Jump to content

Softbank - New Sprint - Discussion


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

 

My favorite part is the me part.   ;)

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite part is the me part.   ;)

It's like Marcelo has been reading this forum, and took the advice you posted a while back with all the bullet points outlining what sprint should do next. So far it's done 2 of those bullets, if I remember correctly. Increase the priority of b41, and accelerate and deploy b26 immediately! Next is backhaul to all remaining sites, and more. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like Marcelo has been reading this forum, and took the advice you posted a while back with all the bullet points outlining what sprint should do next. So far it's done 2 of those bullets, if I remember correctly. Increase the priority of b41, and accelerate and deploy b26 immediately! Next is backhaul to all remaining sites, and more. 

 

Hey, I'd love it if he was.  And if he is, I'm willing to run your network deployment teams, Marcelo.  It's what I do in another industry.  Just sayin'.   :wavey: 

 

Robert

 

P.S. Marcelo, please make a S4GRU donation on your next visit.  Our funds are getting tight.  :)

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they will get rid of the internet backbone business...is that one of the business lines they will get rid of?

I think that would be a mistake. Other major national and international carriers are moving towards vertical consolidation with wireless, wireline/cable and content providers. If anything, Sprint should look to combining with Centurylink/L3C, etc.(whoever has minimum overlap with Sprint) or one of the cable companies.

 

If you want to be a big player, you have to play big games.

 

Edit: Above is in addition to acquiring US Cellular and other rural roaming partners.

Edited by CaptainSlow
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this may not be the best thread to post this, but any guesses as to which Tier-1, and now non-Tier-1, carrier is pursuing FreedomPop?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/freedompop-confirms-ma-talks-second-telecom-company/2014-09-12

Reading the article, the Teir-1 carrier sounds like T-Mobile.

 

As for the non-Teir -1 carrier, I have no idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading the article, the Teir-1 carrier sounds like T-Mobile.

 

As for the non-Teir -1 carrier, I have no idea

Any reason why you think the Tier-1 carrier is T-Mobile and not Sprint, or one of the duopoly? The CEO mentioned a 9-figure valuation - that's at least a billion dollars. Wonder if T-Mobile would be willing to spend that much on acquisitions instead of on spectrum and rural LTE upgrades. Maybe just a controlling stake.

 

I'm more curious about the other telecom company, seeing how he didn't say "carrier". Who would see FreedomPop's business model as central to their growth? Tracfone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any reason why you think the Tier-1 carrier is T-Mobile and not Sprint, or one of the duopoly? The CEO mentioned a 9-figure valuation - that's at least a billion dollars. Wonder if T-Mobile would be willing to spend that much on acquisitions instead of on spectrum and rural LTE upgrades. Maybe just a controlling stake.

 

I'm more curious about the other telecom company, seeing how he didn't say "carrier". Who would see FreedomPop's business model as central to their growth? Tracfone?

I could {and probably am}, completely wrong, but just the comments by the CEO sounded like he was referring to T-Mobile.

 

I actually hope that you are right, that it is Sprint. I would love to see Sprint acquire FreedomPop and US Cellular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping for the opposite.

 

FreedomPop seems way overvalued. It's an expensive distraction.

 

Have Sprint use it's money for new cell sites, Band 41, and purchasing US Cellular, and things of that nature.

 

Let AT&T or Verizon waste money buying another MVNO.

 

Disclaimer: I am long on Sprint, but only by a trivial amount.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Interesting.... Son said he wanted to dominate the world...

America Movil contacts AT&T, Softbank on bids for assets : Bloomberg

http://ca.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idCAKBN0HA20G20140915

 

 

 

It may be useful, but I'd rather see $17 Billion spent on buying smaller carriers in the U.S. to boost coverage. I care more about domestic coverage than international.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may be useful, but I'd rather see $17 Billion spent on buying smaller carriers in the U.S. to boost coverage. I care more about domestic coverage than international.

Yes, Yes.  Why invest in the cesspool called Mexico????   Who needs that?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping for the opposite.

 

FreedomPop seems way overvalued. It's an expensive distraction.

 

Have Sprint use it's money for new cell sites, Band 41, and purchasing US Cellular, and things of that nature.

 

Let AT&T or Verizon waste money buying another MVNO.

 

Disclaimer: I am long on Sprint, but only by a trivial amount.

Yeah, still not sure why everyone values Freedompop so high. They offer service to the most subprime consumerbase possible, don't they? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Yes.  Why invest in the cesspool called Mexico????   Who needs that?

 

Developing, non-mature market with millions of potential customers, plus opportunities for a US carrier to create some plans that could potentially attract millions of Mexican-American customers away from non-Sprint MVNOs with robust cross-border roaming and/or family plans at a better value proposition.

 

Carlos Slim made his billions off his dominant position in Mexican telecoms; a savvy businessman like Son could come in, make millions, and help out his US property at the same time. There's far more synergy for a Sprint hookup with América Móvil's divested assets than there is for Sprint-Softbank from a pure crossover market perspective (outside of the Japanese tourist market in Hawaii, there's just no mass market for crossover services, while millions of people cross the US-Mexican border weekly).

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This must have been one those "nice to haves" that Claure was mentioning last week. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider the corporate jet fleet that Marcelo said he got rid of as a 'nice to have'.

For a data-driven future, I'd want to have owner's economics on the underlying pipes. Just recently I read about Sprint and Softbank being out there acquiring business customers in Japan to leverage Sprint's global Tier-1 backbone, something Softbank couldn't do on its own in the past.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...