Jump to content

Sprint LTE Coverage Maps via Sensorly


Recommended Posts

Yeah, OpenSignal is a crowd sourced signal mapper just like Sensorly. I stopped using it and went to Sensorly because it seemed like more users used Sensorly. Unfortunately, the OSM maps in Sensorly are useless, so unless they decided to go back to Google Maps, I am done using it.

I checked it out but the maps showing strong Sprint 4g signal in places where they don't even have a site is troubling. No thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked it out but the maps showing strong Sprint 4g signal in places where they don't even have a site is troubling. No thanks.

I just checked OpenSignal out and in my area it's basically backwards.  There's absolutely nothing mapped around all the 4G towers near me, yet it's showing strong 4G in farmland and highway areas where the towers aren't broadcasting LTE at all.  Half of the mapped 4G is actually in Sprint dead zones for 3G and voice. 

 

EDIT: I should say 1900 MHz dead zones since I haven't been to those areas since 800 went live. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the original as well, the new app may use a non google map, because once your app uses a certain number of hits google starts to charge you

In the beta sensorly thread the developer says google is actually cheaper but that they like that these maps don't have colors so you can see tracks better. I hope their recent silence means they are working to appease the lot of us.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the beta sensorly thread the developer says google is actually cheaper but that they like that these maps don't have colors so you can see tracks better. I hope their recent silence means they are working to appease the lot of us.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

If some people are complaining about not seeing the coverage overlay (not me - I see it just fine), give them the option of decreasing the transparency of the overlay.   With the new maps, you can't see the MAP, which is kind of important.  Even without the coverage overlay, those new maps are hard to use and apparently incomplete/inaccurate. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I refuse to map in Sensorly anymore because it shows me driving in random empty places with no roads, doesn't show roads that I know are there and small towns don't even appear as if they don't exist. Not to mention even on a strong 38 mbps wifi connection, it is painfully slow to navigate the maps. I figure any mapping I do would just be inaccurate and mess up the true coverage area. Plus, any wimax I map might show up as the generic 4G and confuse the LTE maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I refuse to map in Sensorly anymore because it shows me driving in random empty places with no roads, doesn't show roads that I know are there and small towns don't even appear as if they don't exist. Not to mention even on a strong 38 mbps wifi connection, it is painfully slow to navigate the maps. I figure any mapping I do would just be inaccurate and mess up the true coverage area. Plus, any wimax I map might show up as the generic 4G and confuse the LTE maps.

I've never had an issue with viewing/navigating the maps, what browser are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant I tried to give Sensorly a chance with a fast wifi connection instead of over 3G to see if the maps loading slowly was from my end or the app itself, but it was just as slow and unresponsive over wifi to navigate the maps. I hate to say it, but the app is just truly bad now and unfortnately it is mostly do to OSM. It looks like a map program created for kindergarteners  and it's about as useful as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a bunch of LTE 4G showing leading out of Charlotte NC on I77 then down I26 toward I95 then I95 south to Savannah GA that is false (I am guessing someones phone was messed up and said there was LTE when there wasn't)... Anything we can do to fix this on there?  I love to map new sites ASAP but all of I95 from I26 to GA are ruined for me.  I PMed the Sensorly username on here but got no response...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a bunch of LTE 4G showing leading out of Charlotte NC on I77 then down I26 toward I95 then I95 south to Savannah GA that is false (I am guessing someones phone was messed up and said there was LTE when there wasn't)... Anything we can do to fix this on there?  I love to map new sites ASAP but all of I95 from I26 to GA are ruined for me.  I PMed the Sensorly username on here but got no response...

 

I have no idea why you would say that those areas are false...

 

There are sites that have been upgraded to LTE in all of those areas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant I tried to give Sensorly a chance with a fast wifi connection instead of over 3G to see if the maps loading slowly was from my end or the app itself, but it was just as slow and unresponsive over wifi to navigate the maps. I hate to say it, but the app is just truly bad now and unfortnately it is mostly do to OSM. It looks like a map program created for kindergarteners and it's about as useful as such.

As an OSMer myself I'm disappointed in this attitude. Personally I think Sensorly might have chosen a better tileset like Mapquest Open, but ultimately the map itself is as good as the community makes it, and if there's something missing or wrong you can report it or (better yet) help fix it at www.OpenStreetMap.org.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea why you would say that those areas are false...

 

There are sites that have been upgraded to LTE in all of those areas. 

 

It is in areas where there is no LTE at all yet... It digs through parts of Rock Hill SC that have not lit up yet... and makes dark solid purple lines many many miles long through areas that are not even 3G updated yet... Two days after this showed up I carefully drove through that area and reset my connection at times to make sure that there wasn't 20 or 30 sites suddenly opened up to 4G and there was nothing (other than around the 4G site in Hardeeville SC and another one that opened up around 40 miles north of there Yemmessee area)... It is definitely a case of one persons phone on their way to or from FL or GA messing up and reporting a phantom signal...

 

EDIT: The way it mapped it was either actually on 3G or MAYBE on Verizon 4G...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is in areas where there is no LTE at all yet... It digs through parts of Rock Hill SC that have not lit up yet... and makes dark solid purple lines many many miles long through areas that are not even 3G updated yet... Two days after this showed up I carefully drove through that area and reset my connection at times to make sure that there wasn't 20 or 30 sites suddenly opened up to 4G and there was nothing (other than around the 4G site in Hardeeville SC and another one that opened up around 40 miles north of there Yemmessee area)... It is definitely a case of one persons phone on their way to or from FL or GA messing up and reporting a phantom signal...

