Jump to content

Sprint/Clearwire Acquisition Discussion (Formerly: Dish offer to acquire Clearwire for $4.40 per share in cash.)


bucdenny

Recommended Posts

The writing is on the wall.  SoftBank-Sprint-Clearwire will sail through with no required divestment of spectrum.  Following the T-Mobile-MetroPCS link up that got a free pass on its mucho PCS spectrum, this comes as no surprise.  The current FCC seems willing to let the underdogs amass big bandwidth to take on the duopoly.

 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/report-fcc-wont-force-sprint-clearwire-give-spectrum-part-mergers/2013-06-28

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, time to get serious. What does Sprint do with all the spectrum? Yes, they will use it in a hotspot fashion in NYC, SF, a few downtowns and malls and stadiums. Fine, BFD! What about the rest of us, what benfit do we get out of all of this? How does Sprint monetize it? Do they engage with the cable cos in deploying combined WiFi/2.5GHz strand mounted DAS? I want to hear the plans damn it!

 

For me, the big benefit of Softbank's acquisition is the increased money to solidify the network using NV and the 800SMR spectrum. Why did they expend so much energy and money going after Clearwire? What's the end game?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, time to get serious. What does Sprint do with all the spectrum? Yes, they will use it in a hotspot fashion in NYC, SF, a few downtowns and malls and stadiums. Fine, BFD! What about the rest of us, what benfit do we get out of all of this?

 

Send in the "wambulance."  Honestly, this sounds very similar to the complaints that some of our more rural folk make about Sprint not using its large PCS 1900 MHz spectrum holdings to build out their potentially unprofitable areas.

 

Rest assured, I will have a more mature, well reasoned response later today.  But, with such an urgent situation, I had to get the "wambulance" out there right away.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Send in the "wambulance."  Honestly, this sounds very similar to the complaints that some of our more rural folk make about Sprint not using its large PCS 1900 MHz spectrum holdings to build out their potentially unprofitable areas.

 

Rest assured, I will have a more mature, well reasoned response later today.  But, with such an urgent situation, I had to get the "wambulance" out there right away.

 

AJ

 

Thanks, AJ. You're a true friend :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they have to cover 30% of the POPs in each license area with something, and considering that Softbank has committed to pull all the Huawei equipment Clearwire has installed (along with the need for cost reduction by eliminating leases and backhaul to locations where there's Clearwire equipment but no Sprint equipment), that probably means a lot of LTE deployment on protection sites for starters.  And when Sprint climbs towers to pull down the dead PCS-only panels they might as well put up a 2500 panel + RRU at the same time, at least in the urban/suburban areas where customer density justifies it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Within 3 weeks from the merger close, I expect Sprint permits to start showing up in Vegas detailing 6 panels, 3 being Network Vision permits, and the other 3 being Newer TD-LTE panels.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Antennas... not panels... 

 

From what I understand, clearwire is reusing their old antennas. Don't expect TD-LTE applications for several months until Sprint and CW sort out their strategies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Within 3 weeks from the merger close, I expect Sprint permits to start showing up in Vegas detailing 6 panels, 3 being Network Vision permits, and the other 3 being Newer TD-LTE panels.

 

My representative, Wayne Campbell, will release my statement on the matter:

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh god, I read that yesterday and I wanted to throw my phone in disgust. I can't believe they still let her write for the site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Largely irrelevant concession speech from Crest:

 

 

Big shareholder Crest ends battle with Sprint over Clearwire


July 3 | Wed Jul 3, 2013 8:18am EDT

(Reuters) - Crest Financial, which owns a big stake in Clearwire Corp, said on Wednesday it is backing Sprint Nextel Corp's purchase of the rest of Clearwire, ending a protracted and noisy fight over the wireless service provider.

Crest, which hold 8 percent of Clearwire, wrote in a letter to Clearwire shareholders that it intended to vote in favor of the merger after Sprint raised its offer to $5 per Clearwire share from $2.97.

"We are proud of our campaign and stand by our analysis," Crest said in the letter.

"At the same time, with this favorable resolution, we withdraw any statements made in the heat of battle that may be construed as disparaging to Clearwire, Sprint, their directors and officers, or any other participants in this hard-fought contest."

Clearwire was in the middle of a tug-of-war ever since Sprint, its majority shareholder, offered to buy out the rest of the company.

Charlie Ergen, founder and chairman of Dish Network Corp , the satellite television provider, made a counterbid for a minority position in Clearwire because of it owned valuable communications spectrum.

Several minority shareholders launched a boisterous campaign against Sprint, trying to get the company to increase its offer. Dish bowed out after Sprint trumped its bid of $4.40 per share.

Sprint itself was the subject of a takeover battle between Japan's SoftBank's Corp and Dish. Softbank eventually won that bidding war.

 

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/03/clearwire-crest-idUSL2N0F90GV20130703?feedType=RSS&feedName=mergersNews&rpc=43

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Withdraw any statements made in the heat of battle"? Hmm. Sounds like someone at Crest may be paranoid about Sprint seeking damages from them as well, especially if they had given Dish written guarantee that Crest would violate the charter and meet Dish's terms

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Withdraw any statements made in the heat of battle"? Hmm. Sounds like someone at Crest may be paranoid about Sprint seeking damages from them as well, especially if they had given Dish written guarantee that Crest would violate the charter and meet Dish's terms

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

Lol, gotta love it. Someone's gonna get nailed to the wall for this one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well dish's offers were all planned to fail. No way sprint or clearwire could let a minority shareholder have veto power over the majority. Looks like a clear case of stock price manipulation by crest and dish.

 

Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the KC Biz Journal, "Sprint will reimburse Crest Financial and affiliated shareholders as much as $2.5 million for costs associated with its campaign to persuade Clearwire shareholders to reject Sprint’s proposal." I wonder if that $2.5 million was the final nail needed to buy Crest's vote.

 

http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2013/07/03/sprint-strikes-deal-with-one-of.html

Edited by linhpham2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Business is all about cost/benefit analysis. It is better to sail into approval paying this $2.5M to Crest than it is to try a legal fight to suggest market manipulation. Other shareholders and more importantly bondholders would be nervous to invest in Sprint in the future if they went after Crest. This is the right course of action. Just get the deal done!

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update from The Hill: The FCC vote is 3-0 in favor (instead of just 2-1). No mention if any spectrum sell-off is required. From the article: "The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously on Wednesday to approve SoftBank's purchase of Sprint...No official announcement has been made yet. Republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai negotiated to remove wording in the final order related to the way the FCC calculates spectrum holdings."

 

Kinda surprised that it was a unanimous vote. Also surprised that the FCC commissioners were still working. I thought the entire government was on a Fourth of July vacation for the week -- not just Congress.

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/309237--softbank-wins-fcc-approval-to-buy-sprint

Edited by linhpham2
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...