Jump to content

All Sprint acquisition discussion (was "Japan's Softbank in talks for $12.8 bln Sprint stake")


kckid

Recommended Posts

I would love to see clear become/remain a wholesale access messiah to mvno's and regionals... it goes against everything Ergen believes in and is good for the consumer

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

I agree it would be good, but Clearwire has said several times that the wholesale route hasn't worked out very well for them.  As a standalone network, they aren't set up well for anything more than fixed usage due to the holes in coverage in a large part of their footprint, and most of the other networks that might entertain wholesale coverage would need an overlay to fill in those spots.

 

The role that clearwire will play in network vision (offload the lower bands) is exactly what they've been pitching to other potential customers, but have largely been shunned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Softbank has the experience and seems confident that Clear's spectrum can be put to good use. The excess capacity provided by proper deployment of clear's assets will far exceed sprint's userbase. Regardless of what its called, we are going to see more mvno's and regional agreements than ever, possibly utilizing pcs in conjunction with brs/ebs , possibly a regional's native voice/data with brs/ebs only. And why not?

 

There is money in this. Clear's financial burden has always been about network capex.

 

There is no good reason any network should have to re-sell access as cheaply as clear has been meagerly able to do (free in some cases). Its lack of profitability directly correlates with its quality. A better deployed network with the same specteum WILL be more profitable. So excited to have Son in at the table!!!!

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Softbank has the experience and seems confident that Clear's spectrum can be put to good use. The excess capacity provided by proper deployment of clear's assets will far exceed sprint's userbase. Regardless of what its called, we are going to see more mvno's and regional agreements than ever, possibly utilizing pcs in conjunction with brs/ebs , possibly a regional's native voice/data with brs/ebs only. And why not?

 

There is money in this. Clear's financial burden has always been about network capex.

 

There is no good reason any network should have to re-sell access as cheaply as clear has been meagerly able to do (free in some cases). Its lack of profitability directly correlates with its quality. A better deployed network with the same specteum WILL be more profitable. So excited to have Son in at the table!!!!

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

If it's used for mobile broadband then they need to just use it for hotspot duty or it becomes very expensive to deploy. The only way to have it done cheaply is in conjunction with the cable cos as strand mounted DAS, with the basestation logic back at the regular basestation. Again, that's a hell of a lot of bandwidth and they better have good uses for all that bandwidth.

 

I like Dish's use for Clearwire's spectrum better because they will use it for fixed broadband and OTT video. It's probably why the cable cos that still own Clearwire spectrum will vote as a block with Sprint and against Dish. After all, Dish is a video competitor and may become a fixed broadband competitor as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-11/dish-sprint-talks-said-to-falter-in-part-over-breakup-fee-issue.html?cmpid=yhoo

 

 

Dish-Sprint Talks Said to Falter in Part Over Breakup-Fee Issue
By Serena Saitto - Jun 11, 2013 9:46 AM GMT-0700

Dish Network Corp. (DISH)’s merger talks with Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) faltered in part over Sprint demanding a $3 billion breakup fee in case the deal didn’t win regulatory approval, according to two people familiar with the discussions.

Dish had proposed a $1 billion termination fee instead, said one of the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private. Sprint announced yesterday that Dish hadn’t produced an “actionable” bid and moved instead to endorse a sweetened, $21.6 billion offer from SoftBank Corp. (9984), which originally agreed to acquire the carrier in October.


Sprint Nextel Corp. announced yesterday that Dish Network Corp. hadn’t produced an “actionable” bid and moved instead to endorse a sweetened, $21.6 billion offer from SoftBank Corp., which originally agreed to acquire the carrier in October


To contact the reporter on this story: Serena Saitto in New York at ssaitto@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Nick Turner at nturner7@bloomberg.net; Jeffrey McCracken at jmccracken3@bloomberg.net; Michael Tighe at mtighe4@bloomberg.net

 

 

Pretty smart. They don't want to hook up with Dish so they put a poison pill in the agreement that they know Dish won't agree to and then refuse to budge on it. I still can't believe that AT&T actually allowed that exorbitant break up fee with T-Mobile to be put into their merger agreement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the new Softbank deal sucks. The new deal is $16.6 billion + $5 billion in cash=$21.6 billion for 78% stake. Compare that to the old deal which was $20.1 billion for a 70% stake. 

