Jump to content

You guys might flame, but I gotta ask


Recommended Posts

I signed up with Sprint for 2 years with the iPhone 5. I've been an android guy since the OG EVO days and I must admit although many say the iPhone 5 is inferior to the quad core devices, I must agree, but at the same time the 5 is a great product and I have no reason to go back to android. I have been getting LTE near my home area, but the coverage is spotty and I have seen improvements in LTE coverage and it has only been a week! I still have 7 days to return to Sprint for a full refund. Tmobile's new plans for $99 iphone 5 + $90/month seems appealing considering I'll get HSPA+ or LTE. My question is in the long run which would be a better investment? I have limited knowledge when it comes to future deployments of either company. The only thing I do know is speed wise I was much happier on Tmobile. Coverage wise I am better off on Sprint. I know your answers may be a bit bias, but I'd like to understand why Sprint will be better than Tmobile for future LTE deployments.. Please convince me to stay! lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a greater requirement for you? Coverage where you can use your phone? Or faster speeds where you can use your phone?

 

For me, coverage is better than speed, since I have access to WIFI at home, and at work, and when I'm traveling, the speeds are sufficient for my needs.

 

Sprint is better in the sense that they are installing LTE on almost every cell site, so basically if you have 3G coverage, you'll see LTE coverage, almost a 1:1 coverage.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post kind of has me scratching my head.

 

First, if you've done any reading around here you should realize "flaming" others is generally frowned upon.knee-jerk responses are not what S4GRU is about. That's one of the reasons i enjoy around here.

Second, then pitting the EVO vs the iPhone, Android vs iOS, and Sprint vs T-Mobile, seems to be inviting flames.

Third, what does EVO vs the iPhone and Android vs iOS, have to do with Sprint vs T-Mobile?

Fourth, "Please convince me to stay! lol.", lol? Really?

Finally, fifth, do your homework. Read up around here.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See these following threads for a very,very informative discussion about T-mobiles 4g network and Sprints 4g network projects.

 

http://s4gru.com/ind...-sprint-4g-lte/

http://s4gru.com/ind...verybody-elses/

 

Long story short, T-mobiles currently does not plan to expand LTE coverage to areas that do not already have HSPA. Any areas that are Edge / 2g will stay that way for the conceivable future (at least till 2015) and will most likely not be touched until all their HSPA coverage have been worked on.

 

By 2015, Sprints Network will overall but much more attractive than T-mobile in terms of coverage and indoor penetration due to sub 1ghz spectrum (SMR 800) which will make Sprints LTE characteristics nearly equal to that of Verizon and ATT. T-mobile will no doubt sometimes have better LTE speeds in urban areas thanks to the fact that they own a lot of 10x10 in many areas of the country but once you get out of the urban area, you'll most likely drop to 2g which is a huge shocker. Sprint will have at least a minimum of 3g EVDO incase you get out of LTE range.

 

In the end. T-mobile is a very, very attractive option for urban dwellers who hardly ever go out of the city or travel around. Sprint will have a network that will only get better with time in both urban and more rural areas. Sprint/Clearwires TDD-LTE will put a damper on T-mobile speed wise if Sprint decides to deploy them in all of its urban markets while SMR 800 will put T-mobile to shame.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a greater requirement for you? Coverage where you can use your phone? Or faster speeds where you can use your phone?

 

For me, coverage is better than speed, since I have access to WIFI at home, and at work, and when I'm traveling, the speeds are sufficient for my needs.

 

Sprint is better in the sense that they are installing LTE on almost every cell site, so basically if you have 3G coverage, you'll see LTE coverage, almost a 1:1 coverage.

 

When it comes to T-Mobile vs Sprint in Florida, T-Mobile might actually be a better option. Unlike most states T-Mobile almost has universal HSPA+ coverage throughout the state.

 

Thanks for the great responses. I will read up a bit more later on, but thats exactly what I wanted to hear lol.

 

Look at the 4G coverage maps on T-Mobile's site, that is the coverage you will have now and for the future.

 

Next, look at the coverage maps for Sprint and where they have 3G, that is your immediate future for LTE coverage (this year). Next year will be a whole different ballgame with 800mhz LTE. The new 800mhz LTE network will destroy the coverage T-Mobile has in nearly every location. It offers vastly better in-building coverage.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to consider is that two big appeals of the Sprint network, LTE on 800 and 2500, arent supported by any phone now.

 

So if you lock yoruself in.....well, you lock yourself out.

 

You might be best of waiting for an Iphone 5S which hopefully supports the full range of frequencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see 2500 MHz speed capabilities as a draw or a value proposition for telling you to stay with Sprint.

 

First, it won't be possible to use LTE 2500 for at least another year or two, in most areas.

 

Second, the range of 2500 is pretty poor in most urban areas, you pretty much have to be within line of sight to the tower to get a good usable signal.

 

BUT, I can say that the LTE SMR800 is a good value proposition for Sprint. Although none of us have access to it yet, it will be interesting to have when we finally do have devices that support it. Which should hopefully be this year.

 

If you want hardcore widespread LTE coverage TODAY then you should probably just go to AT&T or VZW. Not S or TMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want hardcore widespread LTE coverage TODAY then you should probably just go to AT&T or VZW. Not S or TMO.

 

The problem with this statement is capacity. The LTE networks from big red and blue are already slowing down due to saturation. Big red is adding AWS LTE, but just like Sprint, no devices support it. Blue will eventually add WCS spectrum, but that is years off. They may have the most coverage, but they also have the most users.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every device is inferior to some other device. If you're paying for it and you like it, problem solved.

 

I agree with other posts here; T-Mobile may have some geographical coverage now (NONE near me) but I see them growing the customer base like Sprint did and eventually running into the same capacity problems Sprint is just now crawling out of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Every device is inferior to some other device. If you're paying for it and you like it, problem solved.

