Jump to content

Google Hangouts w/Voice (Was Google Voice)


COZisBack

Recommended Posts

After using the integration for a couple weeks I found 2 minor flaws that I hope may get addressed at some point.

 

The first is that mms messages only go to and from the phone. It would be nice if they went to/from all devices just like sms messages.

 

The 2nd is related to phone calls. When on a traditional call, my phone cuts off the screen using a proximity sensor. When on a call through Hangouts, it doesn't cut off the screen and I end up in crazy places with my phone from my cheek hitting the screen. If I remember to hit the power button after placing the call, it cuts off the screen, but I have to remember to do that.

 

Anybody else have any other potential improvements other than what I just thought of?

 

Sent from my Note 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2nd is related to phone calls. When on a traditional call, my phone cuts off the screen using a proximity sensor. When on a call through Hangouts, it doesn't cut off the screen and I end up in crazy places with my phone from my cheek hitting the screen. If I remember to hit the power button after placing the call, it cuts off the screen, but I have to remember to do that.

 

 

When I make calls using Hangouts, the screen turns off just fine using the sensor. Perhaps there's a specific issues that the app is having with your device? Works fine on my Nexus 5 and LG G3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Anyone with GV Lite (voicemail only) having issues recently? My voicemails are suddenly going to the default Sprint system now, and when I try deactivating or reactivating my N5 with the * dialer code provided by GV (that always worked in the past), it says the feature code is not valid.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone with GV Lite (voicemail only) having issues recently? My voicemails are suddenly going to the default Sprint system now, and when I try deactivating or reactivating my N5 with the * dialer code provided by GV (that always worked in the past), it says the feature code is not valid.

 

-Mike

No problems here.

 

I think I see a phone call to a sprint CSR in your future. (Or an online chat session. I think I like those better.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone with GV Lite (voicemail only) having issues recently? My voicemails are suddenly going to the default Sprint system now, and when I try deactivating or reactivating my N5 with the * dialer code provided by GV (that always worked in the past), it says the feature code is not valid.

 

Even with full Google Voice integration, I had month or so this summer when voicemail ended up on my various handsets, not in the Google Voice system.  Fortunately, SMS distribution was never affected -- it functioned properly across all of my handsets and devices.  And, at least as of today, a voicemail I received was through the Google Voice system again.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wish there was a way to have Hangouts only handle the Google Voice voicemail side of the house.  Anytime I've tried to mess with it, Hangouts wants to take over my SMS and MMS side as well.  I don't want to use Handouts for that.  I just want Google Voice for my voicemail.

 

So, I am still sticking with the old Google Voice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wish there was a way to have Hangouts only handle the Google Voice voicemail side of the house. Anytime I've tried to mess with it, Hangouts wants to take over my SMS and MMS side as well. I don't want to use Handouts for that. I just want Google Voice for my voicemail.

 

So, I am still sticking with the old Google Voice.

You should be able to do that. Just change the default SMS app to whatever it is you want to use.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wish there was a way to have Hangouts only handle the Google Voice voicemail side of the house. Anytime I've tried to mess with it, Hangouts wants to take over my SMS and MMS side as well. I don't want to use Handouts for that. I just want Google Voice for my voicemail.

 

So, I am still sticking with the old Google Voice.

Exactly... And that is one of the reasons that I absolutely refuse to initiate Hangouts app, and am clinging to the Google Voice app for as long as it is still working.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be able to do that. Just change the default SMS app to whatever it is you want to use.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

I'm not Google Voice integrated and this is what I do, works great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wish there was a way to have Hangouts only handle the Google Voice voicemail side of the house. Anytime I've tried to mess with it, Hangouts wants to take over my SMS and MMS side as well. I don't want to use Handouts for that. I just want Google Voice for my voicemail.

 

So, I am still sticking with the old Google Voice.

You should be able to do that. Just change the default SMS app to whatever it is you want to use.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

travismheim is right.

 

I have Hangouts installed and use it exactly in this fashion. It only accesses Google Voice voicemail and messages that are sent to the GV phone number. My stock messaging app handles normal messaging.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

travismheim is right.

 

I have Hangouts installed and use it exactly in this fashion. It only accesses Google Voice voicemail and messages that are sent to the GV phone number. My stock messaging app handles normal messaging.

Hm, for some reason the last time I attempted to use it for only Google Voice, Hangouts just kept trying to take over my SMS and was even pushing notifications for SMS.  Maybe I will take a look at it again if Voice is more integrated now.  Just hated Hangouts for SMS.  Blah.

 

Though now Google has Google Messanger, which is everything you like in Hangouts and nothing you don't.  Just a good simple SMS/MMS app.  If it had a dark theme I would still use it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone with GV Lite (voicemail only) having issues recently? My voicemails are suddenly going to the default Sprint system now, and when I try deactivating or reactivating my N5 with the * dialer code provided by GV (that always worked in the past), it says the feature code is not valid.

 

-Mike

 

I'm getting this right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like Google just updated the Hangouts dialer app to use your phone # when dialing outbound calls through Hangouts. This is for non-integrated users. I think it's a step in the right direction. You can choose to not allow this if you prefer your caller ID to still show as unavailable. There's a setting in the Hangouts app for it.

