Jump to content

SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths


mikejeep

Recommended Posts

Ah! That is very interesting, I wonder if Sprint is going to eventually transition everything onto 310120. It's not all bad news.. yes, it's more work for me, but identifying the PLMN has proven to be very unreliable. That's why SignalCheck isn't great at B41 identification yet. Is there a confirmed GCI pattern? I thought I follow all the relevant threads, I will go do some digging. The app would actually work much better if it only had to rely on GCI patterns (see Band 26 and AT&T band identification).

 

There's always time for football!! :)

 

-Mike

 

In Chicagoland, the pattern is for B25/B26 GCIs to be 07Exxxnn, while B41 8T8R is 07Fxxxnn (i.e., the market identifier is incremented by 1).  Columbus reports the same (I don't remember their market IDs).  Of course, the dratted site ID is different for the B41 stuff (for example, 07E19300 for a B25 north-facing sector vs. 07F5E300 for B41 facing north on the same site). No one has yet reported if the site ID offset (F5E3-E193 = hex 1450) is a constant or varies wildly like the B25/B26 site IDs themselves vary.  This will likely have to come from someplace like Columbus where they have identified and charted the sites, as in Chicagoland we are too preoccupied watching what passes for baseball & football to do the spreadsheets (or maybe we are just too lazy :) ). (And the market has over 1,000 sites, which is rather intimidating.) Further, as the immediately preceding post suggests, there may be more numbers flying around as Sprint turns on the full 8T8R capability.

 

It's so simple . . .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: If I have a B25 site that I have added a note to in SCP, and then I see that same note when I am connected to B26, is that definitely coming from the same site?

Yes. Only the sector id in brackets will change, but if the site id stays the same, you'll get the same note.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Chicagoland, the pattern is for B25/B26 GCIs to be 07Exxxnn, while B41 8T8R is 07Fxxxnn (i.e., the market identifier is incremented by 1).  Columbus reports the same (I don't remember their market IDs). 

 

Columbus Market GCI Market IDs are 086 for B25/B26, 087 for Sprint B41 (00F for Clear B41).

 

 

...Of course, the dratted site ID is different for the B41 stuff (for example, 07E19300 for a B25 north-facing sector vs. 07F5E300 for B41 facing north on the same site). No one has yet reported if the site ID offset (F5E3-E193 = hex 1450) is a constant or varies wildly like the B25/B26 site IDs themselves vary.  This will likely have to come from someplace like Columbus where they have identified and charted the sites,

 

You need to know your GCI pattern, including high capacity LTE sites (more than one GCI assigned).   Chicago should just take the leap and do a spreadsheet.  Look at Cincinnati as an example, they just started a few months ago.  Plenty of guys like me also go through Chicago on occasion and can provide more data (I have some stored but unreleased).  Given the different less predicable signal characteristics of B41, where you can sometimes get -85db at the edge because of wider channels and MIMO, it would be very useful to have a spreadsheet to speed the site identification process.

 

For Columbus COZisBack figured out as +1450hex (including market GCI) or pattern shift, but that is just based on three sites identified by triangulation with sectors.  We need more Sprint b41 to go live to be 100% positive.  8T8R installation continues at a fast pace, so hopefully soon.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Only the sector id in brackets will change, but if the site id stays the same, you'll get the same note.

 

Then that is amazing, I'm getting a b26 signal for probably close to 10 miles, spanning a number of b25 sites, I'll have to plot it on a map to measure the distances.

 

Before I added a site note I thought multiple b26 sites in the area were live, but now it looks like it is just one that covers a huge area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Chicagoland, the pattern is for B25/B26 GCIs to be 07Exxxnn, while B41 8T8R is 07Fxxxnn (i.e., the market identifier is incremented by 1).  Columbus reports the same (I don't remember their market IDs).

 

Columbus Market GCI Market IDs are 086 for B25/B26, 087 for Sprint B41 (00F for Clear B41)...For Columbus COZisBack figured out as +1450hex (including market GCI) or pattern shift, but that is just based on three sites identified by triangulation with sectors.

 

We need more Sprint b41 to go live to be 100% positive.  8T8R installation continues at a fast pace, so hopefully soon.

 

It does look like the market ID +1 pattern might be consistent, but it is still early. If that's the case, it will pose a challenge to me because I would have to figure out all the possible B41 IDs and check against that list.. and hope Sprint didn't change anything down the road. I was really hoping that they would just follow the B26 pattern of changing the sector IDs.. that would make things very very easy on my end!

 

If the middle (site ID) portion of the GCI turns out to have an offset that is consistent everywhere, I can work with that. If it varies by market/vendor, that's going to be tricky.

 

No matter what, I agree that we need to see more evidence before calling anything a definite.

