the $10 per month premium fees for their customers who had a WiMax phone but no WiMax in their area!    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did nearly nothing with WiMax! Test sites, retainment sites... and so forth... I was one of the fools that bought an HTC Smart phone with Wimax with the maditory $10 premium data fee just to use 3g the life of the phone. Sprint kept promising Wimax deployment in the Detroit area... never really happed. You are far too kind with Sprint. They really should have refunded all the $10 per month premium fees for their customers who had a WiMax phone but no WiMax in their area!

Clearwire was wimax. Sprint thought clearwire was going to bring​it there. Even Sprint didn't like the whole thing. I'm tired of hearing about Wimax. It's gone, clearwire is gone and, the Sprint team from back then is gone. Marcelos team had nothing to do with that.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nexgencpu summed up precisely what I had in mind regarding wiseguy321 comments.  In the era of capacity, high band spectrum and lots of it matters.  None of the other carriers have the enough spectrum to set aside for backhaul for small cells both indoors and outdoors.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really it was just two networks, Clearwire dealt with WiMAX. Really even after Sprint bought them there wasn't a whole ton of redundancy, they kept most of that around for B41 LTE. WiMAX was shuttered more to free up the spectrum than to remove redundancy.

ok... I have to ask... wasn't the 2500 mHz spun off of Sprint back in the Gary Forsee days?   Sprint originally owned that spectrum... Ie I bought a WiMax phone.   Later Sprint was in trouble... Clearwire, just a puppet on a string for Sprint anyway, also never had any money!  Nearly bankrupt soon after forming. 2500 mHz went to them only to be re-bought at the time of Clearwire being bought.   It was a huge mess!

Edited by dro1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok... I have to ask... wasn't the 2500 mHz spun off of Sprint back in the Gary Forsee days? Sprint originally owned that spectrum... Ie I bought a WiMax phone. Later Sprint was in trouble... Clearwire was formed, 2500 mHz went to them only to be re-bought at the time of Clearwire being bought. It was a huge mess!

My question is why we are still talking about this? LTE covers what wimax didn't. It's time to move on and, get over it. Feels like a waste of time.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not true.

 

Consumers will have B14 access, but First Responders and other emergency personnel get 1st priority.

That's not what I've heard. I've heard att will have access to some of it. First responders have priority first tho.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

I have read nothing alluding to this. The only thing that has been confirmed is that all first responders and FirstNet users will have access to all of At&t's current bands.

 

As a matter of fact, the following is from the first press release. See the bolded area.

 

AT&T will deliver a dedicated, interoperable network and ecosystem that will give first responders the technology they need to better communicate and collaborate across agencies and jurisdictions – local, state and national.

Unless someone can show me where at&t says the FirstNet network will be open for commercial use, then this will do nothing to enhance at&t user experience. If anything, it hurts the at&t subscribers as first responders will be able to access at&t bands and get first priority. So if a cop who is eating lunch decides to watch YouTube, at&t users in the area are SOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is why we are still talking about this? LTE covers what wimax didn't. It's time to move on and, get over it. Feels like a waste of time.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Technically, this may not be true. I believe there may still be some wimax protection sites that never got LTE conversion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that this "Magic Box" is another gimmick or fad like the whole "Direct 2 You" service.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically, this may not be true. I believe there may still be some wimax protection sites that never got LTE conversion.

That still doesn't have anything to do with cities that didn't get Wimax that have LTE "now"

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that this "Magic Box" is another gimmick or fad like the whole "Direct 2 You" service.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gimmick or fad? It extends the LTE network indoors in places where it exists only outdoors. There will always be buildings where something like this is useful. Femtocells are more common now with more ubiqutous LTE on other providers. Not less.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...