Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

So variances don't matter then... 

 

attachicon.gifScreenshot from 2015-04-09 15:07:51.png

 

T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon all fall within each other's margins of error, so there's no clear speed winner here, hence the 3-way tie.  You could test all the networks again within a week and it could swing back to T-Mobile or Verizon recording the fastest median.

 

Hey, they won!  Get over it.  You're pissing me off, pal.  This is not one speed test.  It's thousands.  And a full meg difference in download is a clear winner in download.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, jackass,  They won!  Get over it.  You're pissing me off, pal.  This is not one speed test.  It's thousands.  And a full meg difference in download is a clear winner in download.

Well not according to root it isn't.

 

I rest my case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not according to root it isn't.

 

I rest my case.

 

Root shows that Sprint won in download.  They only show Tmo tied in overall data speed when counting upload speeds as part of the equation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This RootMetrics bickering needs to stop.  In the immortal words of that cracked out prophet...

 

 

Think of the older people and the kids, please.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So variances don't matter then... 

 

attachicon.gifScreenshot from 2015-04-09 15:07:51.png

 

T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon all fall within each other's margins of error, so there's no clear speed winner here, hence the 3-way tie.  You could test all the networks again within a week and it could swing back to T-Mobile or Verizon recording the fastest median.

Yes and no. I'd tend to think the one that has the 1 mb/s greater median download with a 20% smaller 95% confidence interval likely has the faster download speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So variances don't matter then... 

 

attachicon.gifScreenshot from 2015-04-09 15:07:51.png

 

T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon all fall within each other's margins of error, so there's no clear speed winner here, hence the 3-way tie.  You could test all the networks again within a week and it could swing back to T-Mobile or Verizon recording the fastest median.

Yes and no. I'd tend to think the one that has the 1 mb/s greater median download with a 20% smaller 95% confidence interval likely has the faster download speed.

 

And I would say that over 25,000 tests conducted across greater than 1100 miles driven would be enough to invoke the Law of large numbers.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers

 

The variance is interesting for standard deviation.  But it should not affect the median or average.  Run the same tests again next week, and I would expect notably similar results.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The variance is interesting for standard deviation.  But it should not affect the median or average.  Run the same tests again next week, and I would expect notably similar results.

 

AJ

That is more or less what I was trying to say, not as well as you put it. I don't see how invoking variance helps his argument here. They're using median, a measure already designed to reduce the effects of variance. Added to that they're giving you 95% CI or error bars. Sprint's is approximately 20% smaller than T-Mobile. On both counts 1) the median d/l being about 1 mb/s higher and 2) standard deviation for Sprint's results being smaller, Sprint's download speeds are statistically significantly better. And yes, with the large sample size, similar results should be expected if the experiment was repeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The variance is interesting for standard deviation.  But it should not affect the median or average.  Run the same tests again next week, and I would expect notably similar results.

 

AJ

 

 

Variance matters when you're trying to apply the statistics to a real life decision; for example if you need consistent speeds more than fast peak speeds, that might be something to consider. But you've also got to consider the circumstances as well if you want to apply statistics to a real-world experience. With Sprint still finishing up its network vision upgrades I'd expect to see more variance in it's performance. If we were to run the same tests again next week I'd expect similar results; next month or next quarter Its I'd expect better overall results with less variance. That would be consistent with the trend of the results we've seen over the last year or so, and with the fact that we know that network improvements are ongoing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was at the Duck Commander 500 last night. -98dBm band 41 and it seemed over capacity. Couldn't get web pages to load or Hangouts to send.

 

No idea if they had COWs or anything to supplement capacity, but it seems that they should put extra effort into events that carry the Sprint branding.

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was at the Duck Commander 500 last night. -98dBm band 41 and it seemed over capacity. Couldn't get web pages to load or Hangouts to send.

 

No idea if they had COWs or anything to supplement capacity, but it seems that they should put extra effort into events that carry the Sprint branding.

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Sadly the advertising department and deployment department probably don't talk as much as they should. They might have thought that the existing towers would be more than enough capacity for the event, or just not thought about it at all.