 

This offer is actually a significantly lower valuation of $27.75 billion now vs $28.88 billion before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id call the 3B absolutely reasonable, not a poison pill. The cost to undo the softbank deal together with the financial cost Sprint would incur if Dish ultimately walked away from them together with the lost opportunity caused by chasing softbank away is easily worth 3 billion

 

Tmo got 4B from ATT and they are smaller than sprint. This is typical Ergen. Once he had softbank out of the picture, his scrooge ways would have set in. I officially retract my opinion about charlie wanting a wireless network. I believe the analysts who declared this a big bluff for Ergen to score a hosting deal were spot on

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the new Softbank deal sucks. The new deal is $16.6 billion + $5 billion in cash=$21.6 billion for 78% stake. Compare that to the old deal which was $20.1 billion for a 70% stake. 

 

This offer is actually a significantly lower valuation of $27.75 billion now vs $28.88 billion before.

 

It's the tradeoff for receiving almost a $1.50 more per share in cold hard cash instead of stock in the "New Sprint". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just seen on a finance channel. Now Sprint is waiting for counter offer from Dish. Is all this to please shareholders pockets while Sprint custys suffer from slow rollout and bad coverage?

 

Network Vision is not a "slow rollout."  It is basically unprecedented in its scope and speed.  As for coverage, that has not changed.  If you were not happy with Sprint coverage prior to Network Vision, then you are guilty of choosing an operator that does not have the coverage you need/desire.

 

AJ

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Network Vision is not a "slow rollout."  It is basically unprecedented in its scope and speed.  As for coverage, that has not changed.  If you were not happy with Sprint coverage prior to Network Vision, then you are guilty of choosing an operator that does not have the coverage you need/desire.

 

AJ

(mildly offtopic but) I'm really starting to think that, in most customer's minds, "slow" actually means "late". And "late" means "I want it now!". They want NV to have started years ago. By some respects, it should have, but that doesn't stop reality.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(mildly offtopic but) I'm really starting to think that, in most customer's minds, "slow" actually means "late". And "late" means "I want it now!".

 

Yes, we have a default video clip for any "I want it now!" folks.  It also includes the correct response to them:  "Can it, you nit!"

 

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id call the 3B absolutely reasonable, not a poison pill. The cost to undo the softbank deal together with the financial cost Sprint would incur if Dish ultimately walked away from them together with the lost opportunity caused by chasing softbank away is easily worth 3 billion

 

Tmo got 4B from ATT and they are smaller than sprint. This is typical Ergen. Once he had softbank out of the picture, his scrooge ways would have set in. I officially retract my opinion about charlie wanting a wireless network. I believe the analysts who declared this a big bluff for Ergen to score a hosting deal were spot on

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

Tmobile got 6 billion actually. 3 billion in cash, 2 billion in spectrum, and an HSPA+ roaming agreement with 1 Billion.   3 Billion is more than reasonable, especially since Sprint would have had to pay 1 billion just to get out of the Softbank deal. 

 
The biggest poison pill now is the Sprint Shareholder rights agreement, which basically states that no company can own more than 17% of Sprint besides Softbank. We will not see Cheapie Charlie try and steal the deal with a tender offer like he is attempting with Clearwire. The new deal also raises the termination fee to 800million, any offer must be fully funded to be considered superior, and finally Dish cannot try and pull a fast one with a last minute bid. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Softbank just raised their offer. It went from 20.1 billion to 21.6 billion and supposedly they won more shareholder approval. In reality it's better for them to merge over dish. They have phone networks knowledge and maybe those who travel to softbank area will get a low roaming charges through some type of agreement. I just want something to happen soon so Sprint can use the money to keep boosting the lte expansion.

 

Sent from the Great Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Dish's endgame is not about Sprint at all, just Clear, To dovetail with Google and Dish's plans?T

The most ever Dish will get is 32% of the company. Enough to cause trouble but no more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So..... the Clearwire Committee is backing up Dish's offer thus delaying the Sprint vote.

 

 I am sooo getting tired of Dish and what is Clearwire thinking. aarrgghh.

This is for Dish's offer on Clearwire I believe (not a WSJ sub) http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-12/clearwire-board-backs-dish-s-bid-over-sprint-s-competing-offer.html not for the Dish offer on Sprint itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That' can be hindsight

 

 

Hindsight is 20/20.  Playing that is like playing Monday morning quarterback.  It is too easy and divorced from reality.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets see

 

5 billion cash infusion or -9 billion cash infusion.

 

Dish has no room to talk. Also I believe the FCC and DOJ are secretly rooting for Softbank. They have made it clear that the wireless market needs a strong 3 possibly 4 to compete against the duopoly.

 

I am surprised that the FCC has taken so long.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...