 

This will be great for times that I need to use data and make a phone call.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

My Sprint number is google voice enabled. Google voice number is the only number I use. Hangouts is the only app I use for texting. I love that I can text from my iPad and computer.

 

The problem is that quality of the image sent through hangouts (MMS) is very low resolution. This is can be a big problem when sending images of text. The recipient cannot read what was sent.

 

I know I can use a regular texting app but that would send it with my regular Sprint number since I have SMS disabled in hangouts. Problem is Google voice number is all I use and to have to use my Sprint number would cause confusion.

 

Since Google voice number is all that I use, I was thinking of porting that number to be my main Sprint number. That way all my sent images will be sent by normal texting apps with good quality. Not sure if losing Google voice benefits is worth better MMS images.

 

All my apple friends use iMessage. Sometimes I wonder if all this can be avoided if I just get an iPhone and use iMessages.

 

But getting an iPhone to send better image texts seem a bit drastic for me. There must be a better way to text good images using my Google voice number?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can fully integrated Google Voice with Sprint. No need for two numbers. If you can bring your GV number to Sprint, you can still use GV. I integrated my number with GV, so I have all the benefits, and still send regular MMS.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can fully integrated Google Voice with Sprint. No need for two numbers. If you can bring your GV number to Sprint, you can still use GV. I integrated my number with GV, so I have all the benefits, and still send regular MMS.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Yes, I already have done that. The issue is MMS is very low quality (resolution).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I already have done that. The issue is MMS is very low quality (resolution).

No, what he is saying is you can port your GV number to Sprint, and Sprint has special integration that allows you to use GV while still letting your phone have the actual number (no other carrier besides Fi has this). This means using Google Messenger or Textra still works and sends from the right number. And messages still show up on your computer, etc (albeit outgoing messages sent via textra would not).

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Sprint number is google voice enabled. Google voice number is the only number I use. Hangouts is the only app I use for texting. I love that I can text from my iPad and computer.

 

The problem is that quality of the image sent through hangouts (MMS) is very low resolution. This is can be a big problem when sending images of text. The recipient cannot read what was sent.

 

I know I can use a regular texting app but that would send it with my regular Sprint number since I have SMS disabled in hangouts. Problem is Google voice number is all I use and to have to use my Sprint number would cause confusion.

 

Since Google voice number is all that I use, I was thinking of porting that number to be my main Sprint number. That way all my sent images will be sent by normal texting apps with good quality. Not sure if losing Google voice benefits is worth better MMS images.

 

All my apple friends use iMessage. Sometimes I wonder if all this can be avoided if I just get an iPhone and use iMessages.

 

But getting an iPhone to send better image texts seem a bit drastic for me. There must be a better way to text good images using my Google voice number?

In hangouts next to where you enter text hit the little arrow. You can change between Google voice, hangouts message, and SMS on the fly. I currently have to do this when sending mms to Sprint customers, since I get an error about incorrect country code if I try mms via Google voice to a Sprint user.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, what he is saying is you can port your GV number to Sprint, and Sprint has special integration that allows you to use GV while still letting your phone have the actual number (no other carrier besides Fi has this). This means using Google Messenger or Textra still works and sends from the right number. And messages still show up on your computer, etc (albeit outgoing messages sent via textra would not).

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Ok thanks. I had misunderstood the original statement.

 

Question. I know that after porting my GV# to Sprint, I would be able to use any texting app to send and receive from my phone. And the images would look good. But would I be able to use the hangout app on the iPad to send and receive sms?

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok thanks. I had misunderstood the original statement.

 

Question. I know that after porting my GV# to Sprint, I would be able to use any texting app to send and receive from my phone. And the images would look good. But would I be able to use the hangout app on the iPad to send and receive sms?

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

 

Yes (but not MMS) just like you can from your PC

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok thanks. I had misunderstood the original statement.

 

Question. I know that after porting my GV# to Sprint, I would be able to use any texting app to send and receive from my phone. And the images would look good. But would I be able to use the hangout app on the iPad to send and receive sms?

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

 

Yes, every GV feature is still available. And in addition, you can use regular texting apps if you want, and those messages still appear in your hangouts/GV app. MMS messages sent via a regular texting app of course won't be in your GV history since they will be sent through the Sprint network. 

 

Thanks to Travis for clarifying my earlier statement. My Sprint number is my Google Voice number, they are one in the same.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to all who responded. Been thinking about doing this for a while.

 

Unlocked my Google voice number. Paid $3. Called Sprint to port number over. Was told transfer would be complete by 3pm tomorrow. Hope there are no issues.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to all who responded. Been thinking about doing this for a while.

 

Unlocked my Google voice number. Paid $3. Called Sprint to port number over. Was told transfer would be complete by 3pm tomorrow. Hope there are no issues.

 

Google Voice integration on Sprint is a thing of beauty.  Besides MMS, maybe HD Voice, almost nothing is lacking.  The seamless ability to send/receive SMS via SMS or data on the activated handset and to send/receive SMS via data on all connected devices -- secondary handsets, tablets, laptops -- to/from a single phone number is convenience incarnate.  That Sprint has this capability while other operators do not is a surprisingly overlooked advantage.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...