 

But I agree that they should make sure that they conver all major events better (especially if they're a sponsor) because customers will remember a bad experience like you're describing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have sprint started deployment spark cells (Band 41 small cells)? I know they stated back in December that small cells will play a huge role for 2015 but I don't think we heard anything yet...

 

Only in FITs for testing purposes. Mass deployments of small cells have not begun yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They definitely need small cells along the piers in Frisco ca data stinks. Voice and text is perfect

Really? I seem to recall that LTE (Band25) was good enough for web browsing and Facebook last time I was walking though the piers.

 

Are you using a triband device?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I seem to recall that LTE (Band25) was good enough for web browsing and Facebook last time I was walking though the piers.

 

Are you using a triband device?

Yeah it's a triband.

It's just inside I don't get any lte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Also noticed 2x the upload speeds during 2XCA testing, good to see that as well.

 

Yeah no. There are no carrier aggregating of uplink. 

 

No existing UE will have that capability until later this year or next year and will most likely be included with the 3xCA devices. All CA certified devices are specifically only for downlink CA and no other LTE advance technologies. 

 

The PCC will provide the downlink and uplink and the SCC will provide downlink to be aggregated. Uplink on SCC is unused. 

 

See: 

 

mXuK3tz.png

 

Multiple the theoretical max download speeds of a 20 mhz carrier by 2 and you get the theoretical maximum of 2xB41 carrier aggregation downlink speeds. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah no. There are no carrier aggregating of uplink. 

 

No existing UE will have that capability until later this year or next year and will most likely be included with the 3xCA devices. All CA certified devices are specifically only for downlink CA and no other LTE advance technologies. 

 

The PCC will provide the downlink and uplink and the SCC will provide downlink to be aggregated. Uplink on SCC is unused. 

 

See: 

 

 

 

Multiple the theoretical max download speeds of a 20 mhz carrier by 2 and you get the theoretical maximum of 2xB41 carrier aggregation downlink speeds.

So its safe to say its device limited and technically possible to CA the uplink.

 

I saw it on signal research testing(page 11on PDF), but it looks like it came from some type of software tool that they use to test cellular tech and not the Samsung note edge device they used as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So its safe to say its device limited and technically possible to CA the uplink.

 

I saw it on signal research testing(page 11on PDF), but it looks like it came from some type of software tool that they use to test cellular tech and not the Samsung note edge device they used as well.

 

Whatever tools they have does not represent what commercialy available devices are capable of. Uplink CA will be coming in later releases. 

 

It is a good indicator of what future performance increases will be when the devices that are capable of it are released along with it being enabled on the network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever tools they have does not represent what commercialy available devices are capable of. Uplink CA will be coming in later releases. 

 

It is a good indicator of what future performance increases will be when the devices that are capable of it are released along with it being enabled on the network.

Definitely makes more sense on this thread, thx Tim.

 

BTW probably should move this one as well..

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6319-marcelo-claure-town-hall-meetings-new-family-share-pack-plan-unlimited-individual-plan-discussion-thread/?p=421755

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Yeah no. There are no carrier aggregating of uplink. 

 

No existing UE will have that capability until later this year or next year and will most likely be included with the 3xCA devices. All CA certified devices are specifically only for downlink CA and no other LTE advance technologies. 

 

The PCC will provide the downlink and uplink and the SCC will provide downlink to be aggregated. Uplink on SCC is unused. 

 

See: 

 

mXuK3tz.png

 

Multiple the theoretical max download speeds of a 20 mhz carrier by 2 and you get the theoretical maximum of 2xB41 carrier aggregation downlink speeds. 

 

 

Why wouldn't it aggregate uplink in TDD configuration? The same spectrum is being used in time slots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't it aggregate uplink in TDD configuration? The same spectrum is being used in time slots.

UE and RAN limitation. Device makers need to add another transmitting radio to transmit another uplink stream back to the towers to take advantage of the sccs uplink.

 

In addition to compatible devices Sprint and vendors need to push LTE rel 11/12 software that actually enables uplink CA. Not expected til next year as they only just began pushing some major LTE rel 10 software like B41 2xCA only just recently. 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...