Jump to content

Galaxy Tab 4 Wifi and LTE versions


Destroyallcubes

Recommended Posts

So I have had the chance to play around with the Tab 4(Wi-fi) only model, and Like how much smoother it is than the Tab 3 series. Now What are some of your favorite features About the device? Hopefully sprint will announce one with Tri-band support. I will Grab one when they come out if they do!

I believe the Tab 4 on Sprint will have Triband, as the Verizon has 3 band LTE support and At&t version have 4 bands I believe. 

 

Also if you are looking for a Tab 4 Wifi only version, Check Target out, it has a Cartwheel coupon for 10% off a Tab 4, plus 20% off a Tab 3. And I want to say a coupon off Other Samsung Accessories! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a ipad mini with sprint and it's not too bad.

 

I really like how fast it picks up LTE. But i'll probably be getting a hotspot and get a better tablet. With the hotspot I'll have more options.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a ipad mini with sprint and it's not too bad.

 

I really like how fast it picks up LTE. But i'll probably be getting a hotspot and get a better tablet. With the hotspot I'll have more options.

Yeah I thought about picking a hotspot up, and possible saving a little bit more money up , and then buying the new surface, or Higher end Samsung Tablet. Any suggestions, And I wouldn't mind giving Apple a try, Just Would prefer expandable memory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7" with Sprint Tri-band LTE was approved by the FCC OET yesterday, June 18.

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=819946&fcc_id=A3LSMT237P

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7" with Sprint Tri-band LTE was approved by the FCC OET yesterday, June 18.

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=819946&fcc_id=A3LSMT237P

20mhz PCS bandwidth!? Wow and it's triband. Hmm the only thing is RF performance isn't looking so good
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20mhz PCS bandwidth!? Wow and it's triband. Hmm the only thing is RF performance isn't looking so good

Nope. Sad. Hopefully the antenna gain helps. I'll have to re look though the docs to see if the gain shows up.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Sad. Hopefully the antenna gain helps. I'll have to re look though the docs to see if the gain shows up.

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

I know the Tab 3 had poor RF performance as well. Hopefully gain will be higher. Any idea why they added 15/20mhz PCS support?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a ipad mini with sprint and it's not too bad.

 

I really like how fast it picks up LTE. But i'll probably be getting a hotspot and get a better tablet. With the hotspot I'll have more options.

The one huge benefit of the Sprint iPad Air and Mini Retina cellular versions is that they're unlocked and work on all carriers. True, there's no Spark but they do have LTE800 plus the LTE bands of the other major North American providers. I wish Samsung will someday go the same route as Apple and start making single-SKU devices like this. Their tablets are getting better with every generation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sprint needs to bring better tablet game than this. At least one high end android and windows tablet.

How little people know what Sprint has hiding in their pipeline. Sprint only said this is their first Spark tablet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How little people know what Sprint has hiding in their pipeline. Sprint only said this is their first Spark tablet.

Just saying dude. They need them. They have the worst tablet selection. I would get one if they had one worth while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying dude. They need them. They have the worst tablet selection. I would get one if they had one worth while.

They have one that's worthwhile. And it should be available before Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of 10" screen tablet, Last year a Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 with LTE was approved by the FCC for Sprint, but I do not recall ever seeing that tablet on the Sprint Website. In fact I went in search to see if there were any topics over in the Sprint site and there was one thread asking when Sprint is going to support the device. Although one poster stated that they bought it off of QVC with the Sprint logo on it. I find that hard to believe that any retailer would sell a device with a company/carrier logo before actually showing up on the company's website.

 

Anyway, I wouldn't mind seeing any Note type tablet like the 8.0, 10.1 or 12.2 Note Pro though to be honest.

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Employees will be able to buy this at launch. Ill order mine friday and by monday or tuesday when i get the tab ill get some b26 and b25 screenshots. I should be able to do plenty of speed test on my $20/20gb plan

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Employees will be able to buy this at launch. Ill order mine friday and by monday or tuesday when i get the tab ill get some b26 and b25 screenshots. I should be able to do plenty of speed test on my $20/20gb plan

That is a nice plan!

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying dude. They need them. They have the worst tablet selection. I would get one if they had one worth while.

I think it's about time you take a self imposed vacation from S4GRU. Come back in a week or two because at this point you're looking for just about anything to complain about. You're literally complaining about tablet selection at this point.

 

It's already shown that most people only use tablets on Wi-Fi and Sprint carries two of the most popular by sales, the iPads and Tab 3.

