Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Good for Sprint, though I'm beginning to believe John Legere about the treatment being shown towards T-Mobile by RootMetrics.

Not really, they are just getting dinged by less than stellar voice performance, just like Sprint takes a hit due to not so great upload speeds
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, they are just getting dinged by less than stellar voice performance, just like Sprint takes a hit due to not so great upload speeds

That is true about T-Mobile. Voice quality still isn't great on T-Mobile, one thing I do miss about Sprint for sure is VQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the map be updated to reflect those areas where we will roaming on AT&T? Also does it count toward your roaming allotment or not?

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

It is pure roaming, so it comes out of your 100MB cap.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what would have expected? Sprint to randomly expand into areas they have never offered service? Protection sites were never officially part of the network, what would cause that to change when Sprint took over Clearwire. They were there to protect the license agreements. With Sprint's deployment of B41, they have fulfilled the agreements. No reason for protection sites to exist.

I'm not expecting anything. I'm just pointing out an incorrect statement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if you have watched the townhall meetings posted here about the small cells. Health is one of the top reasons people state as the reasons they don't want towers in the area. Looks are one of the reasons but even when it is pointed out that the meetings are about setting rules for small cells looks people go on about it doesn't matter what they look like because they would still be "bad" for health reasons.

I don't know which city council meetings you're talking about. The only two I've seen or read the minutes for are for Cave Creek, AZ and Navasota, TX. And both meetings only showed concerns for aesthetics.

 

The "radiation" folks of these meetings don't usually end up winning. We all know that. What it usually comes down to is zoning and HOA rules. Mobilitie wants poles on the side of roads that tower over current utility poles, and that is the issue I have seen on both meetings. If they hide them and promise to comply with zoning laws, they usually have no problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, they are just getting dinged by less than stellar voice performance, just like Sprint takes a hit due to not so great upload speeds

I see the B25 reframing in areas that are higher than 5x5 helping their uploads along with upload CA.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At&t must be giving Sprint a good roaming deal. I'm roaming on them in uscc territory.

SCP has been displaying uscc as att. That app needs a update. Uscc as att still shows att B12 as B17. Boost devices are still showing Clearwire as B25. So it has issues.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, they are just getting dinged by less than stellar voice performance, just like Sprint takes a hit due to not so great upload speeds

T-Mobile has a good amount of areas where rootmetrics makes them look just fine. Like Data Speeds.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is pure roaming, so it comes out of your 100MB cap.

Is that really att tho? Or is that SCP error? He should be roaming onto uscc LTE.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCP has been displaying uscc as att. That app needs a update. Uscc as att still shows att B12 as B17. Boost devices are still showing Clearwire as B25. So it has issues.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

 

Is that really att tho? Or is that SCP error? He should be roaming onto uscc LTE.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

AT&T roaming is real. It appears devices are now allowed to connect to different networks for 1x and LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T roaming is real. It appears devices are now allowed to connect to different networks for 1x and LTE.

 

Devices capable of SRLTE or SVLTE can juggle separate LTE and CDMA1X networks.  Devices that are limited to e/CSFB, as far as I know, cannot.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe this is in error because I never had the ability to roam on USCC LTE. Suddenly this appears after others have been reporting AT&T roaming. I just didn't expect to see it in USCC​ territory. I have a note 5, so I have srlte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that really att tho? Or is that SCP error? He should be roaming onto uscc LTE.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

 

Looks like it's real. AT&T's MCC/MNC is 310-410

 

I wonder how they will handle voice roaming on AT&T. Could we see HSPA for voice or VoLTE support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it's real. AT&T's MCC/MNC is 310-410

 

I wonder how they will handle voice roaming on AT&T. Could we see HSPA for voice or VoLTE support?

Voice falls to 1x...for now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the map be updated to reflect those areas where we will roaming on AT&T? Also does it count toward your roaming allotment or not?

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

The whole roaming agreement still seems to be in testing so I wouldn't expect anything in the immediate future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is pure roaming, so it comes out of your 100MB cap.

I roamed about 500MB on AT&T last month and interestingly enough, it's not showing up as roaming usage on MySprint...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCP has been displaying uscc as att. That app needs a update. Uscc as att still shows att B12 as B17. Boost devices are still showing Clearwire as B25. So it has issues.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Nope. It's AT&T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know which city council meetings you're talking about. The only two I've seen or read the minutes for are for Cave Creek, AZ and Navasota, TX. And both meetings only showed concerns for aesthetics.

 

The "radiation" folks of these meetings don't usually end up winning. We all know that. What it usually comes down to is zoning and HOA rules. Mobilitie wants poles on the side of roads that tower over current utility poles, and that is the issue I have seen on both meetings. If they hide them and promise to comply with zoning laws, they usually have no problems.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1776-network-visionlte-baltimore-market-including-annapoliseast-shore/page-24&do=findComment&comment=493661

about 50 mins and 1h7min in they talk about health reasons. I believe they are the 2nd and 6th question there were more after that. The meeting was about what limits could they put on the looks and placement of the sites. 

 

There were others meeting where health effects was a main topic I believe they were Charlotte and New Orleans if you wanted to look in those threads. New Orleans may have been just some one complaining about health after they learn a site went up out side their business when work was being done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T roaming is real. It appears devices are now allowed to connect to different networks for 1x and LTE.

Think they will drop VZW? Seems expensive to roam on both.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just B17 roaming, or will we see roaming on AT&T B2/4/5/29/30/66?

I have personally roamed on both B17 and B2 so chances are that it's active on most if not all bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Voice falls to 1x...for now...

Att doesn't have 1X unless it's roaming onto VZW 1x and, then att for LTE.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think they will drop VZW? Seems expensive to roam on both.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Looks like it. Sprint's roaming agreement with Verizon expires very soon and Verizon plans to shut its CDMA network down in two years. In my area, all of the new Verizon macros I've come across are LTE only and CDMA is being thinned or shut down on many existing macros. All of this being said, it's only natural that Sprint would shop around for the best rates for LTE roaming. Looks like AT&T may have offered them the best deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...