 

-Mike

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, you're the programmer, and I'm just a user with zero programming experience, but wouldn't it be possible/easier to just show the connected band by gci? What I mean is, instead of worrying about the plmn sticking on certain phones, and not showing band 41 all the time. What about just a rule of "whenever the gci ends in xx, it will equal band 26, 07F/00A/00B/087 = band 41 (Chicago), etc.." Just a thought.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, you're the programmer, and I'm just a user with zero programming experience, but wouldn't it be possible/easier to just show the connected band by gci? What I mean is, instead of worrying about the plmn sticking on certain phones, and not showing band 41 all the time. What about just a rule of "whenever the gci ends in xx, it will equal band 26, 07F/00A/00B/087 = band 41 (Chicago), etc.." Just a thought.

He does that with band 26 but who has a list of the area codes available someone will have to go around and map each area. Do the area codes overlap with different venders?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, you're the programmer, and I'm just a user with zero programming experience, but wouldn't it be possible/easier to just show the connected band by gci? What I mean is, instead of worrying about the plmn sticking on certain phones, and not showing band 41 all the time...

Haha well I'm not a programmer either, that's the problem!! ;)

 

You are absolutely right though, and I've been leaning toward that solution because it would work much better. And the new 8T8R sites are apparently using 310120 so I need to do something like this anyway. The sticking PLMN is becoming more of an issue as B41 rolls out to more areas (everywhere but here it seems like).

 

The problem is that doing this is not as easy as it is for B26.. at least not yet. For B26, the sector bits will always match a very short list. The B41 sectors vary quite a bit, and follow the same pattern as B25 in some areas, so that's out. Matching the beginning of the GCI (the market portion) will work, but I would have to collect all of the possibilities -- there are dozens, if not hundreds. But once I had that list, it would work better than the current setup.

 

I'm looking into either building something within the app to submit logs to me to be parsed automatically, or creating a basic Google Doc for people to submit B41 GCI's.

 

Ultimately I'd like to fix the PLMN problem anyway, because even if the band is displaying properly, the ID could still be wrong. And someday there will be LTE roaming to consider too.

 

-Mike

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going through my old gci log I noticed the third number is even on my single band device xx0,xx2,xx4,xx6,xx8,xxA,xxC,xxE. Does anyone else notice that?

 

Mike do you want me to send you a link to my old log? It has gci from connecticut to Miami on the east coast.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going through my old gci log I noticed the third number is even on my single band device xx0,xx2,xx4,xx6,xx8,xxA,xxC,xxE. Does anyone else notice that?

 

Mike do you want me to send you a link to my old log? It has gci from connecticut to Miami on the east coast.

 

Wow.. I think I know who my favorite person of the week is! I just went through my log as well, and out of over 1,000 entries I have saved (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, ATL, BWI, MKE, and ORD), every single B25/B26 site does have an even third character. And the handful of B41 sites (all Clearwire / pre-8T8R AFAIK) all have an odd character.

 

I trust what you're saying, I don't need your log at the moment -- but can others check and confirm this? Particularly in other markets and where NV 2.0 deployments are live. I don't need specifics other than if this pattern holds true and where you are.

 

-Mike

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.. I think I know who my favorite person of the week is! I just went through my log as well, and out of over 1,000 entries I have saved (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, ATL, BWI, MKE, and ORD), every single B25/B26 site does have an even third character. And the handful of B41 sites (all Clearwire / pre-8T8R AFAIK) all have an odd character.

 

I trust what you're saying, I don't need your log at the moment -- but can others check and confirm this? Particularly in other markets and where NV 2.0 deployments are live. I don't need specifics other than if this pattern holds true and where you are.

 

-Mike

 

At least in the Chicago Market, Clear sites may be 00A or 00B (but always leading with 00). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 41 04Cxxxxx would shoot down the third number theory. Do you know if the plmc was 310120?

I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think there are any 8t8r setups in Tampa yet. So I'm chalking those up to being clear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know where to post this but you guys would know what's up. I'm in Upstate SC with a LG Volt flashed to Sprint and SignalCheck Pro says LTE B41 and i don't think we even have band 41 around here and the engineering screen says band 25 with no activity and band 26 when the data connection is doing something.

SCP is not 100% it is a great tool but you should check the engineering screens to make sure. He has been having issues with identifying band 41 do you have screenshots. Hopefully he can figure it out before to many band 41 sites come online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figured out how to post screenshots.

Yeah that is band 25. I think the problem is he grabbed the plmn number values before it changed back to 310120. 311490 is clear band 41 I think you may have connected then disconnected from the clear site. Is it a one time thing or do you notice it all the time? A second way it could happen if the tower was broadcasting something wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll test it somewhere else today. Maybe it's just this tower

You will need to restart your device than the method he uses to get that information must be broken. As soon as I see a issue with the displayed information it usually fixes any small bugs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...