 

I agree with other posts here; T-Mobile may have some geographical coverage now (NONE near me) but I see them growing the customer base like Sprint did and eventually running into the same capacity problems Sprint is just now crawling out of.

No that wont happen as the issue with sprint is their antiquated backhaul......tmobile has fiber almost everywhere already

 

That wont be a big issue like it was on sprint....as far as spectrum time till tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with this statement is capacity. The LTE networks from big red and blue are already slowing down due to saturation. Big red is adding AWS LTE, but just like Sprint, no devices support it. Blue will eventually add WCS spectrum, but that is years off. They may have the most coverage, but they also have the most users.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Forum Runner

I wonder if AT&T might wait until the Leap deal goes through and then would add both WCS and AWS, but that's just speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No that wont happen as the issue with sprint is their antiquated backhaul......tmobile has fiber almost everywhere already

 

That wont be a big issue like it was on sprint....as far as spectrum time till tell

Been browsing some old threads lately, have we? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No that wont happen as the issue with sprint is their antiquated backhaul......tmobile has fiber almost everywhere already

 

That wont be a big issue like it was on sprint....as far as spectrum time till tell

T-Mobile most certainly does not have fiber "almost everywhere" there are quite a few GPRS/EDGE sites running on T1s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In rural areas, Sprint EV-DO and T-Mobile EDGE (or even GPRS) are not similar in speed.  Sprint EV-DO typically runs 1+ Mbps.

 

But that is largely irrelevant on the Sprint end anyway, since Sprint is upgrading both urban and rural areas to LTE.  Meanwhile, T-Mobile is upgrading only urban areas that already have W-CDMA, hence already have advanced backhaul.  The rural areas and small markets that lack W-CDMA will continue to rot for the next few years.

 

dontsh00tmesanta, do not revive old threads just to troll for T-Mobile.  Consider yourself warned.  The next step is suspension or ban.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they do..... In every hspa zone they have fiber

 

Which ATM beats sprint and allowed them to catch up

This is far from accurate. T-Mobile has thousands of HSPA/HSPA+ sites with just T1 backhaul. Every Tmo WCDMA site in New Mexico outside of the big cities (ABQ, Santa Fe, Las Cruces) has T1 backhaul and run between 100k and 2Mbps. Most run around 500kbps.

 

I can go out in my front yard right now with a Tmo 4G signal and it will run around 130kbps with a decent ping around 90ms.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And at the moment edge is still faster than sprint 3g in most places

This isn't true either. Sprint 3G tends to run great in rural areas where Tmo runs EDGE/GPRS. In my area, Sprint 3G runs 1-2.5Mbps and Tmo EDGE runs around 100kbps. And this is also true the places I travel in Colorado, Texas and Oklahoma. Just because you want to make a point that Sprint legacy 3G suvcka, doesn't make it accurate.

 

Your posts offer nothing substantative to the discussion, are inaccurate and have a trolling quality. Please stick to facts if you are going to be negative about Sprint. And when you're going to be negative, it needs a to be constructive. If you're just going to troll our site, go somewhere else. Or we will help you get there.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given I have a tmo phone and a sprint phone you I can confirm that

 

But I'll digress edge and sprint 3g is similar in speed

I have a Sprint phone, Tmo phone, Verizon phone and an ATT phone. What's your point? Your facts are still lacking.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Sprint 3G speeds have been awesome. Even before NV upgrades were completed, I still don't know anyone in their right mind who would consider T-Mobile Edge faster than anything besides my wife browsing through a Yankee Candle store.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Did my drive from PHX to SEA & got to experience the terribleness that is the totem lake area. Impressive, speed test didn't complete either time.
    • Weird that they'd go back to the Edge+. Would think they'd let folks use the S22 just like with Genesis. In other news, St. Louis has 10x10 n71 + n66 SDL live. A bit more info here:  
    • Wonder what other spectrum the auto industry can use, how much of the 5.9GHz was being used, and if 30MHz will be enough 20 or 30 years from now. The auto industry has had it for 20 years sure, but technology can move really slow.  It isn't good.  It isn't ready for real world applications. The hardware is too slow to be able to process enough reliable data. It is too expensive.  Etc. I would argue that we are just getting to the point where features that I would assume could use 5.9GHz are just now hitting mass market as the code is better, hardware is not only significantly faster but also cheaper. The baseline trim models still lack a lot of safety features but the next trim up usually comes with a bunch of goodies I'd assume could make use of 5.9GHz. Just imagine where we were in 2005, 2010, 2015.  Mostly just assumptions without enough knowledge of the spectrum use, so a hint of skepticism. With the what, 1.2GHz that opened up in the 6GHz range, getting 45MHz out of 5.9GHz is very meh.
    • Cool find! Been there since 2018 according to Cellmapper. The only other time I've seen them leave up a temp site like this for a long period of time was when a nearby site is temporarily inoperable like the one in Red Hook Houses. That doesn't seem to be the case here and it's pretty much a GMO site at this point. My best guess is that T-Mobile wanted to put a site there to fill in coverage but because it's on LGA's grounds getting the actual permission to do so is extremely complex so they worked out a deal with the Port Authority to put up a COW in the meantime.  
    • Would this be a T-Mobile COW outside LGA Terminal A? eNB 49106 seems to line up to its position, plus the arm for the trailer to hook onto a truck says T-Mobile. Here is the NYC streetcar view the image was pulled from.     For all the years I have been monitoring the DAS, I have never gotten -55 or better, even after passing by every antenna in a station that is deep enough to have 0 outside macros reaching in. The SNR is still 20+, so its probably designed that way on purpose.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...