Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

It's only PCS from Grain Management. T-Mobile will be able to deploy 10x10 PCS LTE in Cincinnatti.

 

Overall they're still spectrum constrained there.

Yep. Att and verizon each have 20x20 leaving 5x5 for tmus.

Hopefully they shutdown gsm soon to free another 5x5 in pcs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Legere went from sexy, classy Carly to this bimbo

Looks like T-Mobile's picked up Richard Sherman too. Maybe it's because they're both so good at preventing receptions. ;)

 

If you want some good chuckles, just read the comments at TmoNews.  Many, many Magentans find the association with Richard Sherman and Kim Kardashian off putting.  Even among the faithful, the over the top T-Mobile shtick is starting to wear thin.

 

http://www.tmonews.com/2015/01/t-mobile-kim-kardashian-west-team-up-for-selfie-centric-data-stash-ad/

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want some good chuckles, just read the comments at TmoNews. Many, many Magentans find the association with Richard Sherman and Kim Kardashian off putting. Even among the faithful, the over the top T-Mobile shtick is starting to wear thin.

 

http://www.tmonews.com/2015/01/t-mobile-kim-kardashian-west-team-up-for-selfie-centric-data-stash-ad/

 

AJ

I can somewhat understand Richard Sherman because he plays for the Seahawks and Seattle is T-Mobile's home city. No such excuse exists for Kim.

 

Though if I had to make a pick I would have seen if Russell Wilson would be the key NFL endorser of T-Mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though if I had to make a pick I would have seen if Russell Wilson would be the key NFL endorser of T-Mobile.

 

He would not fit the artificially crafted T-Mobile image.  Russell Wilson is too "vanilla" -- pun intended or not.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The auction is already delayed and with the broadcasters acting like they are it is more likely that it gets delayed even longer.

Then eminent domain their asses.

Each 6mh channel can host 3 video streams. Force them to consolidate and that's that.

The legal basis for doing this is well established.

 

If fcc is okay pissing off everyone in telecom by passing net neutrality why not piss off the broadcasters?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then eminent domain their asses.

Each 6mh channel can host 3 video streams. Force them to consolidate and that's that.

The legal basis for doing this is well established.

 

If fcc is okay pissing off everyone in telecom by passing net neutrality why not piss off the broadcasters?

 

You do realize how politically connected the broadcasters are, right? This 600 MHz auction is screeching toward a debacle. No amount of flag waving by Sprint, SoftBank, T-Mobile US, or John Legere can change the dynamics of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize how politically connected the broadcasters are, right? This 600 MHz auction is screeching toward a debacle. No amount of flag waving by Sprint, SoftBank, T-Mobile US, or John Legere can change the dynamics of that.

As was stated fcc is independent. Not even a federal law passed and signed by obama protect against eminent domain.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another note, is anyone noticing that Verizon is staring to open a little gap with T-Mobile on the NetIndex rankings? Mickey and Joey were talking about how Verizon is kicking ass on the network side on the Cell Phone Junkie webcast. I think they're on to something here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then eminent domain their asses.

Each 6mh channel can host 3 video streams. Force them to consolidate and that's that.

The legal basis for doing this is well established.

 

If fcc is okay pissing off everyone in telecom by passing net neutrality why not piss off the broadcasters?

 

I don't care how much of a legal basis exists for eminent domain of wireless spectrum. All forms of eminent domain is just another form of control over Us the People. I don't like it one bit. And yes, I have reasons to be concerned, because eminent domain will be the only way a freeway will end up less than half a mile from my house, and: NO THANK YOU!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter how much longer the incentive auction takes, it's still a faster path to new spectrum than something like eminent domain would be.  First of all, the incentive auction is required by law, whereas eminent domain would have a not insignificant number of lawmakers screaming at the FCC (more so than are right now about net neutrality).  Second, the legal challenges to the FCC over the incentive auction are a drop in the bucket next to what would happen if you attempted to use something like eminent domain.  It would be tied up in legal challenges from every TV broadcaster for many many years.  Third, I'm not an attorney, and I doubt you are either, so I don't even know if something like that would be legal.  If this were communist China where the government just does whatever it wants with no recourse, I'm sure it would be, but we don't live in communist China.

 

Net neutrality, controversial as it is, at least has some precedent in the form of existing regulations on other services like landline telephones.  What you're proposing does not.

 

Finally, the FCC is an "independent agency" but was still created by Congress and has its members appointed by the President.  If Congress doesn't like something the FCC does, ultimately it can undo those actions.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another note, is anyone noticing that Verizon is staring to open a little gap with T-Mobile on the NetIndex rankings? Mickey and Joey were talking about how Verizon is kicking ass on the network side on the Cell Phone Junkie webcast. I think they're on to something here...

 

I've noticed something similar. 

 

Verizon has been pushing density + small cells like crazy over here, even our smallish suburbs have gotten some. They literally have dual overlapping coverage on both bands in a mall here (one tower of which they constructed themselves, this year) plus a DAS in the mall, plus a small cell just for a one particular Costco and street between those towers. 

 

They're building lots of capacity they don't even need yet. Which is awesome to see, but I'm sad it's only Verizon doing that here so far.

 

My guess is that Verizon is determined to retain that #1 network ranking. And since T-Mobile is pushing data speeds (and winning on them, in a handful of markets), Verizon's upping their speeds through better density (better AWS reception).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed something similar. 

 

Verizon has been pushing density + small cells like crazy over here, even our smallish suburbs have gotten some. They literally have dual overlapping coverage on both bands in a mall here (one tower of which they constructed themselves, this year) plus a DAS in the mall, plus a small cell just for a one particular Costco and street between those towers. 

 

They're building lots of capacity they don't even need yet. Which is awesome to see, but I'm sad it's only Verizon doing that here so far.

 

My guess is that Verizon is determined to retain that #1 network ranking. And since T-Mobile is pushing data speeds (and winning on them, in a handful of markets), Verizon's upping their speeds through better density (better AWS reception).

 

Verizon also has the ability to take their time with this kind of stuff. Their LTE rollout is pretty much "done". Right now they are able to divert most/all of their attention to things like DAS and small cells while all of the other carriers have working on multiple things at once.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I give Verizon credit. They are ignoring all the market flub and antics, and focusing on network deployment and optimization. 

 

I can appreciate that, and while the average speedtest junkie may disagree, their service is consistent, and that's what the end consumer wants.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I give Verizon credit. They are ignoring all the market flub and antics, and focusing on network deployment and optimization. 

 

I can appreciate that, and while the average speedtest junkie may disagree, their service is consistent, and that's what the end consumer wants.

I have long admired Verizon. They do care about their network. They are also the provider most likely to stay up after a power failure. They are expensive, but if you want reliability and consistency, they are the provider to get. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes sense for Verizon, as they still have x amount budgeted for capex every year, and if LTE coverage is everywhere they have to do something with the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can somewhat understand Richard Sherman because he plays for the Seahawks and Seattle is T-Mobile's home city. No such excuse exists for Kim.

 

Though if I had to make a pick I would have seen if Russell Wilson would be the key NFL endorser of T-Mobile.

 

What we be more fitting for T-Mobile is Marshawn Lynch and Kim...punks and bimbos.

 

Cco8y.AuSt.38.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we be more fitting for T-Mobile is Marshawn Lynch and Kim...punks and bimbos.

 

"I'm just here so I won't get fined."

 

"And I'm just here because of my behind."

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been watching the new antenna structure applications on the FCC website and Verizon has always had by far the most new applications for new towers then anyone.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...