Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

Remember for how for half of a year all he said was "We're gonna pass Sprint by the end of the year." and that tune turned into "We're gonna pass Sprint for sure in 2015." Not to mention, marketing Unlimited like crazy to lure Sprint Unlimited customers.

 

I think what Sprint did that was smart was embrace unlimited and shared data. Although T-Mobile has tiered data, it would prove annoying/confusing for those coming from the big two in that it isn't actually shared data. At one point T-Mobile advertised 10GB of data for 4 people for $100 or something along those lines but what screwed them over was that each person was limited to 2.5GB a month. Sprint's Double Data promotion is what made Verizon and AT&T customers switch since it was simple, you'll get double the data for the same price.

Legere tweeting something does not equal marketing.

Since when do only sprint customers like unlimited?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legere tweeting something does not equal marketing.

Since when do only sprint customers like unlimited?

 

1. He did not only tweet it, he said it many times throughout the year.

2. Legere has has 907k followers, that's marketing!

3. No one said only Sprint customers like Unlimited, however the Unlimited value proposition is obviously attracting more customers from Sprint than the duopoly. Unlimited data is no longer seen as a must have feature since Verizon and AT&T started doing tiered data and share plans years ago. Their customers have grown accustomed to the tiered data layout and aren't in a haste to switch to Unlimited anymore. Whenever my friends complain about using data and I tell them I have Unlimited data, they just shrug it off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. He did not only tweet it, he said it many times throughout the year.

2. Legere has has 907k followers, that's marketing!

3. No one said only Sprint customers like Unlimited, however the Unlimited value proposition is obviously attracting more customers from Sprint than the duopoly. Unlimited data is no longer seen as a must have feature since Verizon and AT&T started doing tiered data and share plans years ago. Their customers have grown accustomed to the tiered data layout and aren't in a haste to switch to Unlimited anymore. Whenever my friends complain about using data and I tell them I have Unlimited data, they just shrug it off.

http://www.veracast.com/webcasts/citigroup/imt2015/67205536707.cfm

 

T-Mobile's CMO Mike Sievert take on Sprint earlier today:

 

We are not a price leader in the industry, we have a great value btw, but we don't play on the price. We don't have to. What we offer is already a great value, the customers love it. We've done eight big industry changing moves that have very little to do with changing our prices, because our prices are great, people love the value we are offering. And they are paying us more than they've ever paid us before in our history.

 

When it comes to Unlimited, we offer it opportunistically. We are really proud of the deal, it's unbelievably simple, customers love it. Our customers do use more data than any of our competitors' customers, so they're highly interested in the internet. But it's not our point of differentiation. UnCarrier is our point of differentiation. In stark contrast to let's say Sprint, who really is got nothing but price. I mean nothing but price! And their first big move in the Fall when they started to show some signs, is to slash prices!!! That was their first move. What's the second move when your first move is to slash prices?! That's a tough spot. 

And so their business model is absolutely wholesale addicted to unlimited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. Sprint seems way less addicted to unlimited than T-Mobile if you ask me.

 

T-Mobile has ~20-30% of subs on unlimited plans. Sprint has the overwhelming majority on unlimited plans. I'm not sure how that is less addicted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint continues to grab some more #1 or #2 spots on root metrics in 1st Half 2015, I think that will give Sprint the momentum they need to keep eating away subscribers from VZW and ATT.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint continues to grab some more #1 or #2 spots on root metrics in 1st Half 2015, I think that will give Sprint the momentum they need to keep eating away subscribers from VZW and ATT.

I agree. Perception is everything. I had a friend switch from Verizon to sprint and he said he had no service change but he was kinda nervous to switch because of what he has heard about sprint. If sprint can start to win more on root metrics sprint should play that up in commercials

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the webcast from yesterday, Marcelo said they (Root Metrics) don't want their name used. Not sure if this changes their future marketing or not.

I'm pretty sure that wasn't RootMetrics, because he mentioned them a few times on Chicago example. 

