Jump to content

Softbank - New Sprint - Discussion


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one who thinks of Pirate Excrement whenever he sees ARPU?  (say it aloud)

 

:lol:

 

Robert

So true!

 

ARPU means very little without ACPU as well. If you can grow Pirate Poop without growing your ACPU as much then you are golden, if you grow ARPU but your ACPU rises faster for a prolonged period then you are doing something wrong. 

 

Sprint fy2013 Post paid branded arpu = 64.07, tmobile = 50.70

churn, sprint post paid branded = 1.93% tmo = 1.7% 

 

So Sprint makes more money per sub (probably a mix of less discounting and higher package sells rather than like for like value, i.e. sprint customers buy higher packages rather than sprint being more expensive for the same thing). The churn difference, in favour of tmobile is likely to do with Sprint taking a knock for NV not being completed yet and Legererers whoring his network into the ground offering unsustainable packages (as we have seen with the recent price increase) just to fluff the figures and make a buyout pay more plus he will hit higher incentive payouts. Sprint is investing heavily and is doing ok subscriber wise, once they can slow down on the capex they can fight harder financially for subs and have a network that keeps them. Plus when there is disruption in the market (and 2013 has been disruptive with the pricing shakeups) there will be people wandering between companies. 

 

There is always a fair degree of churn in the cellular market, it's a fairly competitive market and whilst Sprint's is a little high tmobiles has been far higher in recent years. As a comparison, I worked for a cable company in Europe, we did landlines, cellular, cable tv and internet, our voluntary churn was usually circa 2% and involuntary was a little lower around 1.8%, adding cellular into the mix dropped both by about .3%, the recession actually dropped both down close to 1%, People actually made sure they paid their bill because it was cheaper than going out to party which they couldn't afford due to the recession. Churn is important, but theres usually a hell of a lot of things affecting it some of which you don't even think possible. Every iphone release quarter our invol churn went up by a noticeable bump as halfwits decided not to pay their cable bill so they could afford the latest iphone bill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has been dead for too long. Resurrection time. Another one bites the dust.

 

I feel like Masa is quickly transforming into George R.R Martin. http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-iyad-tarazi-leaves-company-network-team-restructuring/2014-03-25

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically, from an LTE standpoint they don't run any of the same bands, but given how many bands current and future phones are capable of, that shouldn't be any technical problem. But it would be a logistical problem of getting everyone the new phones with all five bands.

 

This exactly, the Nexus 5 is a perfect example.  It supports all major US carriers except VZW.  There is no reason a combined company cannot adopt this approach with all new phones going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk is cheap get the network done already.

 

Who's talking?  I didn't see any talking.  Just firing.  As if Sprint can stop the press from reporting it.  Your comment makes no sense in context.  

 

You are seeing the symptom of Masa not accepting talking anymore, only results.  You're just complaining in negative platitudes.

 

Robert

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone even bother to read a few posts up before posting a link? We were already discussing the passing of Tarazi.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I laughed so hard.

After a time away from the site I went through and reread the entire thread. That's just me though. I'm just curious to see where Masa continues to take it, and how many more people leave the company.

 

-Adam-

Sent from my LG-LS980.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow - SoftBank is cleaning house. CEO stepping down http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=3705444Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Unless I'm missing something, like a joke or what-not, you do realize that that article was written in 2007, right?

 

-Anthony

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those interested, Masa Son will be speaking at the CCA event tomorrow and it'll be live streamed:

 

https://twitter.com/masason/status/448787292493062144

 

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
    • https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/05/att-announces-7-monthly-add-on-fee-for-turbo-5g-speeds/ Hopefully we don't ever see T-Mobile do something like this. Based on how I was treated with my Credit Limit, it's definitely not the same company it was before the merger, and it's entirely possible they'd try it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...