 

The only tablet worth having that Sprint doesn't carry is a Note series tablet. Which they've carried in the past with poor sales. No one is buying an Xperia or Nokia tablet. To add to this, as much as you complain about Sprint service and love the other 3 providers you carry I highly doubt if you were buying a tablet that Sprint would be your first choice. So which tablet did you decide you're picking up through one of them?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's about time you take a self imposed vacation from S4GRU. Come back in a week or two because at this point you're looking for just about anything to complain about. You're literally complaining about tablet selection at this point.

 

It's already shown that most people only use tablets on Wi-Fi and Sprint carries two of the most popular by sales, the iPads and Tab 3.

 

The only tablet worth having that Sprint doesn't carry is a Note series tablet. Which they've carried in the past with poor sales. No one is buying an Xperia or Nokia tablet. To add to this, as much as you complain about Sprint service and love the other 3 providers you carry I highly doubt if you were buying a tablet that Sprint would be your first choice. So which tablet did you decide you're picking up through one of them?

I already have a Verizon G Pad. My profile would have told you that. But that's a fact that Sprints tablet selection is the weakest. Cellular tablet sales are going up with the quickness. If Sprint expanded on that it would be a good thing. That's my whole point. It doesn't seem that sprint is really concerned about its tablet options. Also which would you want to do have a tablet with LTE data and save battery or have your phone crap out in a few hours from tethering for so long to your tablet? Options is never a bad thing is all I'm saying. I have a way of making things sound offensive sometimes. I'm not very good at taking the subtle approach. You take it like I'm all out trolling when I'm not. Why would I troll? I'm a S4GRU veteran that's said just as much good about Sprint as bad. If at this present time Sprint has more negatives for me than positives then it is what it is. Every carrier has there good, bad and ugly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I already have a Verizon G Pad. My profile would have told you that. But that's a fact that Sprints tablet selection is the weakest. Cellular tablet sales are going up with the quickness. If Sprint expanded on that it would be a good thing. That's my whole point. It doesn't seem that sprint is really concerned about its tablet options. Also which would you want to do have a tablet with LTE data and save battery or have your phone crap out in a few hours from tethering for so long to your tablet? Options is never a bad thing is all I'm saying. I have a way of making things sound offensive sometimes. I'm not very good at taking the subtle approach. You take it like I'm all out trolling when I'm not. Why would I troll? I'm a S4GRU veteran that's said just as much good about Sprint as bad. If at this present time Sprint has more negatives for me than positives then it is what it is. Every carrier has there good, bad and ugly.

 

Everyone here doesn't keep their profile up-to-date, so I don't go off the devices they have listed.

 

The reason why "Cellular tablet sales are going up with the quickness" is because companies such as Sprint are giving away budget tablets at budget prices. This does not show there is a large trend in people using said data on their tablet over Wi-Fi use. Tablet customer's average 1GB of data per month. Expanding their tablet selection is not giving them an advantage over another carrier. It's a waste of inventory space to have tablets that don't sell just sitting around. They have the most popular tablets, that support their network, for sale. Do you know the inventory history for Sprint tablets? They've had the mass selection and that idea failed. They've recently only kept what sells, not to have a portfolio to say they have one. Believe it or not, they're actually listening to their customers by how said customers use their wallet.

 

I don't take your comments as trolling, I take them for what they are, a recent pattern of anti-Sprint comments that are increasing on the daily. Being an "S4GRU veteran" and/or Premier sponsor means nothing about who you are today and doesn't "protect" you as a member here. There are veteran S4GRU Premier sponsors that came here without a facade, showing they're from another provider and they don't post as much anti-Sprint comments as you have recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying dude. They need them. They have the worst tablet selection. I would get one if they had one worth while.

Maybe you haven't been paying attention but the tablet market has basically peaked, not only that but most consumers who want a tablet will go for the WiFi only version. Sprint has zero incentive to sell WiFi only tablets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a similar topic, I wished Android allowed usb modem adapters then I would just get a Wi-Fi tablet (like the Note 12.2 pro), attached the Sprint usb modem like the Netgear 341 and not worry about having to connect to my phones hotspot (thereby draining my battery). But alas Android does not have that capability. So I am forced to carry more items in my travels. 

Sometimes it is nice to have a device that has access to the network built in. One of my old laptops laying around has the Sprint wLAN that connects to Wimax, so I can't put it in my current laptop and instead have to resort to using either the phones hotspot or the Netgear 771. 

 

Anyway, back on topic. I agree that Sprint has no incentive to sell Wi-Fi only tablets, but I wouldn't mind if they did sell more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realized target is selling the galaxy tab S which is a pretty decent tablet, 8.6", and I think would be a good in between small tablet, and full size tablets like the iPad. Maybe a cellular version could be popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...