That independent research he was talking about is a mystery.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile has ~20-30% of subs on unlimited plans. Sprint has the overwhelming majority on unlimited plans. I'm not sure how that is less addicted?

 

That's because many Sprint customers are on legacy Unlimited plans from before 2010. Additionally T-Mobile got rid of Unlimited and had to bring it back. Sprint has been pushing share plans much more heavily than Unlimited whereas nearly everything that T-Mobile has been marketing has been Unlimited or has something to do with unlimited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the webcast from yesterday, Marcelo said they (Root Metrics) don't want their name used. Not sure if this changes their future marketing or not.

 

 

I'm pretty sure that wasn't RootMetrics, because he mentioned them a few times on Chicago example. 

That independent research he was talking about is a mystery.

 

Yeah I don't think he was referring to RootMetrics either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because many Sprint customers are on legacy Unlimited plans from before 2010. Additionally T-Mobile got rid of Unlimited and had to bring it back. Sprint has been pushing share plans much more heavily than Unlimited whereas nearly everything that T-Mobile has been marketing has been Unlimited or has something to do with unlimited.

It's Sprint's wholesale business that's heavily based on Unlimited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But then again, it is BGR, and it looks like T-Mobile is serious about expanding that LTE network footprint already.

One thing is for sure, once your customers leave because of the network issues, it is really tough to get them back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the chart within that article both sprint and tmobile are one of the same besides tmobiles data speeds. What I want to know more so on tmobiles end based on the chart is how many subscribers currently want out because of the network but aren't able to because they are locked into their phone payment plan and don't want to shell out a few hundred to leave?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the chart within that article both sprint and tmobile are one of the same besides tmobiles data speeds. What I want to know more so on tmobiles end based on the chart is how many subscribers currently want out because of the network but aren't able to because they are locked into their phone payment plan and don't want to shell out a few hundred to leave?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am one of those people who wants out but I don't want to shell out $1200 to leave. I am going to wait until December for my wife and I to go back to York, Pa and take both of t mobile lines to Sprint. This will give Sprint more than enough time to finish the network in the places we go. T mobile will never cover South Eastern, York county and we go there multiple times a year. Sprint will earn our business!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But then again, it is BGR, and it looks like T-Mobile is serious about expanding that LTE network footprint already.

One thing is for sure, once your customers leave because of the network issues, it is really tough to get them back.

 

Or convince them to switch when folks around them have issues with the company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am one of those people who wants out but I don't want to shell out $1200 to leave. I am going to wait until December for my wife and I to go back to York, Pa and take both of t mobile lines to Sprint. This will give Sprint more than enough time to finish the network in the places we go. T mobile will never cover South Eastern, York county and we go there multiple times a year. Sprint will earn our business!

Yea that's more than enough time for sprint and tmobile to get it together. The installment plans are good but they trap people in more than the 2 year contract. But people love not having to shell out $200+ for the latest phone.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by derrph
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea that's more than enough time for sprint and tmobile to get it together. The installment plans are good but they trap people in more than the 2 year contract.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I couldnt agree more. The carrier is less on the hook, whereas I am completely screwed. I could sell my wifes iphone 6 and my 6 plus but I doubt I would be able to break even. But like I said, 12 months is more than enough time for Sprint to finish up around us and get the network complete. I want to be able to travel on 95 without hitting any 3g from NC to Pennsylvania. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldnt agree more. The carrier is less on the hook, whereas I am completely screwed. I could sell my wifes iphone 6 and my 6 plus but I doubt I would be able to break even. But like I said, 12 months is more than enough time for Sprint to finish up around us and get the network complete. I want to be able to travel on 95 without hitting any 3g from NC to Pennsylvania. 

PA is good for all carriers on the east side, just be thankful you dont have to travel the west side between Erie and Pittsburgh or down 15 (PA/NY) border to Harrisburg, all the carriers are so/so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...