Jump to content

Sprint/Clearwire Acquisition Discussion (Formerly: Dish offer to acquire Clearwire for $4.40 per share in cash.)


bucdenny

Recommended Posts

Sprint shareholders vote on June 12. Clearwire shareholders vote on June 13, barring anymore distractions.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just remember that the Dish offer is opposed not only by Sprint but by the other strategic investors, namely cable providers. Not only do they compete against Dish in the broadcast video arena, but if the Dish bid goes through, they will compete against them in the fixed broadband, video on demand and OTT video. They have a lot to lose if Dish prevails.

 

Hate to quote myself, but wanted to expand my thought further. Could the cable providers be in cahoots with Softbank/Sprint to offer OTT video to their subscribers over Clearwire spectrum? I see no other reason for Sprint to be holding on to that much spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hate to quote myself, but wanted to expand my thought further. Could the cable providers be in cahoots with Softbank/Sprint to offer OTT video to their subscribers over Clearwire spectrum? I see no other reason for Sprint to be holding on to that much spectrum.

It's possible. Not something I've considered before.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to go a bit further, I can see small, strand or pole mounted DAS for Clearwire spectrum along with the WiFi antennas with the actual base station logic in the cloud or at a macrocell site communicating with the DAS over cable fiber. Sprint gets a widely deployed network, cable providers keep the wolf away from the sheep, everybody is happy, except Dish!

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to quote myself, but wanted to expand my thought further. Could the cable providers be in cahoots with Softbank/Sprint to offer OTT video to their subscribers over Clearwire spectrum? I see no other reason for Sprint to be holding on to that much spectrum.

I would not be surprised. Here in Austin Time Warner is rolling out free Wifi for subscribers to combat the pull of Google Fiber. It would make sense if Comcast and TW wanted to offer mobile TV as a similar way to fend off Google or other competitors. I know that these companies already offer rebranded Clear internet in some markets as it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did. I believe they stopped offering Clearwire service after they sold their AWS spectrum to VZW.

You hit the nail on the head.

 

When SpectrumCo sold their AWS spectrum to VZW, they signed some form of non-compete clause, if I'm not mistaken. That's part of the reason why Cox now offers a triple-play bundle with a Verizon mobile device. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint and Dan Hesse also need to get the SEC involved on Crest. A hedge fund with 0 skeletons in their closet? I'd love to see that. Sprint melting Crest into a million pieces of molten rubbish would send a pretty clear message to the world.

 

At this point, I don't care if Sprint destroys Crest to the point where careers and lives go down the drain. Frankly, that's what Crest deserves.

Damn.  Tell us how you really feel.  LOL....but I actually agree with you 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Ergen is setting himself up to litigate again. Nothing new for that assclown. Sprint has to get ready for the lawsuit, or go on the aggressive themselves. I advocate for the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I guess we will see who is telling the truth.  I am on the biased side, but I believe Sprint more than Dish, especially with Dish's predatory history. Also their comment against Comcast is BS. Comcast has those rights, because it is in the EHA, which was the point Sprint was mentioning. You need to amend the EHA to include Dish for them to have those rights. Dish would need 66 2/3 vote to amend the EHA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok! That's it! Where does Charlie live? And who wants to go with me with some elephant tranquilizers? I've just about enough from that clown! :mad::devil::sly::bang:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is only going to bang his drum louder and harder the closer we get to time for Sprint + SB vote. I wonder what's next from this bipolar skitzoid.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

This could be the real reason why Sprint is thinking about extending the Softbank-Sprint vote. If Sprint swallows up Clearwire, then it is impossible for Dish to spas on Clearwire if the Softbank deal become the clearly preferred offer. I truly believe Dish's 4.40 offer was a response to CFIUS approving Softbank's ability to buy Sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really begaining to loath dish. From what I can see the only reason they made this offer is to tie up sprint network plans until sprint agrees to Build dish's network on dish's terms. I thought that was blackmail, but I guess companies can get away with that kind of behavior. I will never use a dish product or service even if they gain control of sprint I so loath them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really begaining to loath dish. From what I can see the only reason they made this offer is to tie up sprint network plans until sprint agrees to Build dish's network on dish's terms. I thought that was blackmail, but I guess companies can get away with that kind of behavior. I will never use a dish product or service even if they gain control of sprint I so loath them.

 

 

If dish does get control over sprint then I'm switching. Maybe just maybe I might hold onto sprint to see what their plans are with sprint's network and plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!

 

Sent from my iPhone5 using Tapatalk 2

Edited by juant87
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dish/Charlie's released a press release refuting Sprint's claims regarding their offer for Clearwire shares now:

 

http://dish.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=769179

 

 

So Ergen is setting himself up to litigate again. Nothing new for that assclown. Sprint has to get ready for the lawsuit, or go on the aggressive themselves. I advocate for the latter.

 

Preparing for lawsuit hell, NV to stall, and SoftBank to back out :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Charlie is trying to intimidate SoftBank in giving up. This is all a rouse and a charade to scare Masayoshi Son off the playground. He's trying to give the message that Sprint and Clearwire aren't worth fighting for. Mr. Son is much smarter than Charlie, I think it will backfire. Charlie is just an obnoxious bully, and he's doubling down.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Charlie is trying to intimidate SoftBank in giving up. This is all a rouse and a charade to scare Masayoshi Son off the playground. He's trying to give the message that Sprint and Clearwire aren't worth fighting for. Mr. Son is much smarter than Charlie, I think it will backfire. Charlie is just an obnoxious bully, and he's doubling down.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Jack Grubman on CNBC put it best,  " Charlie Ergen might be a great poker player, but he has a crappy hand and all his cards are facing up". I really do not believe Masayoshi Son will back down. Economic scale never goes away, plus 2.6Ghz spectrum may be the key to international LTE roaming and Sprint would have the monopoly on it. Those two factors could fund the deal on their own.  If Sprint and Softbank were to actually take market shares from ATT or Verizon, they could become the largest purchaser of smartphones. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack Grubman on CNBC put it best,  " Charlie Ergen might be a great poker player, but he has a crappy hand and all his cards are facing up".

 

Lol!  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...