Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

looks just like what each carrier has already but this one looks like it supports all carriers so you dont have to have carrier specific one....

Can you name a single US operator that already has this type of LTE-A SmallCell solution commercially deployed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you name a single US operator that already has this type of LTE-A SmallCell solution commercially deployed.

I have no idea, alls I said was it LOOKS like its what all the carriers sell already but THIS one looks like it COIULD support all the carriers....  :tu: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small cells can be fully powered off of a single PoE cable? That's incredible! (Is this a new thing? Or am I getting excited about something that's been around for awhile?)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small cells can be fully powered off of a single PoE cable? That's incredible! (Is this a new thing? Or am I getting excited about something that's been around for awhile?)

The concept of Ethernet as a single feed has been around for a while, but in the U.S. market, there hasn't been any significant commercial deployments of SmallCell. LTE-U or LAA is a brand new concept. Hopefully this year we'll see more of these launches from different vendors.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that puts pressure on Sprint to have 3 carrier aggregation complete by the end of the year. That likely won't happen until the WiMax shutdown on November 6th though. 2 Carrier Aggregation is likely right around the corner though.

I think 3 channel CA is coming early 2016 for sprint. I wonder if sprint plans to aggregate the multiple carriers within the PCS band with band 26 or down the line aggregate 600mhz and 800mhz....or aggregate PCS and BRS

 

 

The possibilities lol!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 3 channel CA is coming early 2016 for sprint. I wonder if sprint plans to aggregate the multiple carriers within the PCS band with band 26 or down the line aggregate 600mhz and 800mhz....or aggregate PCS and BRS

 

 

The possibilities lol!!

 

Perhaps further on, but I doubt they'd ever do such a thing in the near term. Sprint has so much BRS/EBS spectrum that they are set for a long time. I'm sure as EVDO usage drops and as Sprint moves on to VoLTE (whenever they do) we'll see Sprint pursue PCS carrier aggregation or maybe even increasing carrier size to provide higher peak speeds on PCS, but as I said before, that's not for a long time. 

 

PCS and BRS probably won't ever be aggregated simply because of technical difficulties TDD->FDD and all that jazz. 

 

600MHz and SMR sounds smart but I'm not sure Sprint'll want to do so immediately. Knowing the users on this site, people will be watching FCC documents for any indication of such happenings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job on their part! I wonder how Sprint did though.

 

Sounds like it wasn't that great for Sprint.

 

 The company said it logged porting ratios of 1.4 versus Verizon , 1.8 versus AT&T and 2.2 versus Sprintin the fourth quarter.

 

 

I can't believe how many subscribers T-Mobile has gained - they've done a great job.  I am glad to see the increased competition - good for us Sprint users as well as we've seen Sprint up their game significantly as of late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like it wasn't that great for Sprint.

 

 The company said it logged porting ratios of 1.4 versus Verizon , 1.8 versus AT&T and 2.2 versus Sprintin the fourth quarter.

 

 

I can't believe how many subscribers T-Mobile has gained - they've done a great job.  I am glad to see the increased competition - good for us Sprint users as well as we've seen Sprint up their game significantly as of late.

 

Just because their Sprint porting ratio was high doesn't mean they didn't do well. T-Mobile seemed to be targeting sprint for nearly the whole year whereas Sprint has been targeting Verizon and AT&T mostly since Marcelo Claure became CEO. Then if we look at Verizon's foreshadowing that Q4 wasn't as good as usual for them and AT&T's silence, it can be suspected that Sprint put a bit of a dent in Verizon and AT&T's results. To me, T-Mobile's preliminary Q4 results aren't really different from what they usually do each quarter. It doesn't stand out from their usual trend as being particularly better.

 

But as I said, good on them for having such a great year of customer additions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because their Sprint porting ratio was high doesn't mean they didn't do well. T-Mobile seemed to be targeting sprint for nearly the whole year whereas Sprint has been targeting Verizon and AT&T mostly since Marcelo Claure became CEO. Then if we look at Verizon's foreshadowing that Q4 wasn't as good as usual for them and AT&T's silence, it can be suspected that Sprint put a bit of a dent in Verizon and AT&T's results. To me, T-Mobile's preliminary Q4 results aren't really different from what they usually do each quarter. It doesn't stand out from their usual trend as being particularly better.

 

But as I said, good on them for having such a great year of customer additions.

How has tmobile been targeting sprint specifically? Seems they're just doing more of the same tactics while sprint I agree has been targeting att vz.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because their Sprint porting ratio was high doesn't mean they didn't do well. T-Mobile seemed to be targeting sprint for nearly the whole year whereas Sprint has been targeting Verizon and AT&T mostly since Marcelo Claure became CEO. Then if we look at Verizon's foreshadowing that Q4 wasn't as good as usual for them and AT&T's silence, it can be suspected that Sprint put a bit of a dent in Verizon and AT&T's results. To me, T-Mobile's preliminary Q4 results aren't really different from what they usually do each quarter. It doesn't stand out from their usual trend as being particularly better.

 

But as I said, good on them for having such a great year of customer additions.

 

Yes, ideally, I would like to see Sprint stay #3 and watch AT&T/VZN bleed!!!

 

That would definitely make some dreams come true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has tmobile been targeting sprint specifically?

 

Uh, do you understand the words that are coming out of John Legere's mouth?

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

better then nothing

 

You mean "better than nothing."  But, remarkably, one month data rollover is better for a month, then nothing.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint actually mentions att vz in commercials. What does tmobile say or do that targets sprint vs all 3?

 

I believe you answered my question.  You do not understand -- or, at least, listen to -- the words coming out of John Legere's mouth.

 

Now, I have actual paid work to do.  I will let others chime in to tell you how you are wrong.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint actually mentions att vz in commercials. What does tmobile say or do that targets sprint vs all 3?

For awhile they gave people that switched from Sprint unlimited data for a year.  It was some type of referral promotion.

 

EDIT: Legere really hammers Sprint on Twitter.  Anytime Sprint posts an achievement, Legere runs in and stomps on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint actually mentions att vz in commercials. What does tmobile say or do that targets sprint vs all 3?

 

Remember for how for half of a year all he said was "We're gonna pass Sprint by the end of the year." and that tune turned into "We're gonna pass Sprint for sure in 2015." Not to mention, marketing Unlimited like crazy to lure Sprint Unlimited customers.

 

I think what Sprint did that was smart was embrace unlimited and shared data. Although T-Mobile has tiered data, it would prove annoying/confusing for those coming from the big two in that it isn't actually shared data. At one point T-Mobile advertised 10GB of data for 4 people for $100 or something along those lines but what screwed them over was that each person was limited to 2.5GB a month. Sprint's Double Data promotion is what made Verizon and AT&T customers switch since it was simple, you'll get double the data for the same price.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For awhile they gave people that switched from Sprint unlimited data for a year. It was some type of referral promotion.

 

EDIT: Legere really hammers Sprint on Twitter. Anytime Sprint posts an achievement, Legere runs in and stomps on it.

The referral was from any carrier not just sprint.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...