 

EDIT: The way it mapped it was either actually on 3G or MAYBE on Verizon 4G...

 

It certainly looks like whatever was mapping was reporting a real signal, whether it was Sprint LTE, don't know. The coverage pattern does seem to reflect Sprint site spacing. I doubt there will be a way to erase it now that it's there, other than mapping over it once LTE is live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly looks like whatever was mapping was reporting a real signal, whether it was Sprint LTE, don't know. The coverage pattern does seem to reflect Sprint site spacing. I doubt there will be a way to erase it now that its' there, other than mapping over it once LTE is live.

Yeah, that sucks :(

 

My guess is that the culprit had some kind of custom ROM that reported a 3G signal as a 4G signal.... It really matches up with what I get along that route in 3G... including the small gaps in that persons mapping... but it was definitely not sprint 4G (other than maybe some small amounts in the above cities, around Orangeburg and Columbia maybe)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an OSMer myself I'm disappointed in this attitude. Personally I think Sensorly might have chosen a better tileset like Mapquest Open, but ultimately the map itself is as good as the community makes it, and if there's something missing or wrong you can report it or (better yet) help fix it at www.OpenStreetMap.org.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

It is no dig against anyone who contributes to this map. This is my first run in with OSM, but a program like Sensorly needs a fully complete map to serve as an accurate basis of displaying accurate signal coverage. There are so many missing streets, neighborhoods and towns and the map unfortunately doesn't look very professional. The last nail in the coffin is the fact that with Sensorly, it is so slow at rendering that it is unusable. Maybe it's just me or my Evo 3D just might be too old to use it now. But I no longer use Sensorly because of OSM.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is no dig against anyone who contributes to this map. This is my first run in with OSM, but a program like Sensorly needs a fully complete map to serve as an accurate basis of displaying accurate signal coverage. There are so many missing streets, neighborhoods and towns and the map unfortunately doesn't look very professional. The last nail in the coffin is the fact that with Sensorly, it is so slow at rendering that it is unusable. Maybe it's just me or my Evo 3D just might be too old to use it now. But I no longer use Sensorly because of OSM.

 

Got an update from Sensorly this morning, and they have heard you. They are working to reverse the map changes as well as some other design issues. I will say this, the Sensorly crew has been very responsive, it just takes time to implement the changes. 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is exciting. I miss Sensorly and it left me very conflicted when I decided it was time to retire it, especially since once I get my G2, I was excited to map out LTE in my area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got an update from Sensorly this morning, and they have heard you. They are working to reverse the map changes as well as some other design issues. I will say this, the Sensorly crew has been very responsive, it just takes time to implement the changes. 

 

Thats great to hear.  I tried out OpenSignal and it crashes all the time.  Looking forward to getting the Google Maps back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is in areas where there is no LTE at all yet... It digs through parts of Rock Hill SC that have not lit up yet... and makes dark solid purple lines many many miles long through areas that are not even 3G updated yet... Two days after this showed up I carefully drove through that area and reset my connection at times to make sure that there wasn't 20 or 30 sites suddenly opened up to 4G and there was nothing (other than around the 4G site in Hardeeville SC and another one that opened up around 40 miles north of there Yemmessee area)... It is definitely a case of one persons phone on their way to or from FL or GA messing up and reporting a phantom signal...

 

EDIT: The way it mapped it was either actually on 3G or MAYBE on Verizon 4G...

 

Or someone just drove by when they were testing towers that weren't up when you drove by.  Based on the gaps, I think you can rule out it being Verizon since they don't currently and probably haven't had big gaps there for quite a while like the Sprint map shows.  Verizon also appears to have a weak spot around I-95 and 462, where the map shows dark purple on Sprint.  Sprint has a tower right there (probably testing or not publicly broadcasting 4G), and I assume Verizon does not.

 

For the most part it follows the tower placement of Sprint.  The gap around Walterboro means it wouldn't be 3G unless the mapper turned off sensorly for just that stretch since Sprint has strong 3G around there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or someone just drove by when they were testing towers that weren't up when you drove by.  Based on the gaps, I think you can rule out it being Verizon since they don't currently and probably haven't had big gaps there for quite a while like the Sprint map shows.  Verizon also appears to have a weak spot around I-95 and 462, where the map shows dark purple on Sprint.  Sprint has a tower right there (probably testing or not publicly broadcasting 4G), and I assume Verizon does not.

 

For the most part it follows the tower placement of Sprint.  The gap around Walterboro means it wouldn't be 3G unless the mapper turned off sensorly for just that stretch since Sprint has strong 3G around there.

It just couldn't have been testing, too many miles and too many large stretches between sites... I dropped out of data (3G or 1x) several times and it seems that it was probably a "fake" connection that was actually 3G or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is exciting. I miss Sensorly and it left me very conflicted when I decided it was time to retire it, especially since once I get my G2, I was excited to map out LTE in my area.

 

Meanwhile...

 

Here is the old Sensorly apk from my phone for anyone wanting to downgrade:

 

https://db.tt/tjq6fWRr

 

 

Just download and install the old app over the new one, and map away...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just couldn't have been testing, too many miles and too many large stretches between sites... I dropped out of data (3G or 1x) several times and it seems that it was probably a "fake" connection that was actually 3G or something.

Believe what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...