Jump to content

LG G2 -- the first Sprint tri band LTE handset (was "LG Optimus G2")


Thai

Recommended Posts

You guys are also forgetting that it may be out of Sprint's hands on when it launches, perhaps AT&T and Verizon paid more to have it get released earlier. Now, I'm not saying that's what happened, but it would make sense if that November date is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phonearena.com's review of the device: http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/LG-G2-Review_id3404

 

 

FWIW, they've been talking about they only had a non-US model since the announcement, I didn't see in the article whether it was a domestic carrier model or the one LG gave them.

 

Not to insult you at all zippychance but wow. That is one of the most boilerplate and rushed reviews I have ever seen. Phonearena should be completely ashamed of the battery section

 

"Battery

How is the G2's beefy 3000 mAh battery handling this enormous display? Quite well, actually. The phone can easily last you through a full working day of heavy usage, or about a couple of days of moderate usage. Sure, the device might has some extra thickness to it, but we'd prefer this over a thinner profile, if it means better battery life... especially when the added thickness doesn't make the smartphone more difficult or unpleasant to hold." 

 

I mean, good lord, I could have written that without ever seeing the phone! I guess we will have to wait for TheVerge/Engadget for the review and Anandtech for technical battery stats,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am skeptical about the battery lasting for "a couple of days of moderate usage". But, on the subject of the review, it almost sounds like it was paid for by LG. I am not saying it won't be an awesome phone. I am looking forward to it. My very first cell phone was an LG back when Sprint began their "Vision" campaign with the very first color screen flip phones. I liked that phone and have high hopes for the G2. I just have to see how the LG skinned overlay is in person over stock Android.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are also forgetting that it may be out of Sprint's hands on when it launches, perhaps AT&T and Verizon paid more to have it get released earlier. Now, I'm not saying that's what happened, but it would make sense if that November date is correct.

 

Now that the summer vacation is over, I am working on a belated article for the LG G2 FCC OET authorizations.  Some of the data still seems to be missing, much like with the Optimus G last summer.  So, I am basically betting on a Class II Permissive Change filing down the road.  Similar to last year, that probably pushes the release back to later in the fall.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am skeptical about the battery lasting for "a couple of days of moderate usage".

 

One advantage of the Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974) is that it potentially brings processor, baseband modem, and Wi-Fi all back on one 28 nm process chipset.  Compare that to the HTC One, which has good battery life, but it has separate processor, baseband modem, and Wi-Fi chipsets.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One advantage of the Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974) is that it potentially brings processor, baseband modem, and Wi-Fi all back on one 28 nm process chipset.  Compare that to the HTC One, which has good battery life, but it has separate processor, baseband modem, and Wi-Fi chipsets.

 

AJ

Do we know what Wi-Fi chip the G2 has? I asked when it was announced and basically got "maybe WCN 3680, maybe not".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know what Wi-Fi chip the G2 has? I asked when it was announced and basically got "maybe WCN 3680, maybe not".

 

I am not sure.  Only occasionally do FCC OET filings reveal those sorts of details.  What I can say is that it has 802.11ac specs identical to those of the HTC One and Samsung Galaxy S4.  Plus, it will definitely have processor and cellular baseband modem on the same MSM8974 chipset.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure.  Only occasionally do FCC OET filings reveal those sorts of details.  What I can say is that it has 802.11ac specs identical to those of the HTC One and Samsung Galaxy S4.  Plus, it will definitely have processor and cellular baseband modem on the same MSM8974 chipset.

 

AJ

OK, so are ac specs similar to the Moto X too or not? You're right though, you're going to save some battery life by integrating the baseband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so are ac specs similar to the Moto X too or not? You're right though, you're going to save some battery life by integrating the baseband.

 

I cannot speak to real world performance, but the 802.11ac spec is MCS index 9 (single stream, 256-QAM, 80 MHz bandwidth, 400 ns guard interval).

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot speak to real world performance, but the 802.11ac spec is MCS index 9 (single stream, 256-QAM, 80 MHz bandwidth, 400 ns guard interval).

 

AJ

Ok, I see what you're saying. Time to go through the Moto X's FCC page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleatus, just putting info out there. I wouldn't take offense from someone else's work. If you didn't like that, you really won't like phone arena's article comparing it to the S4. On an unrelated note, a sprint store manager spoke to their LG rep and told me that Sprint would be the last to carry the device, and said "maybe 2 months unfortunately". Maybe they'll have a sale when you buy the G2 and the gpad?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleatus, just putting info out there. I wouldn't take offense from someone else's work. If you didn't like that, you really won't like phone arena's article comparing it to the S4. On an unrelated note, a sprint store manager spoke to their LG rep and told me that Sprint would be the last to carry the device, and said "maybe 2 months unfortunately". Maybe they'll have a sale when you buy the G2 and the gpad?

Thumbs down...I'm ready to move on from my s3 Lol. It's not a bad device, but I've had it since launch and its the device I've had the longest out of any other on sprint.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extensive testing of the first sprint triband device, from LG no less? That would be music to my ears , a stark comparison to the incessant whining we would endure if the device was launched with hiccups

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

That 800 MHz band better be a fine tuned machine before the average user gets their hands on a tri-band device. And since Sprint just canned a gaggle of phone support staff its even more imperative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just came across this image online, and I had to share! :D

 

:rofl:

Someone edited that on g+ when LG announced the phone. Everyone was talking about the Verizon spam so someone took it upon themselves to fix it lol.

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not strictly a G2, but seeing as the last Nexus was a derivative of the Optimus G, there's a good chance this leaked Nexus is a derivative of the G2 (especially considering the LG logo on the back). Holding out a sliver of hope there's a Sprint version...

 

nexus-5-1020-rumor_large_verge_medium_la

 

http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/3/4691652/did-google-just-leak-the-nexus-5-kitkat-video

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The device on the left does not look "LG."  It looks "Asus" -- almost the spitting image of the back of my second gen Nexus 7.  Unless that man is huge enough to make a Nexus 7 look small, the device appears to be potentially a 5 in handset version of the second gen tablet.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Verge (certainly not the definitive authority on the matter) unequivocally says:

 

The mystery device also includes an LG logo at the rear, meaning the two companies may be collaborating on another Nexus handset.

 

 

And here's a little bit of motion:

 

1SuQhNG.gif

 

Check out the reflection on the left where the LG logo is on the Nexus 4. Those don't look similar/identical to you?

 

Either way, as a Nexus it probably won't come to Sprint, but I'm still holding out hope.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% that is an LG logo. And I agree it does not look like a G2 derivative. I vote for this using the 5.5 inch display from the G Pro, and there being another Nexus 4 in the works as well.

 

Don't forget there is an LG D820 FCC filing for which we don't yet know the device...

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

 

Edited by djw39
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were on Tmobile I would wait to see what the New Nexus (5) is going to be. It looks like a G2 dervivative without the back buttons. It might have lower specs, but pure android  with updates guaranteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hopefully the Sprint version comes sooner than Sept 25th.  To be honest, Sprint should be selling it next Friday 9/13 since ATT and Verizon are selling the LG G2 on 9/12 and 9/13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...