Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - San Diego Market


ferhusky

Recommended Posts

I'm surprised that Sprint would use AT&T for its internet services to the tower. I would've thought Sprint in this instance would use Time Warner Cable/Cox for those services, unless Sprint got a better deal from AT&T. Then again I'm surprised AT&T would let Sprint buy their service since AT&T has their own wireless division. I guess the only reason why AT&T would sell their internet services, is due to some sort of government regulation where they have to sell their products to competitors.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

We have seen 50Mbps/50Mbps fiber from AT&T for $1500 3 year contract.  I am pretty sure others are not as competitive.  Cox in San Diego utilizes AT&T fiber also.  I don't know who can beat that price?

 

Time Warner is north of the 8 and south bay.  AT&T is citywide with all the fiber  :td:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fastest speed I managed to receive.

 

I think it is the iPhone  :lol:

 

My EVO LTE getting at least 20Mbps at most LTE sites in San Diego.  :tu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cox 10Mbps/10Mbps fiber is $1100.  http://ww2.cox.com/business/sandiego/data/pricing.cox

 

Now do you go with 50 or 10? If you go with AT&T for 50Mbps you have to wait it out average 6 months (their ordering process takes forever).  Most of the time AT&T has to delivery fiber for Cox from our experience installing Cox fiber to our clients.  Those orders from Cox took 3-6 months average depending on location.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$1500 was price for 50Mbps/50Mbps we recently installed for a client.  I would assume Sprint would start out with at least 50Mbps/50Mbps for their cell sites.  I don't know the exact details but I will ask when AT&T installs their equipment for one site that we know of that is in progress.  Maybe they will tell me 500Mbps.  :tu:  Who knows.  Maybe Robert knows.

 

AT&T has their wholesale services which would fall in the category for Sprint.  http://www.business.att.com/wholesale/Service/data-networking-wholesale/metro-services-wholesale/sonet-wholesale/

 

I know they can deliver 1Gbps or 10Gbps if needed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is the iPhone :lol:

 

My EVO LTE getting at least 20Mbps at most LTE sites in San Diego. :tu:

I tested it again and I got 17. Fastest I've ever gotten in San Marcos was around 24 Mbps.

T-mobile is still faster. :(

post-18758-0-30347600-1370484750_thumb.jpg

Edited by Eric24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been said they start with 100 mbit even on their investors conference calls.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

Sounds like 100Mbps should cost at least $2000+/month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tested it again and I got 17. Fastest I've ever gotten in San Marcos was around 24 Mbps.

 

Do you have a phone case?  I have seen 3-5db difference without a case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tested it again and I got 17. Fastest I've ever gotten in San Marcos was around 24 Mbps.

T-mobile is still faster. :(

 

I have seen 32Mbps+ on Sprint too. The upload was only at 10Mbps though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen 32Mbps+ on Sprint too. The upload was only at 10Mbps though.

 

It's the FDD- setup. Your upload can only be half of the download theoretically. T-mobile, ATT, VZ, & the rest are limited to this as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Back to NV reporting. Slackers! Get me some pictures of Alcatel-Lucent base stations and of the no 800 rru setup so i can add better pictures to my thread!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Back to NV reporting. Slackers! Get me some pictures of Alcatel-Lucent base stations and of the no 800 rru setup so i can add better pictures to my thread!

 

I will have very nice ones very soon.  I have full access to site in San Diego that is in progress.  Currently awaiting AT&T fiber.  We provide IT services for the clients throughout the building at that site   :tu:

 

I will make sure I get some snap shots of everything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will have very nice ones very soon.  I have full access to site in San Diego that is in progress.  Currently awaiting AT&T fiber.  We provide IT services for the clients throughout the building at that site   :tu:

 

I will make sure I get some snap shots of everything!

 

Make redundancies of redundancies. I expect albums of 100s of photos of the same thing (Lol). But seriously. I scoured this entire thread, San bernando , orange county, and metro la and cannot find much images so it's much appreciated if yall step up with the images of Alu equipment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LA is hella covered with LTE, as shown by sensorly. San Diego is not even close to the coverage LA has so I think its safe to assume San Diego won't be an "Official" 4G city for another 6-12 months :/

 

I'm thinking that San Diego will get a sudden jump in acceptances once AT&T finally brings fiber to the 3G-upgraded towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that San Diego will get a sudden jump in acceptances once AT&T finally brings fiber to the 3G-upgraded towers.

 

Yup.  Many sites are just waiting on deliveries of AT&T fiber.  Too bad Cox can't provide the fiber city wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ran a couple of tests here at work, and this is what I'm getting.

Screenshot_2013-06-07-09-23-58.png

Screenshot_2013-06-07-09-19-43.png

Screenshot_2013-06-07-09-19-37.png

Screenshot_2013-06-07-09-14-18.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...