Jump to content

Sprint LTE Coverage Maps via Sensorly


Recommended Posts

No offense, but it is hard to decipher what you guys are trying to say. Not trying to call anyone out.. we all make typos, especially when using a phone. Just try to take a moment to proofread your post before you hit submit. If you are trying to raise an issue or ask a question, there are many of us who would love to help you out!

 

Just my personal two cents..

 

-Mike

Sry ! Me & Girlfriend took A friend to NJ,this passed sunday since there's no 4G LTE near me. So I thought that maps out are road trip using sensorly as we go down the roads. My girlfriend thought i was having an organism everything that signal check chimed that 4g was available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My said girlfriend thought i was better sex with my phone, then with her while driving down the road. :rolleyes:

I'm pretty sure posting a pic of this one would be violating some rules. Hmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if you guys are seeing this but here's what I sent in yesterday to Sensorly support:

 

"So I looked at the maps on the new Sensorly app version today. I usually look on the Web since the maps look better there. I noticed the areas I mapped almost a week ago are not showing up on the Web app but they show on the website. I tried even turning off the map freshness setting but it still doesn't show up."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah if I use the old app right now all my mapping shows up. Not so much on the new app. I keep the old app on my tablet and the new one on my phone. Maps def look different here in sf.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking again now. Some mapping I did last week shows up on old app. But not new app.

But some tracks that others have done more recently (2 days ago) are showing up in both old and new app. Strange my much older tracks are not showing up in new app.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly is back to using Google Maps again with the newest update. It actually shows my location accurately again and doesn't slow down or freeze when I try scrolling the map.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly is back to using Google Maps again with the newest update. It actually shows my location accurately again and doesn't slow down or freeze when I try scrolling the map.

 

Maybe I'll finally update it on my phone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly is back to using Google Maps again with the newest update. It actually shows my location accurately again and doesn't slow down or freeze when I try scrolling the map.

 

guess I haven't gotten the update yet as the mapping hasn't changed back to Google Maps. Still got that crappy looking, slow loading map 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'digiblur', on 17 Jan 2013 - 4:04 PM, said:snapback.png

One thing I have noticed is Sensorly incorrectly reports roaming coverage as Sprint coverage. Not sure if this is done by design or possible limitation at the time.

Went to an area that I know is roaming and wanted to map where Sprint stopped, I left it on accidentally. And it mapped the roaming coverage. DOH! It looks like Sprint has coverage there now.

Now that I look at things with all the times I am roaming in places, really looking at the Sprint CDMA map means nothing about Sprint's service coverage area since it includes all the other CDMA services as well.

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

It's intentional : it shows where you phone will work. That's what most people are interested in.

 

 

Unfortunately, for me, that is not what I am interested in. I am using BoostMobile and am using the maps to see only Sprint coverage, as I do not get roaming.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...